Text 25998, 191 rader
Skriven 2009-01-12 22:36:26 av Herman Neut (2:280/1141)
Kommentar till text 25985 av Roy Witt (1:397/22)
Ärende: Ice Age
===============
Hi Roy,
Quoting: Roy Witt to Joe Bruchis
Date/Time: 12-Jan-09 / 09:17:40
Subject: Ice Age
RW> 12 Jan 09 07:00, Jeff Binkley wrote to All:
JB>> * Copied (from: MATZDOBRE) by Joe Bruchis using timEd/386
JB>> 1.10.y2k+.
RW> I wish you would have formatted it to 75 charcters per line.
JB>> http://english.pravda.ru/science/earth/106922-earth_ice_age-0
JB>> Earth on the Brink of an Ice Age
JB>> The earth is now on the brink of entering another Ice Age,
JB>> according to a large and compelling body of evidence from within
JB>> the field of climate science. Many sources of data which provide
JB>> our knowledge base of long-term climate change indicate that the
JB>> warm, twelve thousand year-long Holocene period will rather soon
JB>> be coming to an end, and then the earth will return to Ice Age
JB>> conditions for the next 100,000 years.
JB>> Ice cores, ocean sediment cores, the geologic record, and studies
JB>> of ancient plant and animal populations all demonstrate a regular
JB>> cyclic pattern of Ice Age glacial maximums which each last about
JB>> 100,000 years, separated by intervening warm interglacials, each
JB>> lasting about 12,000 years.
JB>> Most of the long-term climate data collected from various sources
JB>> also shows a strong correlation with the three astronomical
JB>> cycles which are together known as the Milankovich cycles. The
JB>> three Milankovich cycles include the tilt of the earth, which
JB>> varies over a 41,000 year period; the shape of the earths orbit,
JB>> which changes over a period of 100,000 years; and the Precession
JB>> of the Equinoxes, also known as the earths wobble, which
JB>> gradually rotates the direction of the earths axis over a period
JB>> of 26,000 years. According to the Milankovich theory of Ice Age
JB>> causation, these three astronomical cycles, each of which effects
JB>> the amount of solar radiation which reaches the earth, act
JB>> together to produce the cycle of cold Ice Age maximums and warm
JB>> interglacials.
JB>> Elements of the astronomical theory of Ice Age causation were
JB>> first presented by the French mathematician Joseph Adhemar in
JB>> 1842, it was developed further by the English prodigy Joseph
JB>> Croll in 1875, and the theory was established in its present form
JB>> by the Serbian mathematician Milutin Milankovich in the 1920s and
JB>> 30s. In 1976 the prestigious journal Science published a landmark
JB>> paper by John Imbrie, James Hays, and Nicholas Shackleton
JB>> entitled Variations in the Earth's orbit: Pacemaker of the Ice
JB>> Ages, which described the correlation which the trio of
JB>> scientist/authors had found between the climate data obtained
JB>> from ocean sediment cores and the patterns of the astronomical
JB>> Milankovich cycles. Since the late 1970s, the Milankovich theory
JB>> has remained the predominant theory to account for Ice Age
JB>> causation among climate scientists, and hence the Milankovich
JB>> theory is always described in textbooks of climatology and in
JB>> encyclopaedia articles about the Ice Ages.
JB>> In their 1976 paper Imbrie, Hays, and Shackleton wrote that their
JB>> own climate forecasts, which were based on sea-sediment cores and
JB>> the Milankovich cycles, " must be qualified in two ways. First,
JB>> they apply only to the natural component of future climatic
JB>> trends - and not to anthropogenic effects such as those due to
JB>> the burning of fossil fuels. Second, they describe only the
JB>> long-term trends, because they are linked to orbital variations
JB>> with periods of 20,000 years and longer. Climatic oscillations at
JB>> higher frequencies are not predicted... the results indicate that
JB>> the long-term trend over the next 20,000 years is towards
JB>> extensive Northern Hemisphere glaciation and cooler climate."
JB>> During the 1970s the famous American astronomer Carl Sagan and
JB>> other scientists began promoting the theory that greenhouse
JB>> gasses such as carbon dioxide, or CO2, produced by human
JB>> industries could lead to catastrophic global warming. Since the
JB>> 1970s the theory of anthropogenic global warming (AGW) has
JB>> gradually become accepted as fact by most of the academic
JB>> establishment, and their acceptance of AGW has inspired a global
JB>> movement to encourage governments to make pivotal changes to
JB>> prevent the worsening of AGW.
JB>> The central piece of evidence that is cited in support of the AGW
JB>> theory is the famous hockey stick graph which was presented by Al
JB>> Gore in his 2006 film An Inconvenient Truth. The hockey stick
JB>> graph shows an acute upward spike in global temperatures which
JB>> began during the 1970s and continued through the winter of
JB>> 2006/07. However, this warming trend was interrupted when the
JB>> winter of 2007/8 delivered the deepest snow cover to the Northern
JB>> Hemisphere since 1966 and the coldest temperatures since 2001. It
JB>> now appears that the current Northern Hemisphere winter of
JB>> 2008/09 will probably equal or surpass the winter of 2007/08 for
JB>> both snow depth and cold temperatures.
