Text 20489, 87 rader
Skriven 2015-01-07 19:00:00 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av BJÖRN FELTEN
Ärende: 3 x Bush
================
On 12-21-14, BJöRN FELTEN said to TIM RICHARDSON:

TR> Thats blind dedication!


BF>I guess you meant "that's"? Thats sounds like a Korean name of sort... 8-)


BF>Anyway -- the blind dedication is exactly what you and the other global
BF>warming deniers are guilty of in case you didn't perceive it yet.


Well....if we're all (we `deny-ers') so `blind'...then that has to mean the
advocates of the `global warming' scam don't have to worry about us..because
`they're' so right....and `we're' so wrong.


Then....why do they hate us so? What is it about what we're saying they don't
want people to hear? To the point where they want to jail people lke me for
speaking out against it.


Did you know that James Hansen of NASA called for people who dare to be
skeptics of the `global warming' claims to be `tried for high crimes against
humanity.'


Or here's that great climate scientist, Robert F. Kennedy Jr, in 2007 on
people like me who object to being railroaded into believing in `global
warming'; "This is treason. And we ought to start treating them like
traitors." He also called coal companies "criminal enterprises" ...and
their CEO's `should be in jail. For all eternity.'


Real smart. But...if its all so real and `the science is so settled'...
why all the hate and venom? Because that doesn't fit in with a subject
thats supposed to be so `settled'. If its really `settled'...the
proponents would be able to stand on their `facts' and be unassailable.


Here's some more hate from the `global warming crowd....


In 2009, a former Clinton official; Joe Romm made the comment; "An entire
generation will soon be ready to strangle you and your kind while you
sleep in your beds." He was talking about skeptics like me.


A Canadian by the name of David Suzuki called for government leaders who
were skeptical of golbal warming to be thrown in jail back in 2008.


Did you know the term `climate blasphemy' has come into vogue?


In a report to the U.S. Senate in 2007 details of skeptical scientists
being threatened and intimidated for their opposition to the `global
warming' notions were revealed.


Many scientists lost their positions over their skepticism.


And once, the U.N. special climate envoy, a Dr. Gro Harlem Bruntland, declared
that "its completely immoral, even, to question the UN's "scientific
concensus."


`Immoral'?


Back in 2007 a meteorologist called for broadcast meteorologists who expressed
any doubt whatsoever of `global warming' or its `catestrophic effects' to lose
their scientific certification.


If its so `real' and `the science is settled'....then why the fierce attempts
to suppress any and all publicly-voiced opposition? If it were indeed
`settled'...it would stand any and all criticism and stand on its own.


So...why delete e-mails? Why alter data? If they aren't covering up
anything...why the coverup?

---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Check Out Doc's QWK Mail  Via Web BBS > DocsPlace.org  (1:123/140)