Text 43956, 104 rader
Skriven 2006-12-12 08:16:36 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
  Kommentar till text 43937 av Ross Cassell (1:123/456)
Ärende: Insults
===============

 RC>>> The "euro" consternation with Shannon has everything to do with his long
 RC>>> standing criticism of Felten in his capacity of the Fidonews editor, in
 RC>>> the way he has conducted himself and handled those duties.

 BF>> I don't care if it was you, Shannon, Wayne, Roy or Felten that had put
 BF>> those words on an anonomyous coward website, you would all have gotten
 BF>> the same treatment. Acting like that is just as low a person can sink.

 RC> Quit being such a baby about it..

So acting like that is totally OK by you? Thought you said it wasn't.

 RC> Each of us can find a website with content that offends us, its not that
 RC> hard to do.

 RC> Try this one on for size:

 RC> http://www.godhatesfags.com

 RC> I find everything about them people (associated with that organization),
 RC> offensive, but the reality is, they have the same rights that I or you do.

But I don't see MY name on any of those sites, do you?

 BF>> Haven't you read that I've said that he can have whatever shit he wants
 BF>> on his coward website as long as he put his name under his words? And
 BF>> then he can be a Muslem, Jew or whatever but stand for what you say.

 RC> Actually, he, you or anyone else can put up a website and publish on it
 RC> anything they damn well please.

And why did you then had a problem with Feltens site?
And if Shannon had been here in Sweden I would have left it to a lawer and I
think that he wouldn't have gotten away with it.

 RC>>> Since Shannon paid for the software he uses, pays for the computer he
 RC>>> runs it on, pays for the internet connectivity he uses, why should you
 RC>>> give a flying phuck what he puts on his computer, are you inferring you
 RC>>> have some financial stake in Shannons setup, therefore giving you some
 RC>>> kind of say over it or him?

 BF>> <SIGH>
 BF>> Would YOU like if I put up an anonomyous website and twisted your words
 BF>> so you would look like a gay leftwing anarchist?

 RC> First off, Shannons web site is hardly anonymous .

Where do you see his name on that site? Please show me!

 RC> Secondly as to your question, I wouldnt like it, but if that happened to
 RC> me, please elaborate on the steps available to me to remedy the situation?

I'm not sure what you mean here so I ask you to explain it before I answer.

 RC> Maybe you are giving this matter more attention that it deserves?

It wasn't me who published that shit on a website. He did it in pure and simple
retaliation, he have said so himself in a netmail and that guy represent the
American military and say he's a Christian. Nice dudes you have, eh.........

 BF>> See, I told you. You don't see a thing. Are you as stubborn and stupid as
 BF>> Shannon?

 RC> and why is Shannon stupid, because you say so?

How else can his behaviour be explained after having been asked over 20 times
to put his name under his words? Either he is the fucking coward I say he is or
he must be very very stupid. Pick a choise.

 BF>> How many times do I have to tell you that this have absolutly *nothing*
 BF>> to do with anything else, no matter how much you try to twist it to suit
 BF>> your purpose. YOU made a racistic comment and Shannon gladly jumped on
 BF>> the famous band-wagon.

 RC> What racist comment?

 RC> Oh wait, you are a mind reader now? I see..

Oh, jeeezzzz........are you just playing stupid or what?

 RC> So this is about me now, not Shannons website?

YOU did the connection between me and the thing between Shannon
and Felten, not me, so naturally it's about YOU now since he haven't mentioned
it.

 RC> You are all over the place Mr Forsström, you are starting to sound like a
 RC> blithering idiot, please say it isnt so!

As I've told you below, you are already sounding like Roy.

 BF>>>> You start to sound more like Roy for every day.

 RC>>> No, I havent said you had shit oozing from your mouth yet..

 BF>> There is still time you know. In your reply to this for example.

 RC> I dont have to, you are doing such a fine job all by yourself.. ;)

Two of a kind then.

---
 * Origin: . (2:203/614.61)