Text 41120, 65 rader
Skriven 2006-10-11 22:02:16 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
  Kommentar till text 41084 av Jeff Smith (1:14/0)
Ärende: DUD-file
================

 BF>> So just because I am a simple person with a common sence makes me an easy
 BF>> victim of bullying? I think that says more about them than it does about
 BF>> me don't you think?


 JS>      Could be. I have also noticed that occasionally too over the
 JS> years. I sometimes have a rather simple view of things. A view based more
 JS> on simple principles than anything else. It helps avoid the playing of
 JS> games that many people seem to like to do. An unfortunate result is that
 JS> some people look at that as weakness in me that they can then exploit.

After having seen the last development here my commom sence tells me to
get the hell out of here and let this be a read only echo for a while.


 JS>>>      There isn't the same type of behavior in the other echos
 JS>>> because there is a degree of respect for the echo.

 BF>> No. It's  the respect for other people.

 JS>      To a degree maybe. I think it is more a degree of respect for the
 JS> echo. People I would imagine continue to have the same basic feelings
 JS> feelings. But based on the echo they are in they hold those feelings in
 JS> check. At least until that can get back to this echo. <g>

And how do you plan to change all those feelings that have been cemented
for over four years?

  BF>> Does this people even have one behavior at home and another at work?
Then
 BF>> they have a split personality and should seek help from Dr Phil.

 JS>      I fear shock therapy might be needed for some. Years ago when I
 JS> worked
 JS> as an electrician I used to ge.. get.. the.. them.. on a da.. daily basis.
 JS> <g>

Is that so? I've had a few myself.

 BF>> In KOFFEE_KLATCH for example we don't even have a moderator but people
 BF>> STILL behave. How about that?
 BF>> We don't need anyone telling us what to say, do or behave. We can think
 BF>> for ourself dammit!!!!

 JS>      That is good. That is possible with some echos. With others either
 JS> because of prior history or the way that it was moderated. The echo needs
 JS> direction and maintenance. Also echos where there is a higher likelyhood
 JS> of differing opinions and views a moderator is more often needed.

Whatever you say but I still put the most blaim on the participants.

  BF>> This echo more reflect what people let themself to do, not what the
 BF>> moderator let them to do.

 JS>     People here let themselves do as they please because they 1) see that
 JS> there is a moderator that doesn't care. 2) See that the moderator breaks
 JS> his own rules. 3) Lets his personal views show through in his moderating
 JS> of the echo.

Then those are advocating chaos and that's nothing anyone but themself
that change that so I leave you all to it.

---
 * Origin: . (2:203/614.61)