Text 1665, 106 rader
Skriven 2007-03-14 13:17:42 av alexander koryagin
     Kommentar till en text av PETER COGGON (1:123/140)
Ärende: Re: Hello Alexander Par [2/2]
=====================================
message from valid local sender)
From: "alexander koryagin" <koryagin@erec.ru>

F2EP
Hi, PETER COGGON!

[Skipped]
 AK>> But the second one must be an antagonist to fascism. Western
 AK>> democracies were not capable to fight to until death. The Soviet
 AK>> soldier saved the world and just because that he must be respected.
 AK>> The mission of USSR was to save the world from Hitler.

 PC>      That is so true!  Soldiers of the old USSR, really had a bad time
 PC> with Hitler.  My father was in France only to be forced out with what
 PC> remained of the French army at Dunkirk.  He told me, that if there was
 PC> any place in the war with hitler, it was done by the soldiers of the
 PC> USSR where they suffered too many deaths, both civilian and military.
 PC> I was able to see a film on that finally, and it was quite a film
 PC> not for the weak stomach or heart.  My father said they sent from
 PC> England to the People of Stalingrad a special sword to remember their
 PC> battle to save their city.

And the name Stalingrad (the city of Stalin) was highly important. I
strongly believe that if the name fo the city had been another the soviet
army could not have held it in its hands. The same is true when we are
speaking about defence of Leningrad (the city of Lenin).

 AK>> We can imagine sins of Soviet army after WWII as a debt. But it is
 AK>> nothing in compare with what SA had done to the world. Of course some
 AK>> countries, like Estonia for example, were never happy to be released
 AK>> from Hitler. They would have been happier if USSR had been conquered.

 PC>      Alexander, the army had the commissars with them to make sure they
 PC> followed the orders to the letter, and as well communisum to these
 PC> Baltic countrys.  What army has not sins during and after the war?
 PC> The problem was political thinking, who was right and wrong, suspicion
 PC> and whatever to create the years of the Cold War.

Not everyone thinks as you do. For example many people in so called
democratic Estonia are eager to destroy memorials to Soviet Soldier as a
liberator from fascist Germany. The company of hatred has been unleashed by
nationalistic majority of Estonian parlament against memorials.

 PC> You bet, they all wanted the USSR to be conquered and dissolved, and
 PC> communisum destoryed.  They had it good with Hitler, or did they?
 PC> The SS the Gastapo...all were the same as the KGB.

Some, certainly, would have it good with Hitler, for example all Baltic
states, all Eastern Europe, except slavonic states and etc. But we must not
forget that many nations were considered as inferior and they would have
become a target if Hitler had won the war. We of course can imagine poor
picture that the US would begin the war in Europe using atomic boms ... but
if Soviet Union had collapsed quickly (as it must be if it had been a usual
state) the US had not enough time to develope enough bombs. And the US would
have become the primary target as Hitler knew about developing of the atomic
weapon in the US.

 AK>> I think leadership of one person in Al-Qaeda is exaggerated. Any
 AK>> undeground orgainization is like manyhead hydra from the Greek
 AK>> Mythology. The more heads are cut off the stronger, more dangerous and
 AK>> cautious became the beast. That is how, according Darwin evolution,
 AK>> the devils incarnate came to the world.

 PC>   I think they got better organized under Ben Ladin.  He is a real
 PC> general but with problems.  I wonder if he is dead or not.  Whatever
 PC> if and when this is over, he might emerge in a different coat , that
 PC> of a politician who will carry lots of weight, and power.

When the organization has the aim of diversions, and small group is enough
to carry it out, it is simply not necessary to coordinate such an activity.
Everybody knows what to do. The only coordination is a call for example via
Al-Jazira TV to strenthen activity for the particular reason. That's all.
Modern weapon is a problem, but as we see they have it.

 AK>> All what Bush had to do - just to check the presence nuclear weapon
 AK>> industry; that was the main headache for US. But everything he has
 AK>> been doing since the defeat of Saddam are horrible, dangerous and
 AK>> irresponsible actions. Irresponsible, for Bush still are doing things
 AK>> as he wants, and he is using the spilt blood of American soldiers as
 AK>> an umbrella. And the more deaths the wider became an umbrella.

 PC>     Yes.  It means that when I visit relatives in the USA, and make
 PC> my journey to the gave sites, I will see the sad sight of some familys
 PC> young daughter or son...buried there.  Their life over, and the reward
 PC> an American flag.

And I'll repeat that it easy to proof that all deaths od American soldiers
are in vain after defeating of Saddam. Because after completing the
realizable tasks they began do unrealizable. The unability to do
unrealizable tasks forced the US army use more and more forceful method. As
a rezult the situation has been becoming more and more worse. "Not in vain"
obligatory must means a progress. But it cannot be a progress in solving
unrealizable tasks. The democracy in Iraq has never been possible. The only
thing the US was able to do is to spark the civil war for power between
kurds, shia, and sunni.


[...Propera pedem]
Bye PETER!
Alexander
fido7.english-tutor 2007



--- ifmail v.2.15dev5.3
 * Origin: Demos online service (2:5020/400)