Text 28278, 191 rader
Skriven 2006-04-25 21:32:29 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
  Kommentar till text 28183 av Roy Witt (1:1/22)
Ärende: Canadian "Skills"
=========================
 RW>>> military during WW2...
 BF>> You very well know I wasn't and neither were you.

 RW> Don't be so sure about that. I could be a reincarnation of someone who
 RW> invaded Poland in 1939...

You certainly have the same stupid ideas, to know best and rule the world.
And look what happend to him, go and do the same.

 BF>> Watching what you and Frank S write

 RW> Should give you a real education.

The only thing I've learned from you is to behave like a real asshole.

 BF>>  is like watching AFV or ADC or even Friends, Jerry Springer,
 BF>> Suddenly Susan or whatever on TV. You two really make the world realize
 BF>> that those series aren't fiction. You two have really proven that.

 RW> Anyone who would make up a stupid conclusion from watching those programs
 RW> really needs to find something else to do. They're funny, but that's the
 RW> least amount of education about America as you'll find.

Apart from you, they are at least funny.

 BF>> So, being among the Big Dogs I have to use words like dumass, asshole,
 BF>> cocksucker and motherfucker like you do?

 RW> No, you just have to stop whining. Maybe you should take your fine whiskey
 RW> and your park bench and go somewhere else; where you won't make a fool of
 RW> yourself.

Now you're again telling me not to do as you do but as you say.

 BF>>>>  Don't do what I tell you to do, do as I do, eh...? ...and
 BF>>>> then you whine..... Strange.
 RW>>> I'm not the one who's whining about it...you are.
 BF>> Right!

 RW> About time you got that straight.

I didn't expect you to understand that.

 BF>> That's our black history and nothing I can do to change it just as it is
 BF>> with some parts of your own black history so why keep it up?

 RW> Black history? LOL!

See above.

 BF>>>> All I know is that I didn't have anything to do with it. But since the
 BF>>>> 50's we have been colaborating with USA and then that must be as bad,
 RW>>> Only if you're guilty of killing a few million innocent Jews.
 BF>> Or 50 000 Iraquis.

 RW> Who killed them? Certainly not American or coolition troops...look at
 RW> their towels wrapped around their heads the next time they show them on
 RW> TV...

Did they commit suicide?

 BF>>>> especially since we are neutral.
 RW>>> You can't be a collaborator and be neutral all at the same time.
 BF>> Our forces train with NATO forces but not with WP forces. What does that
 BF>> tell you?

 RW> Your troops are chickenshits.

Trained by chickens?

 BF>>>> Remember N379P? And now even more countries have agreed to "helping"
 BF>>>> CIA and USA.
 RW>>> Do you still believe in that hoax? My my, you sure are easily impressed.
 BF>> Even Frank S believe it now so that makes you even dumber then he is.

 RW> Oh? I don't recall Frank stating that he believes it. I'm sure that's just
 RW> another assumption on your part.

Now is the time for him to speak up and show that he's the man he claims to be.
If he doesn't he will show that he's the lying SOB we say he is and if he speak
up,
it will show what a moron you are. Tough choice eh..... Wonder what it will be
but
this time will be the the first he doesn't answer I guess.

 BF>> A very coloured view and as you said, second hand.

 RW> You're getting it second hand. He got it first hand from his brother, who
 RW> was there.

And all those who have appeared in documentaries on TV are lying?

  BF>> Since N379P is true and confirmed by several countries, start by
 BF>> believing that and I can start to believe what you say.

 RW> Sorry, I can't believe a bunch of pikers...and I certainly don't care if
 RW> you're too dumb to realize you've been duped by those pikers.

Let's just see what your buddy says about the above, shall we?

 BF>> As USA have filled yours by saying that N379P never existed?

 RW> The facts bear me out. I find none to support what you're saying. Does
 RW> that make you a liar or stupid?

It more tells that you are unable to believe anything else then what you
believe is true.

 BF>>>> I've never heard a New Foundland or a S:t Bernhard bark but all this
 RW>>> Then you have less experience than I do. I've had more than one St
 RW>>> Bernard put both of this front paws on my chest and bark in my face.
 RW>>> That was a junk yard guard dog.
 BF>> Trained to bark and guard.

 RW> No, he was just mad because I disturbed his dinner.

Rule #1. Never disturb a dog while eating.
Even you should know that.

 RW>>> Another one was on the loose, and I was minding my own business, just
 RW>>> walking down this lonely country road.

 BF>> And why was it on the loose?

 RW> Because it was in the country, where dogs are allowed to roam freely, like
 RW> they're supposed to.

Not here. Thay will disturb and hunt deers.

 BF>> Running away from someone who used to beat him up?
 RW> Hardly, perhaps guarding the homestead...

 BF>>  No wonder he would bark at any human being.
 RW> Making such assumptions only makes and ass of you.

Pity he didn't bite yours.

  BF>>>> Barking for everything without any reason for doing so.
 RW>>> They're bred to do that, dog expert...

 BF>> Are poodles bred to bark?

 RW> No, that's just their nature...they're scared shitless of their own
 RW> shadow, so they bark...

First you say they are bred to bark and then they aren't.
How shall it be, dog expert?
Talk about making an ass of one self.

 BF>> I said: Unless they are very well trained to attack.

 RW> Some dogs have a mean nature. Take the Doberman for instance. It will
 RW> attack for no reason.

Some, yes. Those where the elevator doesn't go to top floor or are trained
to attack and even a mean Golen Retriver can go to attack.

 BF>>>> I've calmed many of then down just by talking nicely to them.
 RW>>> Sure you have.
 BF>> Without any problem.
 RW> LOL!

You should try it. Sit down, look the other way and slowly reach out an arm
towards the dog. All hostility is gone with the wind and you have woken up
the dogs natural curiosity and he will come in peace.

 BF>> Now to the Big Dogs talk.

 RW> Coming from a poodle's point of view, of course.

The last poll I did contained, perhaps 50 posts from you, so I'm wonder who
the poodle is here.
And the day before that it was Frank who had 50 postings.

 BF>> Do you know what a Guadalope 69 is?
 BF>> It's when you jerk off in your armpit and lick it up.

 RW> So, you perform the Guadalope 69 on a regular basis and you you know for
 RW> sure. Interesting.

I got that from GWB:s illegal wire-tapping log.

 BF>> Does that qualify me to be in the Big Dogs group?

 RW> No, you're too stupid to belong int he Big Dogs group.

Somehow I think it's better for me to stay out of it, knowing who the alfa
males are.

---
 * Origin: . (2:203/614.61)