Text 16404, 221 rader
Skriven 2014-06-24 17:41:00 av Bill McGarrity (8701.2fidonews)
Kommentar till text 16389 av Roy Witt (1:387/22)
Ärende: Re: (BIG YAWN!)
=======================
-=> Roy Witt wrote to Bill McGarrity <=-
RW> @MSGID: <53A9C354.8686.2fidonews@tequilamockingbirdonline.net>
RW> Greetings Bill!
BM>>> And does it not say Love thy neighbor?
RW>>> It does, but it doesn't mean in a homosexual way. It merely means
RW>>> that you should "love your neighbor as you would love yourself: But
RW>>> now you also put off all these; anger, wrath, malice, blasphemy"
RW>>> etc..
RW>>> You havn't, so I'm guessing by your actions that you're still
RW>>> sodomizing your brothers.
BM>> Oh, you're a theologian now defining what loving thy neighbot is?
RW>> I'm far from it, although I'll admit to having studied the bible
RW>> many
BM> About the only true statement you've made in a long time.
RW> Everything I've ever said is true. You justhave a problem in English
RW> comprehension that surpasses Joe Delaheye's comprehension.
In your eyes... to the rest of us it's simple hogwash...
RW>> years ago and still quite able to read it in review. It provides a
RW>> lot of entertainment when morons who 'quote from it' do so out of
RW>> context; which is what you've been doing all along.
BM> Where did I quote anything out of context. I quoted a passage from
BM> the exact same book of Leviticus you did.
RW> When you take a complete paragraph and break out a one-liner from it,
RW> you have taken words out of context.
RW> i.e. Leviticus 18:17-"You shall not hate your fellow countryman in your
RW> heart; you may surely reprove your neighbor, but shall not incur sin
RW> because of him. 18-You shall not take vengeance, nor bear any grudge
RW> against the sons of your people, but you shall love your neighbor as
RW> yourself; I am the LORD."
BM> Now the question is, why shouldn't I say your taking things out of
BM> context?
Again, did I say I was incuring sin with any individual? You're the one who
has this sense of me being gay due to the fact that I let them practice their
inalienable rights as citizens of the United States which are guaranteed by the
Constitution. You have the issues, not I. I don't have issue with your
disapproval but you've taken it well beyond that. That is known as vengence and
bearing a grudge, and according to your quoting above, you and Tim are guilty
of.
RW> Because you can't.
BM> BTW, morons is not a personal attack? You're a very strange man.
RW> Do you consider moron in the plural to encompass just you...
You've publicly stated that. You have a habit of calling anyone who doesn't
follow your warped sense of humanity or any other view you hold to be a moron.
It's all part of the disorder you're suffing from Roy. One day you'll get a
grip on it.
BM>> You wear many hats Roy..
RW>> It's a bitch having so many hats, but somebody has to wear them in
RW>> the face of those who misquote from the bible.
Where did I misquote? Your comprehension of what I said is blinded by your
bigoted hatred. Smell the coffee Roy.
BM> Again, show me where I misquoted that passage from Leviticus?
RW> See above...
Not a misquote, a misunderstanding and comprehension on your part.
BM>>> Oh wait, that's your selective comprehension again...
RW>>> Actually, you're the one being selective. "Love they neighbor"
RW>>> doesn't mean you should fuck them in the ass or such his dick.
BM>> Never said that.
RW>> You didn't have to, it was very well defined by your depicting a
RW>> bible scholar stating out of context that which does not apply to
RW>> 'love the sodomites' that you wanted it to mean.
BM> Again, your reasoning is guided by your inherent blindness when it
BM> comes to another human being.
RW> You forgot to include 'ignorant' between another and human...
If my intention was describing you, then I would have.
BM> No one has ordained you as judge and jury when it comes to the Bible
BM> just as no one has ordained me.
RW> Actually, I was, but that's water over the bridge here.
BM> I'll let God do the judging when their time comes.
RW> If there is such a being; I'm sure you won't have anything to say about
RW> it that would make a hill of beans. I said I've studied the bible, not
RW> that I believe any of it.
Your loss....
BM> How about you worry about you own issues and leave the lives and
BM> choices of others to them.
RW> If they'd leave me alone, I don't have a problem with that. However,
RW> when it comes down to you attacking me or anyone else, that's my que to
RW> engage.
And just who did the attacking when it came to people expressing their rights
as Americans when dealing with sexuality? Where does it state that gays don't
have rights... that they're second class citizens as you say they are. It
doesn't. Your case is moot.
BM>> My statements were based where I wasn't a homophobe over their
BM>> actions.
RW>> LOL! You're dismissed.
BM>>> The rest of your drival is rehashed BS....
RW>>> ^^^^^^
RW>>> When you're caught up in your own misinterpreted drivel (note
RW>>> proper spelling) that doesn't mean Tim is wrong, just that you're
RW>>> not paying attention.
BM>> Hey... spelling nazi.... is that all you got?
RW>> Did I call it a misspelling? No. I merely used your tact to point
RW>> out the obvious. Which means that your label of spelling Nazi (note
RW>> cap on the noun) is rediculouse.
BM> Didn't have to, it was implied by your statement "(note proper
BM> spelling)".
RW> Oh, but there is a difference. You're just not able to see it yet.
Please, you flatter yourself with praise only a self-centered bigot would.
BM> BTW, there's no "e" in the word rediculous. May want to make note of
BM> that if your trying to make a point of correcting someone else's
BM> spelling mistake.
RW> Misspelings are sometimes deliberately done so to make people laugh or
RW> get their attention. And in doing so, I succeeded in getting your
So I guess my spelling of "wittless" falls into the same catagory.
RW> attention to every detail. That increases your reading English
RW> comprehension. From now on, you'll be more careful in your spelling of
RW> words that seem to go over your head; as in wittless.
LOL... what a load of crap. The sad part about it is you believe this
bullshit. You are indeed a sick person. Remember Roy, Narcisstic Personality
Disorder... you're a classic case.
BM>> You do make me laugh..
RW>> It's good that you can laugh at yourself.
BM> No Roy, you are still the laughing stock of this echo along with your
BM> buddy.
RW> If you havn't noticed by now, no one is laughing as hard as Tim and my
RW> self at your flailing of arms in defense of your personal attacks on
RW> us.
You're the only two who are publicly stating it. Behind the scenes Roy... you
have NO idea. Even George Carlin would kill for this material you're spewing if
he was still alive.
BM> You're consistantly screaming at the top of your lungs about
BM> something you have no control over and that is ripping you apart.
RW> If you were a psychiatrist, you'd be an utter failure.
You should actually be seeing one...
BM> There called inalienable rights for a reason Roy...
RW> They're...
Got me... here's a gold star.
BM> and they're off limits to the likes of you and your bigoted, racist,
BM> idiot, wannabes followers.
RW> c
RW> You may say so until you're blue in the face, but you haven't convinced
RW> me yet.
And I never will. You're a hopeless human being and thus the reasoning for my
last post regarding the issue.
BM> Have whatever you want... you're paying for it.
RW> Oh, ok. Today is lunch on you...
Where did you get I was paying for it? You do have trouble with words.
Bill
Telnet: bbs.tequilamockingbirdonline.net
Web: bbs.tequilamockingbirdonline.net
IRC: irc.tequilamockingbirdonline.net Ports: 6661-6670 SSL: +6697
Radio: radio.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:8010/live
... Motorcycles are everywhere... Look Twice, Save a Life!
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.50
--- SBBSecho 2.27-Win32
* Origin: TequilaMockingbird Online - Toms River, NJ (1:266/404)
|