Text 3386, 431 rader
Skriven 2006-10-10 23:31:10 av Whitehouse Press (1:3634/12.0)
Ärende: Press Release (0610109) for Tue, 2006 Oct 10
====================================================

===========================================================================
Remarks by the President at Mac Collins for Congress Reception
===========================================================================

For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
October 10, 2006

Remarks by the President at Mac Collins for Congress Reception
Macon Centreplex
Macon, Georgia



5:35 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT: Thanks for coming. It's good to be in Macon. Thanks for
coming out. One thing about old Mac is you know where he stands.
(Applause.) That's the kind of congressman you need from this part of the
world, and that's the kind of congressman we need in Washington, D.C.
(Applause.) Straightforward thinker, bringing common sense to the Nation's
Capital.

I'm proud to stand here with Mac Collins. I know him well. I've worked with
him, I've listened carefully to his ideas. No doubt in my mind he's the
best person to represent the 8th Congressional District from the state of
Georgia. (Applause.)

I'm also for him because he married well. (Applause.) Of course, that's why
he invited me, because I married well. (Laughter.) And I want you to know,
Julie and Mac, that Laura sends her very best to you both. I know she was
your first choice for this fundraiser. (Laughter.) She's got to be the most
patient woman in America. I know we've got some Texans here, and they --
they went to the same college as Laura did. And when she went there, she,
frankly, wasn't interested in politics and, I think, didn't care for
politicians. (Laughter.) Now, here she is as the nation's First Lady, and I
firmly believe this country is better off with Laura as the First Lady.
(Applause.)

I'm not only proud to be here with Mac Collins -- and I want to thank you
for supporting him, by the way. I cannot thank you enough for helping this
good man. He not only needs to fill the hat in order to run a good
campaign, he's going to need your work coming down the stretch. He's going
to need you to help make the phone calls and put up the signs and turn out
the vote. He's going to need the grassroots activists to step up and say to
their fellow citizens, you've got a good man in Mac Collins. He knows what
happens in Washington, D.C. He's not a novice up there, when he gets back
up there. He knows what he needs to do. And he's going to represent the
will of the people of this district, see. That's the thing I like about
Mac. And so I want to thank you for giving of your money, and thank you for
giving of your time when we come down the stretch.

I also want to thank you for supporting one of the nation's fine governors,
Governor Sonny Perdue. (Applause.) You know what -- all Sonny is doing is
-- in office is what he said he's going to do. He said he's going to do
this, he's going to do it, and he does. And I'm proud to be with Sonny and
I want to thank you for helping him.

I'm also proud to be able to work with a really fine United States Senator
in Senator Saxby Chambliss. (Applause.) And I see sweet Julianne is with
you. Thanks for coming, Julianne. Now, let me say this about Saxby -- if
you're interested in agriculture, you don't have to worry about your
interests being represented in the United States Senate. The man has got
some stroke up there in Washington -- (laughter) -- and he knows what he's
talking about. And those of us in the White House listen to him. Senator,
we're proud you're here. (Applause.)

Georgia has got a fine congressional delegation, and one of the congressmen
is with us today -- Lynn Westmoreland. Congressman, thanks for coming. Good
to see you. Appreciate your time. (Applause.) We've spent some quality time
together, and I know he's a good one, and I know he's looking forward to
getting Mac up there to work with him to do what's right for the country.

I want to thank Alec Poitevint with us. He's the Chairman of the National
Committeeman. It seems like I've been saying his name for two decades, or
three decades. (Laughter.) Thanks for coming, Alec. Perry McGuire --
(applause) -- Perry McGuire is with us. He's the candidate for the Attorney
General for the state of Georgia. Perry, thanks for coming. (Applause.)
Good luck to you, Perry.

I want to thank all the local officials and state officials who are here.
Appreciate you serving. There are a lot of issues that I'll be talking
about. I know Mac will be talking about them. We've got issues such as
making sure we become less dependent on foreign oil. (Applause.) It's going
to be helpful to have these Georgia farmers growing oil -- growing the
feedstock for oil -- (laughter) -- like soy diesel or ethanol. It's coming.
I look forward to working with Mac to spend some money to help new
technologies evolve. We can't be complacent just because the price of
gasoline is going down. Being dependent on oil from overseas is still a
national security concern. And I intend to push hard for technologies that
will enable us to diversify.

