Text 17565, 80 rader
Skriven 2011-04-28 14:58:52 av Roy Witt (1:387/22)
  Kommentar till text 17521 av Michiel van der Vlist (2:280/5555)
Ärende: Names will never hurt me...
===================================
28 Apr 11 12:48, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Roy Witt:

 MvdV>>> The name is the same, but that is all. Is any future person who
 MvdV>>> happens to carry the name "Roy Witt" bound by any contract you
 MvdV>>> sign?

 RW>> They might. i.e. I've signed an agreement with the taxing body in
 RW>> this county to defer all of my property taxes until one of the
 RW>> surviving property owners vacate this place or die, whichever comes
 RW>> first. To retain the property, my heirs have to honor that agreement
 RW>> and pay the back taxes. If not, C'est la vie...

 MvdV> They have the option to decline have they?

Yeup. I suspect that if we live long enough, the property won't be worth
what the back taxes plus interest would be. But who knows what our heirs
will do until they have to face that decision.

 MvdV>>> Perpetual leases are illegal and therefore null and void in
 MvdV>>> most civil countries

 RW>> Not...a lease between two parties can be anything the parties wish
 RW>> it to be. Obviously that is the case here.

 MvdV> So a contract to kill someone is legal in the US?

Non Sequitur: such a contract wouldn't be a perpetual agreement.

 RW>>>> Your opinion is; irrelevant.

 MvdV>>> But I will give it anyway, so that you know what you are up to
 MvdV>>> when you ever want to sign a contract with us.

 RW>> The only thing I'd sign would be an order to invade your country to
 RW>> rescue any and all Americans there from being prosecuted in your
 RW>> world court. If any Dutchman gets in the way, oh fucking well.

 MvdV> If you were to say those words in public on Dutch soil, you would
 MvdV> risk to stand trial for issuing a death threat. We do not take
 MvdV> those things lightly.

Where do you see a death threat in the above?

 MvdV>>> I really wonder why the then Cuban Government agreed to let
 MvdV>>> itself be shackled by such restrictive terms. Perhaps the guns
 MvdV>>> pointed at them clouded their senses...

 RW>> Perhaps they were just utterly greatful to the American government
 RW>> for rescuing them during their third attempt to free themselves from
 RW>> their Europeon enslaver and aggressor state. That happened a lot in
 RW>> the last century before we helped them.

 MvdV> Yeah sure. That is why they threw out the US puppet government and
 MvdV> replaced it by the Castro regime...

There were no US puppets in the Cuban government. Cosa Nostra, Italian
Mafia, perhaps. But no US puppets.

 MvdV>>>>> The bottom line is that the Cubans can not get rid of the US
 MvdV>>>>> base in Guantanomo because the US refuses to go.

 RW>>>> And continues to pay the Republic of Cuba the rent.

 MvdV>>> And how much do the Cubans receive?

 RW>> Dunno.

 MvdV> Liar. You know very well they get nothing, as they refuse the
 MvdV> $4000+ peanuts.

If you knew the answer, why did you ask such a stupid question? What one
does with money paid per contract, in good faith, is none of the US's
business.

                R\%/itt

  Fox News was not used as a source for information in this message!

--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000-10
 * Origin: SATX Alamo Area Net * South * Texas, USA * (1:387/22)