Text 27961, 171 rader
Skriven 2006-04-21 09:19:21 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
  Kommentar till text 27893 av Roy Witt (1:1/22)
Ärende: Canadian "Skills"
=========================
 BF>> What went on in USA, sure, but you haven't a Clue<tm> what went on here.
 BF>> Perhaps you need a Clue<tm> Adjustment.

 RW> I think it is you who needs the clue adjustment. We have a very fine
 RW> education system where the facts of WW1 and WW2 are very well documented.
 RW> I take it from your spiel that you were very active in the military during
 RW> WW2...

You very well know I wasn't and neither were you.

 BF>>>>>>  and the right to "educate" or should I say, force,
 RW>>>>> No one is forcing you to read what he says. There is the next key.
 BF>>>> As I use when it comes from him.
 BF>>>> Why don't you do the same when it comes from someone you dislike?
 RW>>> Because they're the only reason I post here.

 BF>> Must be a boring life you have, eh...?

 RW> Not with fools like we have here. They keep me entertained while I'm
 RW> taking time out from my other activities in life. These are just a few of
 RW> the moments I take to have a little fun...

Watching what you and Frank S write is like watching AFV or ADC or even
Friends,
Jerry Springer, Suddenly Susan or whatever on TV. You two really make the world
realize that those series aren't fiction. You two have really proven that.

 BF>> ......but why do *you* then tell *me* to use the next key (see
 BF>> above)?....

 RW> Because you're a whiner and can't handle what goes on here. You might as
 RW> well go sit on  your park bench and imbibe more whiskey...that should keep
 RW> you napping longer.

So, being among the Big Dogs I have to use words like dumass, asshole,
cocksucker and motherfucker like you do?

 BF>>  Don't do what I tell you to do, do as I do, eh...? ...and
 BF>> then you whine..... Strange.

 RW> I'm not the one who's whining about it...you are.

Right!

 RW>>>>> However, if you want to know about WW2, I'd shy away from the schools
 RW>>>>> there in urope, as they seem to have skipped over that part of
 RW>>>>> history.
 BF>>>> You have been told before that it's the winner that writes the history.
 BF>>>> Perhaps we have the right version.
 RW>>> Your country wasn't a winner, they colaborated with the Nazi. You admit
 RW>>> that yourself.

 BF>> I don't have any idea about why they let the Germans transit Sweden and I
 BF>> think that that is still classified.

 RW> LOL! There's only one reason to colaborate with them...other wise it's
 RW> total anilation for the svedes.

That's our black history and nothing I can do to change it just as it is with
some
parts of your own black history so why keep it up?

 BF>> All I know is that I didn't have anything to do with it. But since the
 BF>> 50's we have been colaborating with USA and then that must be as bad,

 RW> Only if you're guilty of killing a few million innocent Jews.

Or 50 000 Iraquis.

 BF>> especially since we are neutral.

 RW> You can't be a collaborator and be neutral all at the same time.

Our forces train with NATO forces but not with WP forces. What does that tell
you?

 BF>> Remember N379P? And now even more countries have agreed to "helping" CIA
 BF>> and USA.

 RW> Do you still believe in that hoax? My my, you sure are easily impressed.

Even Frank S believe it now so that makes you even dumber then he is.

 BF>>>>>> his opinion on to others?
 RW>>>>> Facts are facts, whether or not they're the opinion of someone who's
 RW>>>>> making a valid point is of no concern for the learned or the student.
 BF>>>> His "facts" comes from papers and news from within the US. He wasn't
 BF>>>> here you know so he couldn't speak about any "facts".
 RW>>> So you say. He also says that the facts come from the uropeon war zone.
 RW>>> Second hand of course, but if you can't believe your own brother, who
 RW>>> can you believe?

 BF>> He isn't my brother.

 RW> But he's been telling you about his brother's experience at the front.

A very coloured view and as you said, second hand.

 BF>> And why should we believe him or you, you two don't believe in anything
 BF>> anyone else says and if it should work one way it should even work the
 BF>> other.

 RW> Why should it work, if all we hear from you is untruths?

Since N379P is true and confirmed by several countries, start by believing that
and I can start to believe what you say.

 BF>> Otherweise it isn't a dialouge and that doesn't benifit any of us.

 RW> You're overlooking that fact that you're getting a real education, not one
 RW> of those uropeon style of educations where they leave out the facts and
 RW> fill your brain with bullshit.

As USA have filled yours by saying that N379P never existed?

 BF>> Think I've told you this before but why should you listen. You always
 BF>> know the best.

 RW> I'm glad that you agree.

That one went way above your head.

 BF>> I've never heard a New Foundland or a S:t Bernhard bark but all this

 RW> Then you have less experience than I do. I've had more than one St Bernard
 RW> put both of this front paws on my chest and bark in my face. That was a
 RW> junk yard guard dog.

Trained to bark and guard.

 RW> Another one was on the loose, and I was minding my
 RW> own business, just walking down this lonely country road.

And why was it on the loose? Running away from someone who used to beat
him up? No wonder he would bark at any human being.

 BF>> small miniature poodle/schnauzer/pincher all sounds just like you.

 RW> Nawww, they're whiners, just like you.

Can't you come up with something of your own?

 BF>> Barking for everything without any reason for doing so.

 RW> They're bred to do that, dog expert...

Are poodles bred to bark?
That shows how much you know.

 BF>> Those who you speak about can always be calmed unless the are very well
 BF>> trained to attack.

 RW> I wouldn't bet my 'Sunday going to meetin' pants on that if I were you.
 RW> LOL!

I said: Unless they are very well trained to attack.

 BF>> I've calmed many of then down just by talking nicely to them.

 RW> Sure you have.

Without any problem.

Now to the Big Dogs talk.
Do you know what a Guadalope 69 is?
It's when you jerk off in your armpit and lick it up.

Does that qualify me to be in the Big Dogs group?

---
 * Origin: . (2:203/614.61)