Text 28183, 224 rader
Skriven 2006-04-24 16:20:22 av Roy Witt (1:1/22)
Kommentar till text 27961 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
Ärende: Canadian "Skills"
=========================
21 Apr 06 09:19, Björn Forsström wrote to Roy Witt:
BF>>> What went on in USA, sure, but you haven't a Clue<tm> what went on
BF>>> here. Perhaps you need a Clue<tm> Adjustment.
RW>> I think it is you who needs the clue adjustment. We have a very fine
RW>> education system where the facts of WW1 and WW2 are very well
RW>> documented. I take it from your spiel that you were very active in
RW>> the military during WW2...
BF> You very well know I wasn't and neither were you.
Don't be so sure about that. I could be a reincarnation of someone who
invaded Poland in 1939...
BF>>>>>>> and the right to "educate" or should I say, force,
RW>>>>>> No one is forcing you to read what he says. There is the next
RW>>>>>> key.
BF>>>>> As I use when it comes from him.
BF>>>>> Why don't you do the same when it comes from someone you dislike?
RW>>>> Because they're the only reason I post here.
BF>>> Must be a boring life you have, eh...?
RW>> Not with fools like we have here. They keep me entertained while I'm
RW>> taking time out from my other activities in life. These are just a
RW>> few of the moments I take to have a little fun...
BF> Watching what you and Frank S write
Should give you a real education.
BF> is like watching AFV or ADC or even Friends, Jerry Springer,
BF> Suddenly Susan or whatever on TV. You two really make the world
BF> realize that those series aren't fiction. You two have really proven
BF> that.
Anyone who would make up a stupid conclusion from watching those programs
really needs to find something else to do. They're funny, but that's the
least amount of education about America as you'll find.
BF>>> ......but why do *you* then tell *me* to use the next key (see
BF>>> above)?....
RW>> Because you're a whiner and can't handle what goes on here. You
RW>> might as well go sit on your park bench and imbibe more
RW>> whiskey...that should keep you napping longer.
BF> So, being among the Big Dogs I have to use words like dumass,
BF> asshole, cocksucker and motherfucker like you do?
No, you just have to stop whining. Maybe you should take your fine whiskey
and your park bench and go somewhere else; where you won't make a fool of
yourself.
BF>>> Don't do what I tell you to do, do as I do, eh...? ...and
BF>>> then you whine..... Strange.
RW>> I'm not the one who's whining about it...you are.
BF> Right!
About time you got that straight.
RW>>>>>> However, if you want to know about WW2, I'd shy away from the
RW>>>>>> schools there in urope, as they seem to have skipped over that
RW>>>>>> part of history.
BF>>>>> You have been told before that it's the winner that writes the
BF>>>>> history. Perhaps we have the right version.
RW>>>> Your country wasn't a winner, they colaborated with the Nazi. You
RW>>>> admit that yourself.
BF>>> I don't have any idea about why they let the Germans transit Sweden
BF>>> and I think that that is still classified.
RW>> LOL! There's only one reason to colaborate with them...other wise
RW>> it's total anilation for the svedes.
BF> That's our black history and nothing I can do to change it just as it
BF> is with some parts of your own black history so why keep it up?
Black history? LOL!
BF>>> All I know is that I didn't have anything to do with it. But since
BF>>> the 50's we have been colaborating with USA and then that must be
BF>>> as bad,
RW>> Only if you're guilty of killing a few million innocent Jews.
BF> Or 50 000 Iraquis.
Who killed them? Certainly not American or coolition troops...look at
their towels wrapped around their heads the next time they show them on
TV...
BF>>> especially since we are neutral.
RW>> You can't be a collaborator and be neutral all at the same time.
BF> Our forces train with NATO forces but not with WP forces. What does
BF> that tell you?
Your troops are chickenshits.
BF>>> Remember N379P? And now even more countries have agreed to
BF>>> "helping" CIA and USA.
RW>> Do you still believe in that hoax? My my, you sure are easily
RW>> impressed.
BF> Even Frank S believe it now so that makes you even dumber then he is.
Oh? I don't recall Frank stating that he believes it. I'm sure that's just
another assumption on your part.
