Text 22270, 76 rader
Skriven 2006-01-13 10:02:15 av Frank Vest (1:124/6308.1)
  Kommentar till text 22240 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
Ärende: Editor's censorship
===========================
On (12 Jan 06) Björn Forsström wrote to Frank Vest...

Hello Björn,

 FV> I read, hear and am told story after story. None with
 FV> answers that can be proven and not all from USA sources. Who the hell
 FV> should I believe??? I don't have the answer to that and I've not found
 FV> anyone that does have the answer.
 BF> It all seems to be a huge cover-up for somthing that can be read about
 BF> in books written by Ludlum or Clancy.

It would be interesting to be around in, say, 500 years to see what
history has to say about this period in time.

 FV> That is what I said. The small group of terrorists have their
 FV> interpretation and the rest have a different interpretation. Sorry if that
 FV> wasn't clear.
 BF> Sorry I misunderstood you.
 BF> I have talked to several muslims and they just can't understand how
 BF> the terrorists can interpret it like they do.

There are so many versions of so many books and so many
interpretations that it is not impossible to find something to support
you point of view or belief.

 BF>  BF>> How many Christians live up to the 10 commandments for example?
 BF> How many  BF>> follows the Bible? Does Bush?
 FV> How can anyone live up to anything when the world, and its people, changes
 FV> daily.... sometimes more often than daily?

 BF> Unfortunatly, some here will never change and that is just as bad.

Anything can be bad or good. It depends on how it is used and the
definition one uses.

 FV> I have no idea of his religious belief or anyone elses belief.
 BF> A true Christian doesn't advocate to do the first slapping and go to
 BF> war for the wrong reason at the wrong enemy.

What is a true christian? Which version of what bible or holy whatever
is being used to define this? Too many variable to be accurate, in my
humble opinion.

 FV> Definitions from Google:
 FV> # marked by excessive enthusiasm for and intense devotion to a cause or
 FV> idea; "rabid isolationist"
 FV> # a person motivated by irrational enthusiasm (as for a cause); "A fanatic
 FV> is one who can't change his mind and won't change the
 FV> subject"--Winston Churchill   wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
 FV> # Fanaticism, from French fanatique or Latin fanaticus 'of a temple,
 FV> inspired by a god'.    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fanatic
 FV> I fit the first one in some cases. The second one fits a lot of this echo.
 FV> :) I kinda like the last one. My fanaticism could make me a god!! :))

 BF> This makes me say that you definatly isn't a fanatic, only a normal
 BF> thinking individual that doesn't listen to just one side before making
 BF> your own opinion.

Maybe. But I can be irrational and overly enthusiastic. I still like
the idea of being a god. :-))

Regards,
Frank


Disclaimer:
 I know you think you understood what I wrote, But I'm not sure that
what you think you read is what I meant.
 The views expressed here are not necessarily the views of those who
disagree with me.
 Well!! Don't just do something! Stand there! :)

... But FidoNet's most basic element is a bulletin board. - Tom Jennings

--- PPoint 3.01
 * Origin: Holy Cow! I'm A Point!! (1:124/6308.1)