Text 2787, 322 rader
Skriven 2006-06-07 23:33:48 av Whitehouse Press (1:3634/12.0)
Ärende: Press Release (0606072) for Wed, 2006 Jun 7
===================================================
===========================================================================
Press Gaggle by Tony Snow
===========================================================================

For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
June 7, 2006

Press Gaggle by Tony Snow
Aboard Air Force One
En route Washington, D.C.



12:15 P.M. EDT

MR. SNOW: Hello, all, let's gaggle. All right, first on the President's
day, let's see -- aboard Air Force One, since we've lifted off, there have
been two head-of-state calls, one to President Antonio Sacca of El
Salvador, and also Peru's President-elect, Alan Garcia. The Salvadoran
call, primarily about immigration. On Peru, they talked first about
congratulations on winning the election, the President passed them on;
talked about defending and extending democracy in the region; and also
working together on issues of free trade.

Coming up today on the President's schedule: When we land he'll be meeting
with bicameral Republican congressional leadership. That's a sort of
standard, regular meeting on a broad range of issues. There will be a
swearing in for Dirk Kempthorne as Secretary of the Interior. And then, as
you know, about five different codels went to Iraq during the break. There
will be a meeting with members of both Houses and both parties about Iraq.

And I believe that's everything on today's public schedule. Questions.

Q Tony, how does the President analyze the results of the 50th
congressional district in California?

MR. SNOW: Well, he's happy that Brian Bilbray won. Look, it was a close and
tight race all along. But it's also interesting to note that in a case like
this, everybody was trying to look for a bellwether. I think a lot of
critics were hoping that this would be a kind of bellwether so that they
could say that the Republican Party and the presidency were in peril. And
they clearly -- their hopes were clearly frustrated.

Q So not a bellwether, then?

MR. SNOW: No, it was a tight race. It was a race that in many ways was
governed by a series of local issues and it was a tough race for
Republicans. Here you had Duke Cunningham having to leave Congress; and you
had Brian Bilbray, whose activities as a lobbyist had been brought up as a
campaign issue; and having missed votes while traveling had been an issue.
That's a tough election.

And, furthermore, one of the things we've noticed in looking at polling in
recent weeks is that people who stick with the President on immigration, on
the issue, that tends to be attractive over the long run when people hear
about comprehensive reform. Representative Bilbray didn't support that --
nevertheless, we congratulate him on his victory. It was a tough race.

Q Is it true that the United States has agreed to allow Iran to have
uranium conversion?

MR. SNOW: No. I would walk you back a little bit. Maybe the most important
point to make about what has gone on is, number one, this is not a
U.S.-Iran negotiation, period. It's still a multilateral world community
with Iran. Number two, the precondition of suspending uranium
enrichment-related and reprocessing activities -- that is still an absolute
condition, and it is agreed upon by the United States, by the P5 plus one,
by the IAEA. Everybody has agreed on that condition.

Again, Iran has to do that to get to the table to be able to discuss
incentives and disincentives. I know that a lot of characterizations have
been made in the press by people who may have indirect or, in some cases,
incomplete knowledge of what was offered. But we're not going to go into
the details; we've said that before and I'll say it again. But I will
reiterate the fundamental point, which is that the precondition of putting
an end to all -- suspending all enrichment-related and reprocessing
activities, that is still the precondition and it's agreed upon by all
parties who have gone to talk with the government in Tehran.

Q So the answer is "no"?

MR. SNOW: The question was -- again, nothing happens -- I am not going to
negotiate from here. We are not going to talk about specifics in the
negotiation. And, furthermore, I'm just not going to get into any -- it was
a general question that got a specific answer. I'm not going to talk about
specific proffers.

Q Is it on the table that down the road, that if they come back to the
table that they would be allowed to --

MR. SNOW: Again, I'm not going into specific proffers; we're just not going
to do that.

Q Well, you said that our reporting is wrong.

MR. SNOW: Here's what you're supposed to take: There is no change in the
administration position. There has been the insinuation that somehow there
was a step back from the notion that Iran had to suspend. There is no
change in that position on the part of the negotiating countries. So that's
what I meant by that answer.