BF>>>>>>> his opinion on to others?
RW>>>>>> Facts are facts, whether or not they're the opinion of someone
RW>>>>>> who's making a valid point is of no concern for the learned or
RW>>>>>> the student.
BF>>>>> His "facts" comes from papers and news from within the US. He
BF>>>>> wasn't here you know so he couldn't speak about any "facts".
RW>>>> So you say. He also says that the facts come from the uropeon war
RW>>>> zone. Second hand of course, but if you can't believe your own
RW>>>> brother, who can you believe?
BF>>> He isn't my brother.
RW>> But he's been telling you about his brother's experience at the
RW>> front.
BF> A very coloured view and as you said, second hand.
You're getting it second hand. He got it first hand from his brother, who
was there.
BF>>> And why should we believe him or you, you two don't believe in
BF>>> anything anyone else says and if it should work one way it should
BF>>> even work the other.
RW>> Why should it work, if all we hear from you is untruths?
BF> Since N379P is true and confirmed by several countries, start by
BF> believing that and I can start to believe what you say.
Sorry, I can't believe a bunch of pikers...and I certainly don't care if
you're too dumb to realize you've been duped by those pikers.
BF>>> Otherweise it isn't a dialouge and that doesn't benifit any of us.
RW>> You're overlooking that fact that you're getting a real education,
RW>> not one of those uropeon style of educations where they leave out
RW>> the facts and fill your brain with bullshit.
BF> As USA have filled yours by saying that N379P never existed?
The facts bear me out. I find none to support what you're saying. Does
that make you a liar or stupid?
BF>>> Think I've told you this before but why should you listen. You
BF>>> always know the best.
RW>> I'm glad that you agree.
BF> That one went way above your head.
No, it was very clear what you meant. Apparently you got no sense of
sarcasm in my reply...tit for tat.
BF>>> I've never heard a New Foundland or a S:t Bernhard bark but all
BF>>> this
RW>> Then you have less experience than I do. I've had more than one St
RW>> Bernard put both of this front paws on my chest and bark in my face.
RW>> That was a junk yard guard dog.
BF> Trained to bark and guard.
No, he was just mad because I disturbed his dinner.
RW>> Another one was on the loose, and I was minding my
RW>> own business, just walking down this lonely country road.
BF> And why was it on the loose?
Because it was in the country, where dogs are allowed to roam freely, like
they're supposed to.
BF> Running away from someone who used to beat him up?
Hardly, perhaps guarding the homestead...
BF> No wonder he would bark at any human being.
Making such assumptions only makes and ass of you.
BF>>> small miniature poodle/schnauzer/pincher all sounds just like you.
RW>> Nawww, they're whiners, just like you.
BF> Can't you come up with something of your own?
Whiner is my own. I invented it, ages ago. "Want some cheese with that
whine?"
BF>>> Barking for everything without any reason for doing so.
RW>> They're bred to do that, dog expert...
BF> Are poodles bred to bark?
No, that's just their nature...they're scared shitless of their own
shadow, so they bark...
BF> That shows how much you know.
Which is more than you know.
BF>>> Those who you speak about can always be calmed unless the are very
BF>>> well trained to attack.
RW>> I wouldn't bet my 'Sunday going to meetin' pants on that if I were
RW>> you. LOL!
BF> I said: Unless they are very well trained to attack.
Some dogs have a mean nature. Take the Doberman for instance. It will
attack for no reason.
BF>>> I've calmed many of then down just by talking nicely to them.
RW>> Sure you have.
BF> Without any problem.
LOL!
BF> Now to the Big Dogs talk.
Coming from a poodle's point of view, of course.
BF> Do you know what a Guadalope 69 is?
No, but I have a feeling you're going to tell me.
BF> It's when you jerk off in your armpit and lick it up.
So, you perform the Guadalope 69 on a regular basis and you you know for
sure. Interesting.
BF> Does that qualify me to be in the Big Dogs group?
No, you're too stupid to belong int he Big Dogs group.
Roy
--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000
* Origin: Hacienda de Rio de Guadalupe * South * Texas, USA * (1:1/22)
|