Text 20519, 84 rader
Skriven 2015-01-09 10:54:00 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av JOE DELAHAYE
Ärende: The crack-pot century
=============================
On 01-08-15, JOE DELAHAYE said to TIM RICHARDSON:

JD>Re: The crack-pot century
JD>By: TIM RICHARDSON to BJ+RN FELTEN on Thu Jan 08 2015 13:55:00

TR> I like the way you leftist's try to shut a discussion down. Yeah....its
TR> *our* money! If they had spent even `half' the amount of money on solving
TR> the homeless problem in this country that they've poured into failed
TR> `green energy' companies, we wouldn't have to see raggedly-dressed people
TR> standing at freeway entrances begging for money. Or overwhelming our
TR> public parks so badly the citizenry are hesitant to take the family there
TR> for a picnic and a sports game.


JD>That's a bunch of malarky and you know it.


No....it isn't.


The economy both of the state of California AND the federal government became
such that many people who had once been doing quite well were suddenly living
from pay check to pay check.


Hussein's economic record is dismal. Millions are not only unemployed, but
have left the work force altogether because there aren't any jobs. And pretty
much every move Hussein and his coterie make, takes more jobs away from
Americans and makes them available to foreigners.


JD>Many, if not most of the homeless like it that way.


No...they don't.


JD>They dont want a house to live in where they have to pay rent, buy
JD>groceries, etc etc.


Yeah they do. You have a rather skewed way of looking at the homeless problem.


JD>If anyone treats the poor the
JD>wrong way, its the GOP and their weird policies of taxing the poor, and
JD>letting the rich off scott free, or as close to that as possible.  The
JD>excuse that it creates jobs, is just that, an excuse and a scam.


Yeah yeah yeah....its all that `George W. Bush's fault`! Same old same old!


Blame it all on `those republcans'.


Well....Hussein had both houses of Congresss in his pocket for the first half
of his first term. Why (oh! why?) didn't the `democrats' fix all that? Why did
it only get worse and worse? The democrats held power in the Congress...they
had a democrat in the White House. It got so bad that, in the first mid-term
election they faced, they took a blood-bath and lost the House. Due to a
Senate that remained in the hands of the democrats, a president who thinks he'
a monarch, and an inept Speaker in the house, they took another blood bath
that cost them the Senate this time.


Where's all the jobs the `democrats' should have created when they had the
power? Where's all the `tax cuts' they cound have made when they had the
power? Why aren't things all sweetness and light from the democrats making
wonderful changes like;
....abolishing taxes on the poor? ...making the rich pay all the taxes
instead?...all the `jobs' their moves would have created?


While they had the power (the Senate...the House...AND the White House...) why
didn't their policies make it all sweetness and light?





---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Check Out Doc's QWK Mail  Via Web BBS > DocsPlace.org  (1:123/140)