I'm going to work with Mac to make sure health care costs are reasonable so
people can have affordable insurance. There's a lot of issues we can talk
about, but one of the most important issues is taxes. It's a big national
issue. I want to spend a little time talking about it today because there's
a fundamental difference between the Republican and Democrat Parties on
this important issue. And I'm going to discuss this issue and these
differences between now and Election Day. And I'm going to spend some time
right here in Macon, Georgia, talking about it. (Applause.)

Mac and I share a philosophy about taxes. We believe that the people who
best know how to spend your money are the people who earn the money in the
first place. (Applause.) And that's you. So we worked to ensure that
working families are able to keep more of their paycheck. And that -- those
weren't just empty campaign words. Those are actually deliverables. That's
what we did. Max stood squarely for cutting the taxes. My administration
and the Congress have enacted the largest tax relief since Ronald Reagan
was in the White House. We cut the taxes for every American who pays taxes.
(Applause.)

If you paid income taxes, we cut your taxes, see. We doubled the child tax
credit; we reduced the marriage penalty; we cut taxes on small businesses;
we cut taxes on capital gains and dividends to promote investment and jobs.
And to reward family businesses and farmers for a lifetime of hard work and
savings, we put the death tax on the road to extinction. (Applause.)

The Republican record on taxes is clear, and the Democrats in Washington
have a clear record of their own. The trouble is, they don't want you to
know about it. Recently, the top Democrat leader in the House made an
interesting declaration. She said, "We love tax cuts." Given her record,
she must be a secret admirer. (Laughter and applause.) It's not just the
so-called tax cuts for the rich she opposes. When we cut taxes for
everybody who pays income taxes, she voted against it. When we reduced the
marriage penalty, she voted against it. When we cut taxes on small
businesses, she voted against it. When we lowered the taxes for families
with children, she voted against it. When we put the death tax on the road
to extinction, she voted against it. Time and time again, she had an
opportunity to show her love for tax cuts -- (laughter) -- and she voted,
no. (Laughter.) If this is a Democrat's idea of love -- (laughter) -- I
wouldn't want to see what hate looks like. (Laughter and applause.)

Now she and other Democrats are trotting out their old line about how
they're only going to raise taxes on the rich. You've heard that before.
Sounds like a nice idea until you start doing the math. Let me just give
you one example. Earlier this year, the Democrats put forward a budget
alternative that called for $177 billion in additional spending authority
over the next five years -- a number that does not include all the other
spending they proposed. The problem is, even if they raise taxes on
everyone making over $200,000, they would bring only $108 billion of new
revenues. And that means the Democrats would have to come up with $69
billion for additional spending they proposed. And guess who's going to
have to pay?

When the Democrats find themselves short of money to pay for all their
spending promises, it's the middle class Americans who get stuck with the
bill. Recently the top Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee --
that's the committee that writes taxes -- said he can't think of one of our
tax cuts that should be extended. Think of that, not one. Not the tax cuts
for families with children, not the reduction in the marriage penalty, not
the tax cuts on small businesses, not the tax cuts on dividend and capital
gains, not the cut in the death tax. Even when asked to explain his
remarks, he refused to commit to extending a single tax cut we passed. If
he's not going to commit to extending these tax cuts now, think of what he
would do if the Democrats gained control over the United States Congress
and he became chairman of this important committee.

The difference between our parties could not be clearer, and so is your
choice on Election Day. If you want to keep the tax cuts we passed, vote
Republican on November the 7th. (Applause.)

What they don't seem to understand, what the national Democrats don't seem
to understand is that the economy grows when you control more of your own
money. The tax cuts we passed put more than a trillion dollars in the hands
of American workers and families and small businesses. And you've used that
money to help fuel our strong and growing economy. The national
unemployment rate is now 4.6 percent. People are working in the United
States of America. (Applause.) Since August of 2003, our economy has added
more than 6.6 million new jobs. Our pro-growth economic policies work.
They're making a difference for the people of America. (Applause.)

