Text 15028, 116 rader
Skriven 2014-05-08 18:03:40 av Roy Witt (1:387/22)
  Kommentar till text 14995 av Joe Delahaye (41494.fidonews)
Ärende: Right up your, errrr,
=============================
Greetings Joe!

 RW>> Oh, you referred to Fox as a fake news agency. Odd that it is the
 RW>> most watched news source, isn't it. There must be something to that
 RW>> fake shit that everybody prefers over the likes of the lib-lies
 RW>> perpetrated by news channels, such as MSNBC, CBS, CNN, NBC, ABC,
 RW>> etc..

 JD> Yes I did.  News controlled and severely biased to the right,
 JD> controlled by Murdoch and company

Funny that! Murdock and company are Australians.

 JD>>> they are too damn biased in their opinions.

 RW>> ROTFLMAO! Fox News doesn't report opinion, they report the news as
 RW>> it happens(ed) and you decide how you'll take it in your own stride.

 JD> Of course it does.  I have never seen a pure news show on either Fox
 JD> or CNN or even on the three Canadian news channels.

You obviously get out of bed on the wrong side. I wake up to Fox News
(offered without opinion) and when the special shows come on, hosted by
such outspoken people as Bill O'Reilly, he also has includes some liberals
on his show to tell the other side of a story. You've obviously been
missing some good shows.

 JD>  It is running commentary 24/7 unless there is a live event in which
 JD> case that is covered 24/7

That's not true, which proves that you've never watched Fox News.

 RW>> What you've been watching isn't news, it's one person's show
 RW>> (O'Reilly, Hannity, etc.) and their opinion (although what they have
 RW>> to say is right on the money. Fox just gives them an orange crate to
 RW>> speak from. The one I like best among those people is Greta Van
 RW>> something. She brings in people who're well equipped to comment on
 RW>> the subjects she has in her 'investigations' of the most notorious
 RW>> fanatics on the left.

 JD> Both of those two you mention up above, have been shown the error of
 JD> their ways,

LOL! I've never seen that nor would it be my opinion.

 JD>  by their guests more then once.

LOL! Obama finally showed up for an interview, was given every courtesy
afforded to his place in the WH, but not allowee to bloviate away from the
facts.

 JD> I hate commentators and interviewers, (the bearded wonder on CNN
 JD> included),

He's a sick, pos...

 JD> who ask a question and then almost immediately interrupt with either
 JD> another question, or in the case of those two above to call the
 JD> person they are interviewing a liar.

If you  show up and tell lies, what is the problem with that? If you're a
liar, then you certainly should be called on the carpet for it.

 JD>>> as well as that program on CNN where they pit an idea against a
 JD>>> panel of opposite politcal views.  Most of the time that is quiet
 JD>>> from what have seen of it but they do get carried away.

 RW>> Not only that, but they can't stop reporting on it until something
 RW>> new comes along. Talk about Boring!

 JD> I think you have the wrong show here.  I cant think of the show, but
 JD> it was gone for several years from CNN and just came back this or
 JD> last year.  It features people from both political parties, on a
 JD> panel, with two hosts, also from opposite sides.

That's how every news channel does it. Sunday Morning Fox News with Chris
Wallace has an even amount of left and right guests. Each one gets to
openly speak their mind. They also interview various Senate and House
members for their input. I dunno, I think very highly of George Will and
Brit Hume, but can't stand that black sob who got fired from Public Radio
for his outrageous lies and well he should have. Public Radio is a
liberally biased entity?! and he is too.

 RW>> I did notice something good about CNN, they have less commercials
 RW>> than Fox ... I guess if you don't have an audience, there's no sense
 RW>> in advertising anything on it. I would hope that Fox would take
 RW>> notice of that and do the same, but I guess when you're the top dog,
 RW>> you do what you have to do. That alone probably pays each and every
 RW>> one of those very beautiful blondes well enough to keep them coming.
 RW>> I've never seen an ugly bitch like Rachael Maddow on Fox either.

 JD> I find an excessive amount of advertising on all networks, CNN
 JD> included. As for top dog, who told you that fox was in that position?

Public information offered by poll takers. Some of whom I trust to poll
with no bias whatsoever.

 JD> As I mentioned elsewhere, polls can be made to give any result you
 JD> wish to have, especially if you pay for it.

Yeah, yeah. I've heard that garbage before.

 RW>> That's because there are different views on every subject, no matter
 RW>> what the subject is. At least most of us can agree that libs are the
 RW>> executioners in anything political, attacking the conservatives
 RW>> until they draw blood. I'm really surprised that conservatives have
 RW>> been so docile in the face of that shit. But, they're of a different
 RW>> breed than the mongrel dogs on the left.

    Have a day!

         R\%/itt - K5RXT

--- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-31012
--- D'Bridge 3.99
 * Origin: Felten's Lunch Counter, Today's Special; Shit Stuffing! (1:387/22)