Text 2205, 139 rader
Skriven 2015-04-30 11:10:00 av Ed Vance (13879.windowsa)
   Kommentar till text 2197 av Holger Granholm (2:20/228)
Ärende: Re: film camera
=======================
04-28-15 16:05 Holger Granholm wrote to Ed Vance about Re: film camera

 HG> @MSGID: <5540B506.13875.windowsa@capcity2.synchro.net>
 HG> In a message dated 04-22-15, Ed Vance said to Holger Granholm:

 HG> Hi Ed,
Howdy! Holger,

 HG> Please note that despite the above date your msg arrived here
 HG> today.

Last night I was planning on answering this message after I answered
Daryl's but it was late and I turned the pc off before sending the .REP
packet.

So this morning I finally found the ROUNDTUIT to do it.
The Date/Time of those two messages will tell all.

 EV> From what I learned of the Kino Camera You get 144 images on a
 EV> 36 Exposure roll of 35mm Film.

 HG> There's a difference here between Film (Cinema) and Kino
 HG> camera. A Kino camera uses the same type of film (raw material)
 HG> as a cinema camera. The difference is that the Kino type of
 HG> camera takes still pictures and a Cinema camera makes running
 HG> pictures of a sequence thereby a cinema.

I didn't notice the Camera Brand that I looked at wasn't a regular Kino
Camera, I thought all Kino Cameras worked with a crank on the side to
take images one after the other as the crank was turned.
My mistake in not reSearching further about it.

 EV> I usually always purchased Etkachrome film that took 36 photos
 EV> because I liked the Bluish Tone it had compared to the Yellowish
 EV> Tone that Kodachrome film has.

 HG> My farther was a fan of Agfa film material, probably because it
 HG> had "softer" colours than Kodachrome for the diapositives he
 HG> made.

 HG> I have previously used Kodachrome but lately mostly Fuji film
 HG> material.

When I was in Japan I bought a roll of Fuji B&W film.
I was afraid to buy their Color film because I didn't know where I
could get it processed, me being on a ship that wouldn't be in the area
later on.

I figured B&W could be processed by the Mail Order Company that I sent
my Color film to, and at least I would have some photos of the place
that I was at then.

 EV> Plus Etkachrome was ASA(ISO?) 32 compared to ASA 10 for Kodachrome,
 EV> I liked having the little extra light sensitivity, I think that is
 EV> what the difference is.

In the 1960's Kodak made a Ektachrome film with a higher speed (ASA),
so I bought a roll of it to try out.

I took photos of Aircraft Launches and Landings one day and was worried
that the photos would be overexposed even while I had my camera set at
1/300 f/16 (the fastest shutter speed and narrowest iris opening for my
Argus C3 camera).

Those slides looked perfect when I received them back from the
processing lab I mailed them to. Boy was I glad to learn that I could
use that new faster film in Daylight.

 HG> I don't recall having seen Ektachrome (note the spelling) but
 HG> it may have slipped my mind since I've never used that
 HG> material.

Thanks for the correction, those first two letters in Ektachrome being
meant to say "Eastman Kodak", I've been pronouncing it Et-ka-chrome for
so long I didn't realize I was making TYPOS, but You got my attention
that I was misspelling the film brand name.
I'll now have to try remembering the correct spelling, Thanks!

 EV> The Kino Camera I looked at on the Internet would get 144 pictures
 EV> on a 36 exposure roll, the images were 8.(something)mm X 24mm.
 EV> That camera looked like it had a crank on the side to turn to make a
 EV> picture a "Click At A Time", I was thinking it could be used to make
 EV> a very short Movie if the crank was turned until the last exposure
 EV> was taken on the roll.

 HG> Oh yes, I recall those projectors that were available to the
 HG> public in "old time" amusement establishments. That must have
 HG> been btwn 1940-50. You put in a dime (or whatever it was) and
 HG> then you could turn a crank and enjoy a short movie sequence.

I think/thought what I was looking at was a current model that was
still being sold, instead of antique stuff.
It didn't look anything like the big machines in the Penny Arcade at
the amusement park that I dropped many pennies in during my youth.
-snip-
 EV> BTW, talking about 36 exposure rolls of Film:
 EV> When I was in Japan I bought a Olympus Pen-EE S Camera that took
 EV> "Single Frame" photos, 18mm X 24mm, and gave me 72 pictures on a 36
 EV> exposure roll.

 HG> Yeah, that is half the size of a normal handheld camera using
 HG> the cinema type of film.

The camera used normal 35mm Roll Film, it just moved the film half the
distance since the hole where the image was placed on the film was half
the normal size.

Now, my mind is trying to remember what size of image was on the reels
of 35mm film which I put on the projectors when I was working as a
Projectionist at a Movie Theater.

I'm wanting to think the image was the same size as the Pen-EE S camera
made, but I'm not going  to stop writing this message and look on Wiki
to learn about it.
I'll do that after this packet is sent.

 EV> -- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux
 EV>  * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938
 EV> (1:2320/105.1)

 HG> OK that's probably the reason for the delayed delivery.

The BBS that Mike has can be connected by Dial-Up, Telnet or the
Internet, three ways.

He showed me that I could use FTP instead of Telnet to get/put my
packet(s), since I had difficulty using Telnet for QWK, and the
Internet Portal didn't allow QWK handling, only Reading and Writing. 

I noticed that Mike's Origin Line is showing his old address,
instead of the CAPCITY2.SBBS address.
I will tell him about that. Thanks for showing the Origin Line to me.
Your and Wilfred's replies are showing that old Origin Line, Thanks!,
I know Mike would want to get that corrected.

... Have you checked your smoke detector batteries & Fire Ext, LATELY?!
--- MultiMail/MS-DOS v0.49
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux
 * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)