And this strong and growing economy has helped us reduce the federal
deficit. When I set a goal of cutting the deficit in half by 2009,
Democrats said we couldn't get it done. Last year the ranking Democrat on
the House Budget Committee said that my budget brought us nowhere near the
goal of cutting the deficit in half. Here's what actually happened -- a
growing economy has helped produce record tax revenues, and in July I
announced that we were a year ahead of schedule in our plans to cut the
deficit in half. (Applause.)

The Democrats' approach to cutting the deficit is taking more of your money
to pay for their spending. The Republican approach is to restrain spending
and let you keep more of your own money so this economy grows. And there's
a fundamental difference and it's clear as night and day.

Next month has got this choice to make: Do we keep taxes low so we can keep
this economy growing, or do we let the Democrats in Washington raise taxes
and hurt the economic vitality of this country? The decision is yours to
make in the voting booth. This decision will have a huge impact on the
working people all across the United States of America. Whether you're a
worker worried about the size of your paycheck, or a business owner who's
thinking about hiring more workers, or a family worried about gas prices or
health care costs, the last thing you need is higher taxes. (Applause.) To
keep this economy growing and delivering prosperity to more Americans, we
need to make the tax relief we passed permanent. (Applause.) And the best
man for the 8th Congressional District from Georgia to do that is Mac
Collins. (Applause.)

Now, there are a lot of issues we got to discuss on the campaign trail, lot
of domestic issues. But there is no bigger issue facing the voters than who
best to protect the United States of America. (Applause.) You know, when I
was campaigning in Georgia in 2000, I didn't believe I'd be saying such a
statement. I didn't want to be a war President. I don't remember a lot of
discussion about war in the 2000 campaign. But war came to our shores, a
war we didn't ask for and a war we must win, for the sake of future
generations. (Applause.)

People ask me, what's it like to be the President. I said, it's a
decision-making experience. (Laughter.) And I make a lot. And a lot of
decisions I make are based upon the knowledge I learned from that attack on
September the 11th, 2001. I learned we face an enemy that is ruthless, that
will kill the innocent in order to achieve objectives. I learned we face an
enemy that has got an ideology, an ideology that is hard for a lot of
Americans to understand, an ideology that does not believe in the same
freedoms we believe.

Let's talk about religion for a second. One of the great, great beliefs of
America, and the fundamental cornerstone of our liberty is the fact that in
America you can worship any way you so choose. If you're a Jew, Christian,
Muslim, Hindu, atheist, agnostic, you're equally American -- equally
American. That's a sacred right for all of our citizens. It's a right that
we must never abandon in America. And it stands in stark contrast to what
the enemies of freedom believe. They say if you don't worship the way they
tell you to worship you'll be held to account. They say that if you don't
view religion the way they view religion you'll be punished.

We're in the ideological struggle of the 21st century. It's a struggle
between rational and reasonable people who believe in basic freedoms,
versus extremists and radicals who murder the innocent in order to achieve
their objectives. Right after 9/11, I made it clear that if one were to
harvest -- harbor one of these extremists or radicals they will be judged
as equally as guilty as those who commit murder.

And that's why we went into Afghanistan. I said, you've been harboring al
Qaeda -- remember, they were providing safe haven for al Qaeda to train. I
gave them time to turn over al Qaeda to us; they chose otherwise. And as a
result of defending ourselves, which is the most important job of
government, we liberated 25 million people from the clutches of that
ideology. (Applause.)

This nation cannot wait for threats to fully materialize. If we're to do
our most important job, which is to protect the American people, we must
make sure we deal with threats before they hurt us. That's one of the
fundamental changes of September the 11th. (Applause.) And it's important
to have people in Congress who understand that. It's important to have a
person like Mac Collins who knows that we must deal with the threat
overseas so we do not have to face that threat here at home. (Applause.) I
saw a threat, the Congress saw a threat, the United Nations saw a threat in
Saddam Hussein, and the world is better off without him in power.
(Applause.)

And now the challenge is to do the hard work of helping the Iraqis defend
their freedom, the hard work of helping this young democracy survive the
onslaught of murder from those who would prevent democracy from taking
root. It's in our interests that we do so, because, you see, we must defeat
the enemy overseas so we don't have to face them here at home. And if we
were to retreat before the job is done, they would follow us straight to
America. (Applause.)

