Text 48740, 177 rader
Skriven 2007-03-22 10:33:02 av Roy Witt (1:397/22)
  Kommentar till text 48728 av Stewart Arnett (3:772/100)
Ärende: Any or all
==================
22 Mar 07 19:16, Stewart Arnett wrote to Roy Witt:

 SA> Hello Roy.

 SA> 21 Mar 07 09:54, you wrote to me:

 RW>> 21 Mar 07 18:18, Stewart Arnett wrote to Roy Witt:


 SA>>> And that makes a difference ?

 RW>> When it comes to certain actions performed by the distribution
 RW>> systems in regards to moderator requests, absolutely.

 SA> Not in this echo.

Thus proving that you don't know what you're talking about.

 SA>>>  If the EListing of this echo meant anything regarding moderation
 SA>>> then perhaps it would.

 RW>> See above. When an echomail distributor in Z1 is asked to modify one
 RW>> of it's downlink's status in regards to an abusive user, proof that
 RW>> you're the elisted moderator is always required.

 SA> Z1 means nothing on a scale of one to ten.

In that case, Z3 doesn't exist.

 SA>>>  But, as it doesn't then it makes no difference.

 RW>> An ASSumption on your part. In incorrect one at that.

 SA> And this is an incorect assumption on your part.

English comprehension isn't your strong suit.

 SA>>>>>  When you are the editor of the Snooze, then the incumbent
 SA>>>>> readers will let you moderate,


 RW>> I know otherwise. Most moderating is done in the background, via
 RW>> netmail. Even your hero Felten attempts that on occasion. But he's
 RW>> not very successful.

 SA> This only shows your ignorance, 5/24ths of the population in here
 SA> would ignore Talley but obey the real moderator.

A circular arguement, as Talley is the real moderator.

 SA> The rest would be ignorant!

Like you.


 SA>>> He is nothing more than a jumped up thief who tried to hijack the
 SA>>> echo for his own ends,

 RW>> 'jumped up thief' ? The password to the echolisting was passed to
 RW>> Shannon by the previous elisted moderator.

 SA> Sorry not true.

How does it feel to be totally in the dark?

 SA>>> mainly because he has a rampant and obnoxious hate for anything
 SA>>> European,

 RW>> As do many here. Your point?

 SA> Thanks, you and I agree.

That's your point? There is also a hatred here for everything American.
Does that neutralize the hatreds?

 SA>>> especially the current editor.

 RW>> And many here are of the same opinion.

 SA> Not many, some of the American Z1 group are of that opinion, without
 SA> them there would be no arguments and this echo would have far less
 SA> traffic, Talley is probably the mnost "voice"iferous of that group in
 SA> his hatred.

He's like me, we give what we get. So far you havn't made any good
arguments to convince me otherwise.

 SA>>> All he has achieved is to jump on one or two people who have no
 SA>>> knowledge of his ranking and they have complied.

 RW>> Which is more than anything Felten has done.

 SA> Not true.

Felten's a liar. Very true.

 SA>>>  Should the idiot try to moderate those who do know then he will
 SA>>> have no success.

 RW>> Yes, you and your ilk are off the opinion that no moderator is
 RW>> better than a moderator that has some respect and is somewhat
 RW>> successful.

 SA> Did I say that,

No. I did. It's an arguement against what you said, but you couldn't
understand it. Maybe a 10yo can explain it to you.

 SA>  comprehension 101 is needed on your part. (Geeese
 SA> Roy, you're getting like Reagan got)

 RW>>>>  nto the shit fer brained stupid svede dickhead who claims
 RW>>>> to be.

 SA>>> Whom possibly has kept this echo more active than it has been in
 SA>>> years by skillfully

 RW>> Complete and utter bullshit. Felten hasn't been an active person in
 RW>> the echo, unless he wants to interject more hatred for the USA.

 SA> In the current world climate the US of America is not the most loved
 SA> country,

That's bullshit. You've been suckered by the media and America's cry baby
left wing whackos into believing that. The reality is the world doesn't
hate us; they just love our money and wish they could get their hands on
more of it.

 SA> unfortunately to say it seems China out ranks it in this
 SA> respect. A change of government and policies would alieviate this
 SA> disposition though. (And this is nothing of the fault of the general
 SA> population of your country)

That won't happen anytime soon.

 SA>>> keeping you and the likes of the Talley's churning out verbal and
 SA>>> racist abuse on a daily basis.

 RW>> LOL! Man, Felten's pulled the wool over your eyes. What goes around,
 RW>> comes around wherever Felten is. He breeds hate and discontent and
 RW>> then wants everyone to kiss his ass. Looks like you've got Felten
 RW>> shit on your lips and now it's dripping into this echo.

 SA> See, you've reacted exactly as expected, with verbal drivel.

Which is wonderful stuff, compared to your drivel.

 SA> I seem to recall once you declared here that you were educated,
 SA> somehow I don't think your education came up to much above primary
 SA> school, you don't even know how to insult all that well.

I'm sorry that you're education system has failed you. Maybe you can go
back to that 101 class you mentioned above and try to get some help. If
not, we have an excellent system here that can help you.

 SA> Anyouni Gasehyo.

You're an asshole too?

 RW>> The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant,
 RW>> but that they know so much that isn't so. - Ronald Reagan

 SA> The trouble with Ronald Reagan wasnot that he was ignorant, but that
 SA> he became so liberal with his thoughts he lost his mind.

LOL! And you're so full of shit, it runs out of your mouth.


               R\%/itt



The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but
that they know so much that isn't so. - Ronald Reagan

--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000
 * Origin: SATX Alamo Area Net * South * Texas, USA * (1:397/22)