Text 10061, 81 rader
Skriven 2013-08-27 16:18:42 av mark lewis (1:3634/12.0)
  Kommentar till text 10054 av Björn Felten (2:203/2)
Ärende: Internet access
=======================
 On Tue, 27 Aug 2013, Björn Felten wrote to Michiel van der Vlist:

 ml>> BJ's was another...

 BF>    All of a sudden he manages to get his upper case letters
 BF> properly, waddayaknow...

you choose now to pick a fight about little bullshit as that?

 BF>    I suspect that he's referring to me there, but unlike Dale he's
 BF> not technically competent to get my "ö" right, so he goes into
 BF> this. 

no, i know how to make your ö... indeed, i've done it many times... you are
obviously confusing me with someone else yet again :/

 BF>    And yes, for quite some time I had his JamNNTPd server on my
 BF> mailer, after all I am somewhat of a caretaker for all the JamNNTPd
 BF> servers in Fidonet, which means I probably accessed his server once
 BF> every 15 minutes or so. Until I was kicked out by him, that is.

no... i've never kicked anyone off my news server... what i did do was to
change the group that Z1C was in so that it was no longer accessible for
reading by anonymous users...

speaking of anonymous users, i still haven't gotten an application from you for
access to my news server... i'm not just going to give it to you... you have to
ask just like everyone else using the same procedures as everyone else...

 BF>    And no, there's no way in hell he can see from the logs what
 BF> echoes I read. He just assumed that I did read the Z1C echo -- this
 BF> so very sacred echo -- via *his* server.

you may not be able to but i sure can... especially during mail tossing when
jamnntpd tries to access an area that is locked by the tosser... then there's
my deep packet inspection tools which alert me to all kinds of data gleaned
from within the network packets... i can easily tell what message headers and
bodies are being retrieved from what areas... then again, i could also just
look at the logs created by jamnntpd if i apply my logging mod to it ;)

 BF>    Yes, I had -- and still have -- access to it, but not via his
 BF> badly maintained server.

badly maintained in what way? there is nothing wrong with my server,
thankyouverymuch... have you tried accessing it like i asked you to do some
time back when i realized that my QOS was knocking all unspecified traffic to
"slow"? i never got any feedback from you about that after i specifically added
news to my QOS settings and raised it to "high" like my other main protocols...

or are you bitching about something else?

 ml>> is the "war" still in operation?? :(

 MvdV> A major issue of contention - the annexation of Fidonews - is still
 MvdV> ongoing. And now we have another issue: A Belgian node listed
 MvdV> in Z1. So what do you expect? That we just roll over and submit?

 BF>    Of course they expect us to just roll over and submit.

no.. i, for one, expect you to do your god damned job and act like a proper
moderator instead of denigrating, berating and putting down the US and others
when you take a fit... there's a lot of crap that has gone on in here that you
should have put a stop to years ago... but you didn't do that... privately or
publically...

 BF> After all, they are still the bullies of the world. Military,
 BF> commercially, technically and every other -y you can think of. But
 BF> like the Romans, they are going down. 

non-sequiter bullshit argument...

 BF>    And it's not because they worship the wrong god. Well, maybe, if
 BF> you count the military-industrial-complex as a god -- a god that
 BF> already Ike warned them about...

and what does any so-called "god" have to do with it?? yet another bullshit
argument...

)\/(ark

 * Origin:  (1:3634/12)