And I understand it's hard on the American people, because the enemy is
able to take innocent lives and it gets on our TV screens. And it's hard. I
know it's hard, because Americans are compassionate people. We care about
innocent life. We care about the human condition. But it's necessary work.
We'll continue to make sure our commanders have that which they need to do
the job. We will be flexible in our tactics in order to help this young
democracy survive. We will deploy the assets necessary to bring people to
justice overseas so we don't have to face them here at home.

And I need people by my side in the United States Congress like Mac
Collins, who will make sure our brave men and women who wear the uniform
have all that's necessary to defend the United States of America.
(Applause.) We will stay, we will fight, and we will win for the security
of the United States. (Applause.)

But we must do more than just stay on the offense against these killers. We
pressure them every day. It's harder to plot and plan when you're on the
run or you're hiding in a cave. But I recognized after 9/11 we must also
deploy all assets to protect you. I think about my job of protecting you
every day. It's the most fundamental of all requirements of government. And
so, after 9/11, I called upon Congress, and sometimes -- a week later
called upon Congress to give our folks on the front line of fighting terror
the tools necessary to protect you.

There were walls set up between intelligence and criminal investigators
that made it impossible for folks to share intelligence with those who are
hired to protect you. It's hard for me to explain why that was the case --
just take my word for it. (Laughter.) It was there. You had somebody get
some intelligence, they couldn't share it with the person charged with
criminal justice matters. And it made us vulnerable to attack.

And so I asked Congress to pass the Patriot Act. Congressman Mac Collins
didn't hesitate. He said it's the right thing to do to give those on the
front line of fighting terror the tools necessary to protect you. As a
matter of fact, right after 9/11, it wasn't hard to get the bill passed.
Five years later, however -- or four years later, I came back and said we
need to renew the bill, and on the floor of the United States Senate,
Democrats filibustered the bill. See, that's Democrat-talk --
Washington-talk for killing it, trying to kill it. They must think
differently about this war on terror. It's a fundamental issue in this
campaign, the difference about how to defend America.

The Senate Minority Leader openly bragged about -- "We killed the bill," he
said, killed the Patriot Act. To me, it speaks volumes in this campaign
about which party clearly sees the enemy as it is and which party is
willing to do the hard work necessary to protect the American people. I do
not question the patriotism of anybody. I just know there's a different
mind-set when they fought the Patriot Act's renewal.

As you know, I put in place a plan that said if al Qaeda is calling into
the United States, we want to know why. We want to know why. (Applause.) In
this war on terror, we're capturing people. And sometimes, for example, we
might find something in somebody's pocket, and, say, it had a phone number
of -- an American phone number, and that phone number gets called from
overseas -- not with a call within the United States, but from outside in.
We need to know. If the most important job is to protect the American
people, we need to know why that person, that al Qaeda and/or al Qaeda
affiliate, is making a phone call.

So the United States Congress had a vote on this recently, out of the House
of Representatives; 166 Democrats voted against the bill, voted against
giving our people the tools necessary to protect you. These are fine
people; I know a lot of them. They're decent citizens of our country. They
just have a different view about the world in which we live. Perhaps one
way to summarize it is, okay, we'll get tough, we'll respond after we're
attacked. My attitude is, we better give our folks the tools necessary to
protect you before we get attacked to protect the American people.
(Applause.)

As you, I'm sure, read, we have been capturing people on the battlefield. I
call it a battlefield because this is a war. And we have interrogated those
people in order to find out whether or not they know about attacks on the
United States. In my discussion to the American people about this issue, I
talked about some of the examples. For example, we have captured and
interrogated a fellow named Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who our intelligence
people believe was the mastermind of the September the 11th attacks.

This country is under threat. The enemy still wants to hurt us. And
therefore, it seemed like it made sense to me that when we found the
mastermind, or the presumed mastermind of the September the 11th attacks,
that our professionals should find out what this fellow knows. If the most
important job is to protect the American people, we must give our
professionals the tools necessary to protect you.