Q But you're not commenting on the reporting that the U.S. would contribute
to uranium enrichment or --

MR. SNOW: Again, what I'm telling you is a lot of stuff has been put in
play by people who may not have full knowledge of what was actually in the
document. I will steer you back to my fundamental point, which is, Iran
must suspend uranium enrichment-related and reprocessing activities -- you
probably can say this by memory now. They have to do that to get to the
table, period. That has not changed.

Q Did the President have any reaction to the reports yesterday about all
those servicemen who had their records apparently compromised in that
theft?

MR. SNOW: Well, I didn't talk about it -- I didn't talk to him about it,
but I think -- you may recall that what happened is we got this report, and
Chairman -- I mean, Secretary Nicholson -- I know, it's different jobs, at
least I didn't say "Ambassador" -- Secretary Nicholson said they had to go
back and they had to match between a database at the Veterans
Administration and the hard drive, and said that there may be further
clarifications of what's going on.

At this point, we continue to encourage people who may have concerns to
contact the website or the phone number -and, unfortunately, I don't have
them on me right now, but the VA has been leaning forward, so anybody who
has concerns about the possible compromise of any information ought to
contact the VA numbers, and they can walk them through. So far there has
been no evidence of any identity theft, but we obviously remain concerned
about the story.

Q What about the report out of the European watchdog group that 20-some-odd
countries participated or allowed the rendition flights? And can you give
us any reaction to that?

Q We can't hear the question.

MR. SNOW: He's asking about the rendition story. Several points to make on
rendition. Number one, rendition is something that has been practiced by
nations for a very long time. Carlos the Jackal, you may recall, by
rendition ended up in a French jail. Nations have to work together on
intelligence matters. It's also very important to stress that the United
States does not condone torture, does not practice torture. Torture is
illegal and we acknowledge and follow all international laws.

Furthermore, we will not agree to send anybody to a nation or place that
practices torture. So when it comes to the rendition things, those are the
important pieces to remember. It's also important to remember again that
international cooperation in the war on terror is essential for winning,
and rendition is not something that began with this administration, and
it's certainly going to be practiced, I'm sure, in the future.

Q There are reports saying that there was human rights violations --

MR. SNOW: I am not going to respond to a report.

Q Is the President aware of a soldier, I believe, in California, who is
going to become today the first person to refuse publicly his assignment to
Iraq? And does the President have a position on whether he should be
excused?

MR. SNOW: No, I don't. For that I'd refer you back to the Pentagon for
comment on it.

Q The Senate just rejected the constitutional amendment to ban gay
marriage. Leaders in the House say they still plan to take it up. Does the
President think that's a good use of their time, when it's clear they don't
have the votes in Congress to get it passed?

MR. SNOW: Well, I'd leave that to members of the House to decide. Again,
Nedra, as you know, it's possible for members of Congress to take up a
whole lot of issues at once -- in fact, it's their job. And this is an
issue on which, I dare say, many members want to express themselves. I'm
not going to tell them what to put on their legislative calendar.

Q Does the President have any reaction to the failure?

MR. SNOW: Well, he understands that this is an issue that people are going
to want to think about. And he believes strongly that marriage is between a
man and a woman. There is one more vote in the Senate than there was last
time around. It is an issue he will continue to support.

Q Is he disappointed?

MR. SNOW: You know, I don't want to characterize state of mind on it. There
will be a statement out later, and we'll see if there's any expression of
his emotional condition.

Q He lobbied for this, or spoke out in support of it yesterday and over the
weekend. So a cause that he championed has lost -- so does he --

MR. SNOW: It's fair enough, Jessica. The President understands that on an
issue like this, it tends to evolve in response to things that are going on
around the country. He has spoken repeatedly on the fact that nationwide,
in a number of states, voters in a number of states and legislatures have
defined marriage as being between a man and a woman, only to have courts
overturn it. And he said that he wishes it hadn't come to this, that
judicial activism is a concern. This is an issue that will play out over
time, and the defeat does not mean that he's despondent or that he gives up
on it. He knows that this is a long fight.

Q Tony, now that the Iranians have been presented the incentives package,
are you at liberty to describe the package, the contents?

MR. SNOW: No.

Q Getting back to immigration. Are there things in the immigration bill
that would prevent the President from signing it? Has he laid out what sort
of the "black area" would be?

