Text 16959, 229 rader
Skriven 2014-07-24 00:56:00 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av BILL MCGARRITY
Ärende: BILL'S BAG of NONSENSE
==============================
On 07-22-14, BILL MCGARRITY said to TIM RICHARDSON:

BM>Re: BILL'S BAG of LAUGH'S
BM>By: TIM RICHARDSON to BILL MCGARRITY on Tue Jul 22 2014 13:24:00

TR> Ball isn't a fraud, Box isn't any closer to the truth on `global warming'
TR> than you are.


BM>Oh and Ball is? LOL... 94% of his peers call him a fraud


The `94%' of whom you speak are no doubt the very ones who reacted
to the exposure Ball subjected them to over their fraudulent use
of so-called `global warming' to make well-paid careers, including
retirement and benefit packages.


If someone was one of those who fell in that category, they would
certainly come out and join any and every effort to smear Ball.


The whole gamut of `discreditation' would come into play.


Raise questions about his degrees.


Claim triumphantly `there was no climatology department where Ball
was a professor', and ignore that `geology' is really tied up with
historic weather information.


BM>but you, man of the world knows best.


And you....climate expert that you are, aren't just comical, you're
ridiculous!


You spout the first thing you hear as `fact', and disparage any
information or people who don't nod and shake their heads at
every profound word you say.


Your problem is you don't bother to look at things in a more
critical way. `Global Warming' programs get installed in a
bunch of universities, `study' funds get poured into them
(more and more each year), we-re inundated with a bunch of
`gloom and doom' reports....most of which tell us (guess what?)
more research...more study is needed (surprised?), and the
nonsense is fed to the public (make that read `taxpayers') on
a regular basis.


While it was beginning to get suspicious anyway, study upon study,
over thirty or more years, which would equal a lot of people have
since reached retirement age, and a whole new crew in place. Along
with the vast amount of money the taxpayers have been forced to
pour into it. And the years and years of taxpayers being told its
all THEIR fault!


Then....the shit hit the fan! The East Anglia university `study'
group got caught playing tricks with the data! And then some of
the more recent and past data started getting looked at more
closely....and it turns out we've been getting scammed!


And useful idiots like you still have the blinders on.


BMYou're quite the comedian Tim.  You should audition
BM>for Last Comic Standing.... I'd pay to see you get the "hook".


Your oft-expressed desire to see others humiliated, used violently,
and your continuing denial of other's right to an opinion of their
own, reminds me of another useful idiot whose name is verboten here,
but had the same characteristics as you.


TR> There's nothing to `answer'.


BM>I could have predicted that because you don't have an answer.


Ah but I do. Its just a lot of typing and research through the extensive
material I have archived.


BM>You're savior Ball is a joke and you, as usual, blindly follow his teaching
BM>as gospel even though the only thing of so-called value he's published was
BM>his thesis (which read like a book report on facts gathered by housewives
BM>so they would know how to dress the kids to go to school).


Which is a whole lot more that YOU have `published' on the subject. And taking
your entire amount of `knowledge' in the field, *you* wouldn't qualify to
be a pimple on Ball's ass.


BM>Do a little research on the Petermann glacier and tell me who predicted
BM>that one. Granted, he was off by two years but it was shedding icebergs
BM>twice the size of Manhattan. More research for you Tim... look up Dark Ice
BM>and how it's caused.


BM>I know this will not change your mind, which is fine, my actual goal is to
BM>make a bigger fool than you


Make a bigger fool than I? Don't worry....you already are!


But...just to show my heart is in the right place (so to speak),
let me give you some information that might bring it into more
focus (although I know you'll disparage it immediately).


The IPCC is a tight-knit politically-oriented group, that have cost
the world billions and billions of dollars. And so-called `scientific'
groups like the CRU (climate research unit) at East Anglia have
caused set-backs to ordinary peoples' trust and confidence in `science'
as it pertains to the Earth's climate, that may never be erased.


The main idea is to slow progress to a crawl. What better way to do
that than shutting off, or at least slowing to a trickle, the
main source of modern-day energy? Fossil Fuels. Why? Because a bunch
of idiot do-gooders, who think they know what's best for everybody
else, are convinced they can `cure' us all of our need for fossil
fuels. They think to `jump start' us into moving to the next level
of humanity's evolution toward sources and types of `energy', by
slowly denying us what we now have; fossil fuel.


But we don't have anything better than fossil fuel right now.


And you and I will probably both be dead and gone before there is
a source of energy that runs my car without having to plug it in
overnight, pay huge electric bills, get 60mph out of it and
less than 300 miles of range.


Windmills aren't cutting it. Aside from the deaths of much of the
aviary life in windmill `farms'...right now it would take so
many windmills to power (lets just take) California, it would
wipe out large swaths of natural habitat (pissing the Sierra
Club no end), disrupt or outright kill large amounts of wildlife,
and just look ugly no end!


Besides....it turns out that windmill power ain't the handy dandy
pie in the sky it was touted to be. They don't last long before
they're locking up due to heat friction. Some of them even catch
fire....whoa!!!! Prairie fires!


And solar panels are said to interfere with aviation, not to
mention the panels having to be swapped out regularly, and
there couldn't be enough of them to `power' California.


And we haven't even gotten into the `maintainence'. Manpower
to constantly stay on top of such a `grid', windmill OR
solar panel! The cost in wages alone is prohibitive, and
with Hussein's new `healthcare'....well...


By the way....remember that guy Mann? Of the `hockey stick'
fame?


He took Ball to court and tried to sue him. But...it went
nowhere! Why? Because when it came time to present `evidence',
Mann wouldn't show any of his data....or calculations...or
any of his `settled science' in court!


Question: If the science is so `settled'....why wouldn't Mann
want it to be shown as `settled' in open court?


The biggest reason there's such a vast amount of hatred and
disparagement aimed at Ball is because he's exposed the so-
called `global warming' issue for what it is; a massive fraud,
perpetrated by know-nothing do-gooders willing to expend large
amounts of other people's money (taxpayers), in order to make
well-paying careers, and garner large amounts of `research'
and `study' funds.


In fact...the Earth's climate is cyclical over many thousands
of years. And what we experience today is NOT caused by anything
Man is doing. Both the Sun and the planet Jupiter have large
effects on the Earth's orbital ecentricities, which effects our
weather.


Mankind has been industrialized and `scientific' for such a short
period of Human History, that it can almost be completely ignored
where `keeping records' of weather and global climate are concerned.


The weather and global climate have been ever changing since before
the Earth was starting to see hominids appear.


We may even see the very beginnings of the next Ice Age in our
lifetimes. Nobody knows. And certainly not the IPCC. Or Hussein
either.





And there are






---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 bbs.docsnetservices.com (1:123/140)