JB>> The main flaw in the AGW theory is that its proponents focus on
JB>> evidence from only the past one thousand years at most, while
JB>> ignoring the evidence from the past million years -- evidence
JB>> which is essential for a true understanding of climatology. The
JB>> data from paleoclimatology provides us with an alternative and
JB>> more credible explanation for the recent global temperature
JB>> spike, based on the natural cycle of Ice Age maximums and
JB>> interglacials.
JB>> In 1999 the British journal Nature published the results of data
JB>> derived from glacial ice cores collected at the Russia s Vostok
JB>> station in Antarctica during the 1990s. The Vostok ice core data
JB>> includes a record of global atmospheric temperatures, atmospheric
JB>> CO2 and other greenhouse gases, and airborne particulates
JB>> starting from 420,000 years ago and continuing through history up
JB>> to our present time.
JB>> The graph of the Vostok ice core data shows that the Ice Age
JB>> maximums and the warm interglacials occur within a regular cyclic
JB>> pattern, the graph-line of which is similar to the rhythm of a
JB>> heartbeat on an electrocardiogram tracing. The Vostok data graph
JB>> also shows that changes in global CO2 levels lag behind global
JB>> temperature changes by about eight hundred years. What that
JB>> indicates is that global temperatures precede or cause global CO2
JB>> changes, and not the reverse. In other words, increasing
JB>> atmospheric CO2 is not causing global temperature to rise;
JB>> instead the natural cyclic increase in global temperature is
JB>> causing global CO2 to rise.
JB>> The reason that global CO2 levels rise and fall in response to
JB>> the global temperature is because cold water is capable of
JB>> retaining more CO2 than warm water. That is why carbonated
JB>> beverages loose their carbonation, or CO2, when stored in a warm
JB>> environment. We store our carbonated soft drinks, wine, and beer
JB>> in a cool place to prevent them from loosing their fizz, which is
JB>> a feature of their carbonation, or CO2 content. The earth is
JB>> currently warming as a result of the natural Ice Age cycle, and
JB>> as the oceans get warmer, they release increasing amounts of CO2
JB>> into the atmosphere.
JB>> Because the release of CO2 by the warming oceans lags behind the
JB>> changes in the earths temperature, we should expect to see global
JB>> CO2 levels continue to rise for another eight hundred years after
JB>> the end of the earths current Interglacial warm period. We should
JB>> already be eight hundred years into the coming Ice Age before
JB>> global CO2 levels begin to drop in response to the increased
JB>> chilling of the worlds oceans.
JB>> The Vostok ice core data graph reveals that global CO2 levels
JB>> regularly rose and fell in a direct response to the natural cycle
JB>> of Ice Age minimums and maximums during the past four hundred and
JB>> twenty thousand years. Within that natural cycle, about every
JB>> 110,000 years global temperatures, followed by global CO2 levels,
JB>> have peaked at approximately the same levels which they are at
JB>> today.
JB>> About 325,000 years ago, at the peak of a warm interglacial,
JB>> global temperature and CO2 levels were higher than they are
JB>> today. Today we are again at the peak, and near to the end, of a
JB>> warm interglacial, and the earth is now due to enter the next Ice
JB>> Age. If we are lucky, we may have a few years to prepare for it.
JB>> The Ice Age will return, as it always has, in its regular and
JB>> natural cycle, with or without any influence from the effects of
JB>> AGW.
JB>> The AGW theory is based on data that is drawn from a ridiculously
JB>> narrow span of time and it demonstrates a wanton disregard for
JB>> the big picture of long-term climate change. The data from
JB>> paleoclimatology, including ice cores, sea sediments, geology,
JB>> paleobotany and zoology, indicate that we are on the verge of
JB>> entering another Ice Age, and the data also shows that severe and
JB>> lasting climate change can occur within only a few years. While
JB>> concern over the dubious threat of Anthropogenic Global Warming
JB>> continues to distract the attention of people throughout the
JB>> world, the very real threat of the approaching and inevitable Ice
JB>> Age, which will render large parts of the Northern Hemisphere
JB>> uninhabitable, is being foolishly ignored.
JB>> Gregory F. Fegel
JB>> --- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10 * Origin: (1:226/600)
RW> R\%/itt
Champion QUOTING!!
Best Regards,
Herman Neut
e-mail: h.neutnospam@hccnet.nl
--- Terminate 5.00/Pro & BinkD/0.9.7-stable/Powered by WinXP
* Origin: Ster in Twente -Haaksbergen-The Netherlands (2:280/1141)
|