Text 3465, 377 rader
Skriven 2006-10-19 23:31:38 av Whitehouse Press (1:3634/12.0)
Ärende: Press Release (0610199) for Thu, 2006 Oct 19
====================================================

===========================================================================
Remarks by the President at Friends of George Allen Reception
===========================================================================

For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
October 19, 2006

Remarks by the President at Friends of George Allen Reception
Science Museum of Virginia
Richmond, Virginia



5:33 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you all. Thank you for coming, thanks for the warm
welcome, and thank you for supporting George Allen to be reelected United
States Senator of the great state of Virginia. (Applause.)

I'm proud to be here with him. He's a man who has earned the confidence of
the people of this state as a delegate, as the governor -- and a very
successful governor -- as a United States Senator. (Applause.) He's the
kind of fellow who says he's going to -- what he tells you on the campaign
trail he does in office. He doesn't need a poll or a focus group to tell
him what to think or what to say. George Allen is a man of strong
principle, he is a leader, he is the right man to be the United States
senator from the state of Virginia. (Applause.)

And he married well. (Laughter and applause.) And so did I. (Applause.)
See, we got something in common -- we're both named George and we both
married smart, beautiful women. (Applause.) Laura is very fond of the
Allens. She understands that they are honorable, decent people; honest,
good folks. We're proud to call them friends, and I know the people of
Virginia are proud to call George Allen United States Senator. (Applause.)

I appreciate the Lieutenant Governor -- Lieutenant Governor Bill Bolling,
and his wife Jean Ann and the family are with us today. Governor, thanks
for coming. Speaker Bill Howell is with us. Appreciate you being here, Mr.
Speaker.

I had the honor of meeting an interesting fellow at the airport today -- as
a matter of fact, he was at the steps there when I got off of Air Force
One, and we traveled throughout his senatorial district a little bit
because we went and bought some pumpkins. (Laughter.) His name is State
Senator Benny Lambert. (Applause.) See, the Allen campaign understands that
you reach across party line. He did that as the Governor of the state of
the Virginia; he has done that as the United States Senator. There's no
doubt in my mind this good man will win by getting the votes of
Republicans, discerning Democrats, and wise independents. (Applause.)

I really want to thank you all for coming. I appreciate you contributing to
his campaign, and I want to thank the grassroots activists who are here for
what you're fixing to do. See, we're getting close to voting time. We're
coming down the stretch. And for those of you who are going to be putting
up the signs and making the phone calls and going to your houses of worship
or community centers urging people to do their duty as an American citizen
and voting for George Allen, I want to thank you. A lot of times, the
grassroots folks don't get the thanks that you deserve. I'm here giving you
thanks; I know the Senator gives you thanks. Work hard. We need him in the
United States Senate for the good of the United States of America.
(Applause.)

I'm looking forward to continue working with Senator Allen to diversify our
energy. I'm looking forward to promoting ethanol and new technologies so
that we can change our habits and become less dependent on foreign sources
of oil. For the economic security of the United States, and for the
national security of the United States, we need to get off oil. (Applause.)

I'm looking forward to continue to work with Senator Allen to make sure
that patients and doctors make the decisions for health care, not for
people in Washington, D.C. (Applause.) There's a lot of domestic issues
that I look forward to working with Senator Allen on, but there's no bigger
issue than what we do with the people's money -- no bigger issue.

There's a lot of rhetoric in these campaigns, a lot of needless noise in a
campaign. A lot of time it's to obscure the fundamental issues facing the
people of Virginia, and the people all across our nation. And the two
biggest issues in this campaign, in any campaign across the country, is
which party will take the steps necessary to protect the American people
and win the war on terror, and which party is going to keep your taxes low
to keep this economy growing. (Applause.)

George Allen and I have made our position very plain. Nobody has to guess
where we stand. We got a clear record on taxes, and our philosophy is easy
to understand. It says: We trust the people. See, we understand it's your
money, not the government's money. We think the best people to spend the
hard-earned dollars that you make is you. We understand the economy grows
when you have more money in your pocket to save, spend or invest.

And therefore, we worked together to deliver the greatest tax cuts since
Ronald Reagan was the President of the United States. (Applause.) We said,
if you're going to have tax relief, then everybody who pays taxes ought to
get relief. So we reduced the marriage penalty, as well. We doubled the
child tax credit. We understand that an economy grows when the small
business owners are growing. And so we cut taxes on small businesses.