This bill came up for a vote recently in the House and the Senate. The
overwhelming majority of Democrats voted against giving our professionals
the tools necessary to protect you. There's a fundamental difference in
this campaign, and it's a clear difference. And the American people need to
understand there's a difference in this campaign. Our most important job is
to protect you from attack, and the Republican Party will make sure our
professionals have the tools that are necessary to defend you. (Applause.)

And the people of this congressional district don't need to worry about
where Mac Collins stands. (Applause.) I look forward to working with this
good man to help protect you from the threats we face.

We're in an ideological struggle. It's the challenge of our time. It's the
call of our generation. We've got a great military, we've got wonderful
professionals working hard to protect you. We've got one other fantastic
way to defend America, a great asset, and that's freedom. I believe in the
universality of freedom. I believe there's an Almighty. I believe one of
the great gifts of the Almighty is the desire for people to be free. And I
believe that the United States of America -- (applause) -- and I believe
the United States of America -- it's in our interest that we promote
liberty. Oh, not every democracy is going to look like ours. Each democracy
ought to represent their own history and traditions. But it's in our
interest that liberty flourish, because that's how you ultimately win the
ideological struggle that pits reasonable people against extremists. That's
how you win a struggle with those who want their children to grow up in a
reasonable society, a hopeful society, against those who will create chaos
so that they can't do so.

You know, I recently -- you might remember, I just had an interesting
experience recently when the Prime Minister of Japan and I went down to
Elvis' place. (Laughter.) Laura and I had never been there, and so --
(laughter) -- I thought that would be fun. (Laughter.) Prime Minister
Koizumi really wanted to go there -- (laughter) -- because he is a -- he's
an Elvis fan. He loves Elvis. But I also wanted to tell a story. I'm going
to tell it right quick and then -- and then head back up -- have dinner
with Laura. Here it is: I find it is a really interesting kind of twist of
history, I guess you could put it, that I'm going to Elvis' place with the
Prime Minister of Japan, and my dad fought the Japanese. Eighteen-year-old
George H.W. Bush -- I'm sure you've got relatives, the same thing happened
to them -- responded to the violent attack on the United States, and said,
I want to -- I want to volunteer, like thousands of other kids.

And we fought the Japanese with all we had. And it was a bloody war --
really bloody war. And yet, 60 years later, I'm on Air Force One flying to
Memphis -- (laughter) -- talking about the peace, working with Prime
Minister Koizumi on issues like North Korea. And I will tell you, we're
more likely to solve this issue peacefully when we've got people like Japan
and China and South Korea and Russia saying the exact same thing as the
United States is to the man in North Korea. (Applause.)

It helps to be able to sit down and talk ally to ally about the peace. We
talked about the fact that the Japanese had 1,000 troops in Iraq helping
this young democracy fight off the extremists that can't stand the thought
of a free society in their midst. We talked about the strategic
implications of abandoning those who long for liberty in the Middle East.
He knows what I know, that there could be a world in which moderate
governments get toppled, which is precisely what the enemy said they want
to do, so that these extremists control energy resources in which they'd be
able to blackmail the free world.

And you combine that with a nuclear weapon in the hands of an Iran, and
Koizumi and I understand that the world would look back and say, what
happened to them? How come they couldn't see the threat? We're all flying
on Air Force One with the former Prime Minister of Japan -- he recently
left office -- talking about the peace. And I found that to be amazing.
Something happened between when George H.W. Bush became a Navy pilot, and
his son is talking about the peace. And what happened was, Japan adopted a
Japanese-style democracy. Liberty has got the capacity to change an enemy
into an ally. Liberty has got the capacity to bring hope where hope is
needed, and light where there's darkness. (Applause.)

I believe -- I believe if this generation does its duty to protect future
generations of Americans, some day an American President will be sitting
down talking with the duly elected leaders of the Middle East and talking
about the peace, and a generation of Americans will be better off.

Those are the stakes of the elections of 2006, the stakes of the world in
which we live. And I'll be proud to work with Mac Collins to bring the
peace we all want. God bless. (Applause.)

END 6:08 P.M. EDT

===========================================================================
Return to this article at:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/10/20061010-9.html

 * Origin: (1:3634/12)