Text 8753, 60 rader
Skriven 2006-09-21 18:26:00 av Robert E Starr JR (9250.babylon5)
Ärende: Re: My presidential pick
================================
  * * * This message was from Carl to rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.m * * *   
         * * * and has been forwarded to you by Lord Time * * *         
            -----------------------------------------------             

@MSGID: <a8mdnWJT_KOluo7YnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@comcast.com>
@REPLY: <ka96h2l8o2asl5rsgvgretarm1b0e73oaf@4ax.com>


Wesley Struebing wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:37:33 GMT, Amy Guskin <aisling@fjordstone.com>
> wrote:
> 
>>>> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 09:53:08 -0400, Rob Perkins wrote
>> (in article <4nfjq5F9rpdjU1@individual.net>):
>>
>>> Amy Guskin wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 23:36:39 -0400, Vorlonagent wrote
>>>> (in article <86SdnUjGE9w6lY_YnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@comcast.com>):
>>>>
>>>>> That said, Ms. Clinton's crucial measure is if she can rise beyond the 
>>>>> idology of her party to control terroism, which would be easier for her 
>>>>> than 
>>>>> any republican.  There's a whol media establishment that will give her a 
>>>>> pass that would never let up on a republican. <<
>>>>
>>>> This was a joke, right?  Because every study ever done on the subject by 
>>>> non-partisan interested groups has shown that the Clintons have garnered 
>>>> more 
>>>> negative press per capita (per 'offense' if you prefer) than ANYONE else
in 
>>>> politics, ever.  While I just read something at Media Matters yesterday 
>>>> about 
>>>> how Bush repeatedly gets a pass from the press, specifically on his low 
>>>> poll 
>>>> ratings (he's as low as Nixon ever got, but all the press wants to say is 
>>>> how 
>>>> he's doing fine, and in fact got a bump from his 9/11 speech).
>>> Buh?
>>>
>>> I'll bet there are a hundred ways to spin those studies, separating out 
>>> bad press due to policy, bad press due to person, etc etc. <<
>> Maybe so, but historically low polling numbers are historically low polling 
>> numbers.  Here's the article, if you're interested:
>>
>> http://mediamatters.org/columns/200609190002
>>
> I find it interesting (and somewhat worry-making) that today there was
> an article about how the Dems are beginning to be dismissed and are
> running scared again, because we're getting into the October "freeze
> on candidate choices" and Bush's poll numbers are significantly UP
> again (it seems mostly due to that execrable 9/11 thing that was aired
> - at least that's the only thing that the pollsters could come up with
> to explain the swing.) For some reason, his numbers that were in the
> abysmal 30's are now well over 40 again.


Gas prices are way down again?
   
--- SBBSecho 2.11-Win32
 * Origin: Time Warp of the Future BBS - Home of League 10 (1:14/400)