We cut taxes on capital gains and dividends to promote investment and jobs.
And to reward family businesses and farmers right here in the great state
of Virginia for a lifetime of hard work and savings, we put the death tax
on the road to extinction. (Applause.)

Our record on cutting taxes is clear, and the Democrats in Washington, D.C.
have a record of their own. The trouble is, they don't want you to know
about it. (Laughter.) It's interesting that recently the top Democrat
leader in the House of Representatives made an interesting declaration. She
said, "We love tax cuts." Given her record, she must be a secret admirer.
(Laughter.) It's just not the so-called "tax cuts for the rich" she
opposes.

When we cut taxes for everybody who pays income taxes, she voted against
it. When we reduced the marriage penalty, she voted against it. When we cut
taxes on small businesses, she voted against it. When we put the death tax
on the road to extinction, she voted against it. Time and time again, she
and her party voted against tax cuts. Time and time again, when she had an
opportunity to show her love for tax cuts, she voted no. If this is the
Democrats' idea of love -- (laughter) -- I wouldn't want to see what hate
looks like. (Laughter and applause.)

But, by the way, this view of taxes extends beyond the House of
Representatives. Democrats in the United States Senate had the same point
of view. I remember when we cut the taxes in 2003. See, we were coming out
of a recession, and we were dealing with the effects of a terrorist attack,
and we were dealing with the effects of corporate scandal, and we knew that
in order to recover we had to let the people have more of their own money.

And one Democrat in the Senate said these tax cuts would do nothing to
create jobs. One of his colleagues called the tax cuts the wrong
prescription for our economy. Those were the predictions, and here are the
results: the tax cuts we passed have put more than a trillion dollars in
the hands of American workers and families and small businesses, including
millions of families right here in Virginia. And the amazing thing is, the
people did a much better job with your money than the government did, or
could have done. (Applause.)

Since August 2003 our economy has had 37 straight months of job growth.
Since August of 2003, we added 6.6 million new jobs. Small businesses are
flourishing; home ownership is up. This economy is strong, and we intend to
keep it that way. (Applause.)

You know, I'm sure you've heard the line that the Democrats are just going
to raise taxes on the rich. They say it every time. But I want the people
here in Virginia who are listening to the debate on taxes to remember what
happened back in 1992, after the Democrats campaigned on cutting the taxes
for the middle class. Well, they won, and they came to power, and the
middle class tax cut they promised turned out to be one of the largest tax
increases in American history.

We just have a different view of the world when it comes to taxes. We
believe you can spend your money well. The Democrats want the government to
spend your money. No, the best way to make sure that this economy stays
strong is to make the tax cuts we passed permanent. And the best thing the
Virginia citizens can do to make sure taxes stay low is to send George
Allen back to the United States Senate. (Applause.)

It's interesting, if you look at the history of tax cuts, the Democrat
Party always -- didn't always feel the way they feel today. Back in the
'60s, the Democrats understood that our economy grows when Americans keep
more of what they earn, when Americans make their own decisions about how
to save, spend, or invest. You might remember, when President John F.
Kennedy became President, he proposed across the board tax cuts for
American families and small businesses, including tax cuts on capital
gains.

In his message to the Congress in 1963 he explained that cutting taxes
across the board, in his words, would help strengthen every segment of the
American economy, and bring us closer to every basic objective of American
economic policy. John F. Kennedy was right in 1963, and George Allen and I
are right in 2006. (Applause.)

Next month, the people of this state and people all across the United
States have a basic choice to make: Do we keep taxes low so we can keep the
economy growing, or do we let the Democrats in Washington raise taxes,
which will hurt our economic growth? And I'm convinced, when people sift
through all the noise and listen carefully to the debate, the people of
this state and the people across the United States will choose

low taxes and strong economy policy and growth, and that means reelecting
George Allen to the United States Senate. (Applause.)

The biggest issue we face is protecting the American people. It's the most
important job of government. I learned that lesson on September the 11th,
2001, and so did George Allen and a lot of other good folks. And we learned
that fateful day that our most important responsibility is to protect you,
and this is a fundamental issue in this campaign: What candidate or what
party has got the right policies to protect the American people from
further attack.

