Text 2993, 80 rader
Skriven 2004-12-07 19:56:24 av mark lewis (1:3634/12)
   Kommentar till text 2887 av Michiel van der Vlist (2:280/5555)
Ärende: Science 1/2
===================
 >>>>MV> Now will you follow  Jack's ruling and refrain from posting?
 >>
 >>>> Which of course doesnt relieve /YOU/ from doing your part
 >>>> in not contributing to the discourse, wouldnt you agree?
 >>
 >>  MvdV> Eh? How did you get the idea that /I/ have such an obligation?

 >> ummm... self-moderation and not contributing to off-topic
 >> discussions are the first things that come to mind... you
 >> have just as much responsibility as anyone else...

 MvdV> I am not the one complaining about off-topic messages.

doesn't matter... you are one of those espousing back-seat moderating and yet,
you're not doing it but instead are adding to the off-topic messages and not
practicing that fantabulous self-moderation, either... are you assisting in
making the point??

 >>  MvdV> I did not ask for moderator action.

 >> you don't have to... you didn't self-moderate and you did
 >> contribute to the off-topic discussion...

 MvdV> Oh, but I do self moderate. I do not use foul language, I do
 MvdV> not intentionally abuse, and regarding oof topic messages, I
 MvdV> do not consider it off topic.

hahahaha... excellent job of double-speak... why do you not consider it
off-topic when others do?

 >>  MvdV> I do not recognise Jack as moderator, I have not
 >>  MvdV> obligation to follow his orders.

 >> so what... you are obligated to follow bjorn's rules,
 >> though... so do so!

 MvdV> I do.

not as far as i can see with the (supposed?) off-topic discussions nor with
self-moderation... BTW: self-moderation doesn't mean only not using vulgar or
foul language... BTW2: what is vulgar or foul language? who decides what is
vulgar or foul?

 >>>> It takes two to tango and it wasnt /just/ the Zone One
 >>>> troublemakers doing the dancing.

 >>  MvdV> I wasn't the one provoking moderator action.

 >> but you were one of those contributing to the off-topic
 >> discussion and thus also fall under any moderation done on
 >> the off-topic discussion...

 MvdV> The discussion was not off topic from my POV.

ok...

 >>  MvdV> But now that you bring it up: why do /you/ ignore Jack's edict
 >>  MvdV> that declares the subject off-topic? Do you not recognise Jack
 >>  MvdV> as moderator?

 >> why are you not self-moderating?

 MvdV> That is not an answer to my question.

 >> you know the discussion is off-topic...

 MvdV> Do I?

sure you do... especially when you see others stating that it is off-topic ;)

 >> yes, so do i... why am i participating? beause you are ;)

 MvdV> Lame excuse. You are ignoring the edict of the one you claim
 MvdV> is moderator.

no moreso than you are... pot/kettle/black ;)

)\/(ark

 * Origin: (1:3634/12)