Text 20518, 98 rader
Skriven 2015-01-09 11:03:00 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av BJÖRN FELTEN
Ärende: The crack-pot century
=============================
On 01-09-15, BJöRN FELTEN said to TIM RICHARDSON:


BF>> *Our* money? How much do *you* pay?


TR> Collectively, Americans pay billions.


BF>So you don't pay anything,


Your little stunt of ignoring the fact that *I* and all Americans collectively
do indeed *pay*...through our taxes...and pretending I said something I
*didn't* say, actually amounts to a denial of the truth. Not a new thing with
you.


BF>and yet you think you have the right to decide where the money that
BF>*others* pay should go? Nice...


It is *our* money, and we each have a voice in what its used for. But you are
fully aware of how America works, so this trivial little diversion of yours
only makes you look silly.


BF>If you're so concerned about other people's money, why don't you
BF>experiment with the idea that USA cut their military expenditure by 50%,
BF>and see how many homeless people could be helped?


I am for America abolishing the EPA, that obstructionist outfit that throws
stumbling blocks in the way of every job-creating opportunity that arises in
America.


And I am for America telling this two-bit UN to pack up and take their silly,
meddling notions of how everybody is doomed unless countries pour billions of
taxpayer money down the shithole of `global warming'...and get the hell out of
our country.


You made a foolish try to shut me up by implying *I* don't pay anything so *I*
shouldn't say *anything* about where all American taxpayer's money goes in
this global warming scam.


But....you have only succeeded in revealing that you can't answer the simple,
sensible questions I've posed about the subject matter: global warming under
its various names. To wit:


If `global warming' is so real....why all the deception? Why try to hide e-
mail traffic on the subject?


If its so real....why threaten scientists who disagree with much of the
`findings' that support the notion with career-ending suppression?


If its all so valid...it would be unassailable. It would stand on its own, and
there'd be no need to threaten scientific publications with dire consequences
if they publish papers contrary to the `global warming' notion. But why does
that happen? And it has happened.


Did you know the `hockey stick' graph had been debunked? That alone should
have raised alarms.


Some scientists who are skeptics have likened the `global warming' following
to `astrology', it strikes them as so ridiculous.


See....trying to divert me or shut me down by belittling me for `how much *I*
pay into it, and completely avoiding answering the simple questions I've posed
on it, only demonstrates your lack of knowledge on the subject.


Like those who would silence all opposition to the `global warming' scam, you
try to brow-beat, embarass, and/or humiliate me into silence. But you won't
succeed. I will post on this matter as I choose. I will continue to pose the
various simple questions you find so hard to face...that you cannot seem to
find answers to, and instead try silly diversion off the main subject matter
in an attempt to silence me.


You haven't answered even one of those questions...only insulted me, thrown
silly insults and half-truths at me...which tells me you aren't real sure of
your belief in the `global warming' scheme, either. If you were...you'd have
made some attempt to come back with facts, not insults.



---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Check Out Doc's QWK Mail  Via Web BBS > DocsPlace.org  (1:123/140)