We face a brutal enemy, an enemy that uses murder to achieve political
objectives. You can't negotiate with these people. There's no such thing as
a peace treaty with these kind of killers. The best way to protect the
American people is to stay on the offense and bring them to justice before
they hurt America again. (Applause.)

And the best way to protect America is to give our professionals the tools
they need to protect you from attack. We recently had a debate -- a series
of debates in the House and the Senate that clarified the two political
parties' position on the war on terror on how best to protect the American
people.

I believe strongly that our CIA professionals should have authorization to
question people we pick up on the battlefield to determine whether or not
they have information that is necessary to protect you. (Applause.) We're
at war with a group of killers. We pick people up off the battlefield, and
I believe that it's necessary to learn what they know so that we can
anticipate attacks before they occur.

This bill came up before the -- in front of the United States Senate, and
one of the strongest advocates for making sure our professionals had the
tools necessary to protect you was Senator George Allen of the state of
Virginia. (Applause.)

The same cannot be said for his Democratic Senate colleagues. More than 70
percent of the United States senators from the Democrat Party voted to take
away this vital tool in the war on terror. We just have a different point
of view, a different look at the world.

You know, another clear example of the difference of opinion came when we
voted for and reauthorized what we call the Patriot Act. There was a wall
that existed between law enforcement and intelligence gathering in the
United States. I know that's hard to conceive, but it's true. In other
words, intelligence officers could not speak with law enforcement officers.
In this new war on terror against these extremists we have to have good
intelligence, and that good intelligence must be shared with professionals
all throughout government in order to be able to protect you.

Right after September the 11th, when people were deeply concerned about
attacks and future attacks, George Allen voted yes on the Patriot Act, as
did 97 of his colleagues in the Senate. And yet, the bill needed to be
reauthorized years later.

And so I called upon the Senate. I said, there's still a threat; we still
face a threat. And yet, Senate Democrats filibustered the bill, the
reauthorization of a bill that would tear down the walls between
intelligence and law enforcement. Filibuster means they don't want it to
pass, so they talk a lot. (Laughter.) It happens quite a bit in Washington.
(Laughter.) The Senate Democratic leader bragged, "We have killed the
Patriot Act." Think about that. The main Democrat in the United States
Senate said, "We killed the Patriot Act." He was asked later by a reporter
whether killing the Patriot Act was really something to celebrate, and he
answered, "Of course it is."

There's a fundamental difference of opinion between Democrats and
Republicans on this issue. They voted for it right after 9/11; they tried
to kill it five years later. Kind of sounds familiar, doesn't it?
(Laughter.) They voted for it right before they voted against it. (Laughter
and applause.) You don't have to worry about George Allen being steadfast
and making sure our folks have the tools necessary to protect you. A
fundamental issue in this campaign is who best to protect the United States
of America. Our record is clear, and you need to send George Allen back to
the United States Senate so we can do our duty, so we can assume the
responsibilities of this era and protect you from further attack.

A big issue in this campaign, of course, is Iraq. Iraq is a central front
in the war on terror. Iraq is a part of defeating an enemy that would like
to hurt us again. Oh, I know -- I've heard all the rhetoric; I'm sure
you've heard it, too, that people say Iraq is just a distraction from the
war on terror. That's what a lot of Democrats believe. Well, if you're out
there listening and you're worried about who to vote for and worried about
which party has the clearest vision about how to protect the American
people, don't take my word for whether Iraq is part of the war on terror,
listen to Osama bin Laden, or Mr. Zawahiri. He's the number two man in al
Qaeda.

These two killers have made it clear that Iraq is an important part of
their campaign to establish a totalitarian form of government across the
Middle East. They have made it clear in their words that they believe
America is weak, that it's just a matter of time, if they murder enough
people, that we will withdraw.

And they want us to withdraw. They want us to withdraw so that they can
establish safe haven from which to launch attacks. They want us to withdraw
so they can topple moderate governments. They want us to withdraw because
they got designs on energy. They would like nothing more than to blackmail
the free world with the fear of running up the price of energy; blackmail
the free world to abandon our alliance with Israel; blackmail the free
world to continue to force the West to cater to their needs and their dark
vision of the world.

When you couple all that with the possibility of Iran having a nuclear
weapon you begin to understand the stakes in the war on terror. You begin
to think about how important it is that when we confront the enemy we
defeat the enemy. (Applause.)

