Text 1694, 64 rader
Skriven 2007-03-19 11:59:24 av Alexander Koryagin
   Kommentar till text 1679 av Bob Ackley (1:2905/3)
Ärende: Re: Have I written  [2/2]
=================================
message from valid local sender)
From: "Alexander Koryagin" <koryagin@erec.ru>

F2EP
Hi, Bob Ackley! How are you?
on Thursday, 15 of  March, you wrote to alexander koryagin about
"Have I written  [2/2]"

 ak>> I remember, for example, they arrested and extradited
 ak>> Miloshovish to Hague trubunal - the highly unpopular move.

 BA> It was also stupid and in my opinion legally questionable.  The
 BA> actions taken by Milosevic *in* Serbia (and for that matter Hitler
 BA> in 1936-45 Germany, Stalin in the 1930s USSR and Saddam Hussein
 BA> in 1980-2003 Iraq) were all perfectly legal at the time and place the
 BA> actions were taken.  That's not to contend that the actions were moral,
 BA> ethical, humane,  'right' or acceptable by decent people, only that
 BA> they were legal.

By the way during last time there has been a lot civil wars with number of
victims much higher than in civil war which occured when Yugoslavia had
broken apart. You can see now, for example, Danfur in Sudan and some other
African countries. There are millions of victims there but for some reason
the military intervention is not the option. The double standart and
cinicism. It seems to me that there is only one explanation - there is a
force which hates Serbia more than attrocities in Africa.

 BA> [snip]

 ak>>>> Just opposite - the invasion in Afganistan provides best
 ak>>>> agitation among moslems to join Al-Queda.

 BA> Actually, most of the world agreed with the US actions against
 BA> Afghanistan, it was the invasion and conquest of Iraq that has set
 BA> things off in the Middle East.

Nethetheless, I think and repeat that Talib's Afganistan was not a threat to
America. The US got nothing in Afganistan, only done thing worse. They have
not completed a single reasonable task. The US has not caught Bin Laden, has
not destroied Al-Queda, has made Afgan people poorest people in the world,
has made Afganistan the biggest opium exporter in the world and nothing can
be done with it. As you see, that with Taliban the situation could has been
more stable for whole world.

America for long time conducted the policy of expediency. The dictatorship
in the country (for example in Pakistan) is good for America because it will
be worse if this dictatorship fall, and the country plunge into the quite
chaotic perestroyka with the obscure rezult. The invasion to Afganistan is
not less adventurism than invasion to Iraq. There was a calm hive, but now
it is dangerous to turn back round. As for American security it of course
could be strenthened without war.

In short the aim of Bush in Afganistan - REVENGE (for 911, but to those
people who had not done it). The aim of Bush in Iraq - REVENGE (his father
could not topple Saddam). The price - two senceless wars and sea of blood.

[...Oportet vivere]
Bye Bob!
Alexander
fido7.english-tutor 2007


--- ifmail v.2.15dev5.3
 * Origin: Demos online service (2:5020/400)