Text 8447, 53 rader
Skriven 2005-03-27 12:29:04 av Torbjorn Mohn (2:211/37)
   Kommentar till text 8383 av mark lewis (1:3634/12)
Ärende: NIMBY
=============
>> So you mean it's up to your own moral discression whether you
>> follow the contract or not?
> no, that's not what i said... i said that i think that there should not be a
> problem with running servers if one is not making money from the operation of
> those servers (ie: a hobby)... if one is making money, then yes, i think that
> the provider should get some additional compensation...
> in other words, i think that they are being too limited in their viewpoint of
>servers and their relation to commercial activities... do you run any servers?
>if so, do you make any money with them?? if so, do you pay more because of tha
>factor? do you thing that a hobby _should_ cost hundreds of dollars a month or
> do you think that one should spend what one has to to enjoy that hobby??

But that would be very difficult for them to monitor though. So it's probably
easier for them to draw the line where they have done. My ISP does not care.
They have enough bandwith without having to limit home accounts like that.

>> Strange.. why was his services closed then?
> because some pitiful excuse for a human went far beyond the lines of
> demarcation and way outside the auspices of "gentlemen's disagreement"...

Ah.... is that so?

>> I don't know.
>exactly, thank you... so why are you defending them? you could be next for any
> reason they deem to use to come after you...

I'm not defending them. My position is thet the snitching on BOTH sides is
stupid. You cannot defend the snitching on Bjorn, and then not whyat happened
to Robert?

They are more than welcome to come after me. I have nothing to hide anyway. My
web is my BBS only, and I do not run any systems in breach of the contract with
my ISP.


>> So it's doing dirty work if one notifies somone in Z1 breaking
>> an ISP's contract, but it's not dirty to do a siliar thing
>> against Bjorn?

>where do you come up with these stupid interpretations of what i plainly write
>and state?? i did not say that it was dirty work for one and not the other...
> said that someone is manipulating someone else into doing dirty work... i
> didn't limit it to either side or situation... hell, it could be two someones
>manipulating two other someones, two on one side and two on the other and both
> parties leading everyone else around by the ring in their nose... it appears
> that you are being lead along, too...

Sorry.. I misunderstood.

Torbjorn

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
 * Origin: Circle Of Protection (2:211/37)