Text 45070, 49 rader
Skriven 2006-12-26 19:47:59 av Dan Ceppa (1:138/666.0)
     Kommentar till en text av Roy Witt
Ärende: The moderator here????
==============================
-> On 25 Dec 06  11:49:24, Roy Witt got back to Dan Ceppa 
-> Re: The moderator here????

 DC> I think it can be listed as MOD, MOD, MOD, but that can cause
 DC> confusion.  COMOD, COMOD, COMOD may also be acceptable.  However,
 DC> the generally used format is MOD, COMOD, COMOD.

 RW> As I recall, having setup an elist with the same echobase program that
 RW> LaCosta uses, there are three slots, mod, co-mod and co-mod...however,
 RW> that doesn't mean that the software won't accept your other versions.
 RW> It's been a long time since I played with it.

I think MOD, MOD, MOD is acceptable...  

 
 DC> The final authority always belongs to the first listed.

 RW> Those are LaCosta's rules, not those of Echobase.

AFAIK, that's the only way it has ever been.  

 DC> posters.  Something like a feed cut would require that the sysop
 DC> about to sever a feed be aware that the person doing the request
 DC> really is the moderator of the Echo.

 RW> And that is the way the NAB works and not necessarily how everyone
 RW> else works.

Or doesn't work at all, in the case of bj.  

 RW> However, I also pointed out that this isn't written is stone, as I've
 RW> severed the feed of a user from read/write to read only, in the face
 RW> of LaCosta listed as the echo's sole moderator.

I'm not sure why he's doing that now, other to keep particular 
Echoes open.  My guess is that if you were a former mod of an 
Echo that he'd hand back the password.  


 DC> Dan Ceppa
 DC> Primary Moderator Emeritus of FIDO_NEWS

 RW> R\%/itt - moderates no one, but noone.



... "Soone there will be noone here to moderate." -- bj
--- OMX/Blue Wave/DOS v2.30
 * Origin: Soundly on the Fault Line (1:138/666.0)