Text 49559, 129 rader
Skriven 2007-04-17 18:56:38 av Roy Witt (1:397/22)
     Kommentar till en text av bob klahn
Ärende: Headache
================
16 Apr 07 19:30, bob klahn wrote to Roy Witt:

 bk>  ...

 bk>>>>>  With that sort of problem, she shouldn't be working with
 bk>>>>>  children anyway.

 RW>>>> So your prejudices finally come out.

 bk>>>  There is no prejudice there. People who are mentally unstable,

 RW>> That is a prejudice towards mentally unstable people. It's
 RW>> also against the law, just like it's against the law to be
 RW>> a racist.

 bk>  It is not against the law to prevent mentally unstable people
 bk>  from being in a position of authority over children.

But it is against the law to discriminate against them. Which is where I
was going with that thread and seems to have gone over your head.

 bk> Or, for that matter, even working with them at all.

More discrimination.

 bk>  Or do you favor putting children at risk for your personal
 bk>  desire to help a mentally unstable person?

There is a big difference in putting those children at risk by having them
associate with a mentally ill person, in a mental ward and in a classroom
where the Principal, Vice Principal and other teachers check on the class
from time to time. BTW, these weren't children in the sense that they were
small and wouldn't know a mentally ill person from a person deemed to be
not mentally ill.

 bk>>>  which is what you described, should not be allowed in a position
 bk>>>  where they can damage or harm children. How many children are
 bk>>>  you willing to allow be harmed for the benefit of that woman?

 RW>> That woman, had a tenth grade English class where she
 RW>> taught people like Ceppa to speak without stuttering, she
 RW>> took the students who had failed English before being
 RW>> assigned to her class and taught them English like no other
 RW>> teacher they had met in thier scholastic life. Her students
 RW>> were so grateful for her help, they visit her even 20 years
 RW>> after they graduated from high school.

 bk>  So, are you saying she is now mentally unstable?

Yes, her mental state got to be too much for her to continue teaching, so
she quit.

 bk> Your description was of someone seriously unstable.

Now, in the present...

 bk> If it was a trivial variation why did you bring it up?

Her mental illness progressed from an episode a year to several. It got to
the point where she wasn't capable of maintaining her meds, as all Manic
Depressive people do. Once they feel stable, they feel like they don't
need the meds any longer. That eventually results in another episode.

 RW>> You're judging a person because she has a mental disorder
 RW>> that, in your mind, is as crazy as a loon.

 bk>  You are the one who described her as having episodes that
 bk>  disable her.

And you were the one discriminating against her just because she was
mentally unstable.

 bk> You know nothing at all if you think "crazy as a loon" is the
 bk> standard for not working with children.

I've got a lot more experience with it than you could ever hope to have.

 RW>>>> The people like
 RW>>>> Chumpside aren't worthy of equal treatment.

 bk>>>  Fuck you.

 RW>> Sorry, I don't go that way.

 bk>  Yeah, anyone who goes off on a flame like that does go that way.

Thanks for admitting that you're a faggot.

 bk>  You can't carry on any discussion without resorting to flames,
 bk>  can you.

I'm not the one who said 'fuck you'...you're the flamer here.

 bk>>> Don't push that bull shit toward me. Your hate is an acid eating
 bk>>> you from the inside.

 RW>> LOL! There's no hate in me, it's all projected onto

 bk>  ...
 bk>  So, you admit you are projecting. That's a start,

You're just as projective...talk to your therapist...

 bk>>> ... Why do republicans hate America's Veterans so much?  <Alternet>

 RW>> Why do Dems hate America and want to surrender to the
 RW>> terrorists? (See; Congress)

 bk>  It now becomes clear.

It now becomes even clearer...big line of bullshit deleted...

 RW>> Why do Dems fraternize with the
 RW>> enemy? (See; Pelozi)

 bk>  Or the republicans who visited syria before and after Pelozi?

How many of them stooped to their level and wore a burka? Only one,
Pelozi, the American traitor.


The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but
that they know so much that isn't so. - Ronald Reagan


                R\%/itt

--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000
 * Origin: SATX Alamo Area Net * South * Texas, USA * (1:397/22)