We have a fundamental disagreement in Washington, D.C. on this central
front in the war on terror. Most Democrats -- most leading Democrats argue
we should pull our troops out of Iraq -- some, right away; others, in just
a few months, even if the terrorists have not been defeated. Others
recommend moving our troops to an island 5,000 miles away. Nineteen House
Democrats introduced legislation that would cut off funds for our troops in
Iraq. All these programs have one thing in common -- they would have our
country quit in Iraq before the job is done. That's why they are the party
of cut and run.

The United States of America will support our allies in Iraq. We will stand
with the 12 million people who demanded freedom at the ballot box. Our goal
of Iraq that can defend itself and govern itself and sustain itself and an
ally in the war on terror is an important goal. We will give our commanders
the flexibility they need to continue to change the tactics to achieve that
goal. We will fight, we will stay, and we will win in Iraq. (Applause.)

And I want to thank Senator Allen's stand. This is tough, this is a tough
fight. It's a tough fight when we see carnage on our television screens.
It's a tough fight when somebody you know has volunteered to serve the
United States and doesn't come home. It's tough. But it's tough for a
reason: because the enemy understands the stakes in Iraq. They have
ambitions. And it's up to this generation to stand with our troops, to put
forth a strategy for victory; to not abandon those voices in the Middle
East, the millions of people who simply want to live in peace. This is the
calling of our time.

You know, the Democrat Party made a clear statement about the nature of
their party when it came to how they dealt with Senator Joe Lieberman. He's
a three-term Democrat from Connecticut who supports completing the mission
in Iraq. He took a strong, principled stand, and he was purged from the
Democrat Party.

Think about what it means. Six years ago, the Democrats thought that Joe
Lieberman was a good enough man and a good enough politician to run as the
Vice Presidential candidate. Now, because he supports victory in Iraq for
the sake of security in the United States, they don't think he's fit to be
in their party. There's only one position in the Democratic Party that
everybody seems to agree on. If you want to be a Democrat these days, you
can be for almost anything, but victory in Iraq is not an option.

These are serious times. It requires steadfast leadership, strong
determination. People like George Allen need to be reelected to stand
strongly with our troops, the voices that desire peace. We'll stay on the
offense. We will keep the enemy on the run. We will do the hard fight now
so a generation of Americans can grow up in peace. We've got fantastic
assets on our side. We've got a military that will get all the support and
training they need to defend the American people.

We also have the power of liberty. Freedom is a powerful force. You know, I
like to tell people about an interesting experience I had. That's when I
went to Elvis' place -- (laughter) -- with the then sitting Prime Minister
of Japan. I went down there. I'd never been to Elvis' place. I thought it
would be interesting to go there. (Laughter.) Prime Minister Koizumi wanted
to go to Elvis' place because he loves Elvis. (Laughter.)

But I wanted to tell a story, and I'm going to tell it to you right quick,
the reason I went. You might remember my dad, and I know some of your
relatives fought the Japanese as a sworn enemy. (Applause.) There was a lot
of kids in the early '40s that signed up to fight the Japanese. They had
attacked us, and this country was going to defend ourselves.

I find it amazing, and I hope you do, too, that the son of Navy Pilot
George H.W. Bush, the sitting President of the United States, is on Air
Force One, flying down with the Prime Minister of the former enemy talking
about the peace. We're talking about North Korea, how we can work together
to convince the leader in North Korea to give up his nuclear weapons
ambitions. We're talking about the fact that Japan had a thousand troops in
Iraq because Prime Minister Koizumi and I know that freedom is how you
defeat an ideology of hatred; that we understand that when you encourage
liberty to flourish where it hadn't flourished, it provides hope. It helps
defeat those who prey on hopelessness.

It's an amazing conversation. I've had several with him. But every time I
have sat down with him, I find it interesting fact of history that my dad
fought the Japanese, and today his son is working to keep the peace.
Something happened. Japan adopted a Japanese-style democracy. It's -- the
example is liberty has the capacity to change an enemy into an ally.
Liberty has the capacity to turn a region of hate into a region of
compassion. Some day an American President will be sitting down talking
about the peace with duly-elected leaders from the Middle East, and a
generation of Americans will be better off.

God bless. (Applause.)

END 6:01 P.M. EDT

===========================================================================
Return to this article at:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/10/20061019-9.html

 * Origin: (1:3634/12)