MR. SNOW: The President doesn't negotiate against himself. What he really
wants to do is work with members of both Houses of Congress. As he pointed
out today, a year ago, everybody was saying, put it off, don't do it, it's
too hot. Now you've had the House and Senate both adopt legislation with
regard to immigration. And the President is making it very clear, I think,
that he wants a comprehensive bill, or new set of bills, if necessary --
comprehensive immigration reform. And that is going to continue to be his
position.

I think it's also important to note that as the President gets out and
talks about this, people begin to understand his position better. They get
to see it. We had -- today, he had the opportunity to speak with people who
had come here and become citizens, who had started businesses. He had an
opportunity to sit in on a classroom, and some of you were in there. And
this helps dramatize what's going on. Today he was dramatizing not only
importance, but how it happens that you do assimilation.

He's going to sign an executive order when he returns that is going to
mobilize federal departments and agencies to figure out ways to make it
easier for people who want to become American citizens, and who are
pursuing a legal path -- that is whatever path has been so defined; I'm not
going to try to get into prejudging the legislation -- make it easier for
people to assimilate by learning the language, learning the culture,
learning history, learning civics, and being able to integrate into
American society and take full advantage of what the President described,
the old phrase, the American Dream.

So that's what he's doing. He's not going to get into the process of
saying, this is what I demand. The President is not making demands right
now. What he's trying to do is to lead, to lay out principles. And one of
the points he's been making the last two days is that there is not a lot of
disagreement on the principles he's been talking about. So he's hoping that
members of both Houses are going to be able to work together to go ahead
and accomplish the chore of having a comprehensive immigration package.

Q There seems to be substantial disagreement on the idea of the pathway to
citizenship and legalization that the President outlined. Do you see any
hopes for some kind of compromise there?

MR. SNOW: That's not what -- again, you're asking me to try to engage in
negotiations. I'm not going to do it. The President has made it pretty
clear what he wants.

And again, I think what happens, too, is as people begin to see his
position, I think it has some effect --that politicians and citizens will
be taking note. They'll be getting a fuller understanding of where he
stands and what he wants. And that always has an impact, when the President
takes that kind of a stand.

Q At the top, you said that when he gets back he's meeting with members of
the House and Senate?

MR. SNOW: There are two meetings. There's a bicameral meeting with
Republican leaders, and then there's a bipartisan meeting with people who
have just come back from Iraq. There were five different codels that were
over in Iraq.

Q The topic is going to be Iraq, then, or --

MR. SNOW: No, no, no. The first meeting -- he meets fairly regularly with
the bipartisan leadership, and they'll talk about a whole bunch of stuff.
I'm sure immigration and taxes and all that stuff will come up. The second
one is specifically about Iraq.

Q Do you know the times on those?

MR. SNOW: Yes. I think -- let's see, the Republican meeting is at 1:55
p.m., and the Iraq meeting is at 3:25 p.m.

Q Yesterday when the President was asked about Somalia, he said that when
he gets back, he's going to strategize with Secretary Rice. Is there any
plan for a meeting on Somalia, in particular?

MR. SNOW: I don't think there's a specific meeting. When the President
meets with Secretary Rice -- or, for the matter, with Secretary Rumsfeld --
they tend to talk about a lot of stuff. And, obviously, with Secretary
Rice, you're not going to have a meeting just on Somalia -- you've got
Iran, you've got Iraq, you've got a lot of things. But it certainly will
come up. And I don't know if they're going to be talking by phone.
Secretary Rice comes over a lot. I don't have any specific guidance, but
I'm sure it's going to come up quite soon.

Q -- on Maliki, and the President's confidence in their government, how
it's evolving, and the violence in Iraq?

MR. SNOW: Well, once again, we are looking forward to the Prime Minister
being able to get in place his interior and defense ministries. That's
obviously an important step.

Q He's not troubled by the delay?

MR. SNOW: He understands that when you're doing government formation,
especially in a brand new parliamentary system, it's a complicated chore.

Q Is the President planning to meet with Secretary Rice --

MR. SNOW: I don't -- like I said, I don't know. There's nothing on the
calendar that I have. But they meet frequently and they talk frequently.
There's nothing on today's calendar.

Q All right, thank you.

MR. SNOW: All right, thanks.

END 12:30 P.M. EDT

===========================================================================
Return to this article at:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/06/20060607-2.html

 * Origin: (1:3634/12)