Text 20490, 127 rader
Skriven 2015-01-07 20:52:00 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av JOE DELAHAYE
Ärende: The crack-pot century
=============================
On 01-05-15, JOE DELAHAYE said to TIM RICHARDSON:

JD>Re: The crack-pot century
JD>By: TIM RICHARDSON to BJ+RN FELTEN on Mon Jan 05 2015 09:11:00


TR> Your `version' of the century is faulty. There are facts and testimony
TR>out there that show you are looking at the `global warming' scam with
TR>blinders on. Open your eyes and take in the reality.


JD>According to the rest of us who do care about the planet, your version is
JD>faulty.  Open YOUR eyes and forget about those industrialists and
JD>conservatives who deny what is a fact.


Well...actually, your `facts' are a little faulty. Ans some are even made up,
Fabricated out of whole cloth.


The claim of `concensus' in the scam is hogwash. There is no `concensus'. Its
a deliberate lie based on phoney notions, which are never really defined.


A `concensus' on what? Computer models that don't fit facts and have to be
altered to show data that isn't real?


Proof that parts of the Earth have warmed isn't the same as proof that there
is `global warming'.


And `concensus'? There isn't any. Both the two key outfits that make such a
claim; the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) and the Americn Meteorilogical
Society (AMS) never allowed member scientists in either outfit to vote on such
statements.


So much for `concensus'.


Actually...about 2 dozen or so members of the governing boards of those
outfits supplied the `concensus' that was claimed.


And during the IPCC summary conference for policy makers of 2007, in which it
was claimed  they were the `voices of hundreds, even thousands' of climate
scientists? Exactly 52 scientists were present. And never showed a scintilla
of proof of being the `voice' of anyone! So much for `concensus'.


And many of these scientists who were the refered-to `voices of hundreds, even
thousands' this group of 52 claimed to be the `voices' of? They had to resort
to lawsuits to get their names removed from the list of names these 52 elite
committee members claimed in their `concensus', becausse they had never been
so much as asked if they wanted to be part of it. Sounds to me like `concensus
by fraud'.


A study found that very few scientists were really involved in the UN's peer
review process. In fact, a study by John McLean, a UN climate data analyst,
revealed that the `peer review' process is a joke! Meaningless.


A new study found that very few actual scientists are involved in the peer
review process. to the point where its fantasy!


In fact, there is very little real scientific support for some of the main
points the UN references to support some of their wid claims.


Alabama State University climatologist, Dr John Christy, told of once
sitting at a table with three European climatologists who were trying to
make a report they were about to submit to the UN sound so dramitic, it
would cause the United States to sign the Kyoto Protocol!


And the same individuals who were doing the primary research on the role
of humans on the climate...were the ones leading the UN's IPCC Assessment!


No conflict there...right?


Someone expressed the belief that the IPCC process was so flawed, so closed to
reaason, it should be `thanked for its work, shut down, and its work
transfered to some reputable university with no ties to either the IPCC OR
government.'


Of course, you're a Canadian so you have little interest in what the U.S.
spends on this scam...but it costs the taxpayers in this country around 5
billion dollars a year for research related to this `global warming' stuff.


As an example of how far this silliness has gone....in 2007 the US Department
of Agriculture gave some climate scam outfit $20 million to study the effects
of (get ready, folks)...*farm odors*! on climate change! $20 million taxpayer
dollars to study cow farts! Thats how ridiculous this whole thing has become.


Its about money. Lots of it. And it gets kept rolling in order to keep the
flow of an easy source of money coming in; from the taxpayers to the scam
artists. Both academics with their hands out, politicians with their hands
out, `green energy' companies that set up...give themselves all big raises,
bonuses, and then put the company in chapter 11 bankruptcy. Its a little
twist on an old tried and true con game; tell a convincing story...attract
investors (in this case the `investors' have little say in where their money
goes, they are sheep ready to be sheared. The politicians who `invest' our
money `for' us, are doing the `shearing', and the beneficiaries of our
largess, the con artists, get the money, split with the politicians through
campaign donations, and nobody's the wiser.


Any and all opposition gets smothered by the mainstream press and the
`experts'.


Its a scam. A huge con game. And it will probably be years before people
admit it and put a stop to it. In the mean time...our money goes out the
window!


---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Check Out Doc's QWK Mail  Via Web BBS > DocsPlace.org  (1:123/140)