Text 33853, 99 rader
Skriven 2016-06-05 15:13:29 av Lee Lofaso (2:203/2)
  Kommentar till text 33838 av Allen Prunty (1:2320/100)
Ärende: Norwegian Justice
=========================
Hello Allen,

 LL>> OJ claims it was two mysterious Mexicans who did in his ex-wife
 LL>> and her lover.  Plenty of pictures show what was done to them.
 LL>> And yet, the LAPD says they have no other suspects.  Only OJ.
 LL>> Even though he has been acquitted on all counts ...

 AP> Only OJ and whatever higher power he believes in.  There are plenty of
 AP> pictures showing what was done to the young couple, but none showing OJ
red
 AP> handed in the act.

Of course there were pictures!  OJ was an actor!  The star
of Capricorn One!  And what a great movie that was!  We all
know OJ was innocent, not being involved in that conspiracy.
Our astronauts would never do a thing like that ...

 AP> In the case of Mel Ignato there was pictures, very gruesome pictures of
him
 AP> in the act of the crime.  I won't go into detail but it is unimaginable.

Mel Ignato never flew into space ...

 LL>>>> Based on new evidence he could have been retried.  Kinda like the
 LL>>>> OJ Simpson case.  Know what I mean?  Anyway, they got OJ locked up
 LL>>>> on other charges, so he ain't goin' nowhere.

 AP> Hopefully... he did it, he knows he did it... blast double jeapardy.

Just because the LAPD has no other suspects does not mean OJ did it.
The prosecution botched the case, and allowed OJ to use his charm on
the jury by trying on a pair a gloves he knew never fit.

"If the glove don't fit you must acquit!" - Johnnie Cochran

What a ladies' man.  And with a suave lawyer doin' all the talkin'
for him, OJ knew he was gonna remain a free man forever!

 LL>> OJ was framed.  It was a set-up.  They (friends of OJ's ex-wife)
 LL>> got him on trumped-up charges.  He will die in prison, having been
 LL>> convicted of a crime he did not commit.

 AP> Or did he?

I met Johnnie Cochran, at Southern University in Baton Rouge, as he
was the commencement speaker for a graduating class at the law school.
He said only one thing concerning the OJ trial - he was paid to keep
OJ out of jail.  That was the job he was paid to do.  And he did it
well.

I am not saying or suggesting that lawyers lie, or misrepresent
the truth.  The burden of proof is on the prosecution, to prove its
case, that the accused is guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt.

OJ had no reason or motive to kill his ex-wife (and lover).  He
had a lover, and could easily get more.  He had plenty of money.
A nice home.  Two lovely children.  No reason to blow it all by
offing the mother of his children.  And why would he care who
she was dating, or sleeping with?

It did not take long for a jury of his peers to come to the same
conclusion as me.  And they had to listen to all the testimony, by
all of the witnesses and experts.

Trial by television.  A movie that could only have been made
in Hollywood.  And let's not forget about that low-speed chase
that OJ led while driving his Ford Bronco on the expressway.

Like boxers, football players are not known for their brilliance.
Much of it due to concussions, whether diagnosed or not.

There is just no way OJ was smart enough to concoct a plan
to off two people and then hide the evidence where it could
never be found.  Not only that, but OJ was nowhere near as
fast as he was in his younger days.  The man could only walk
at a slow pace as his knees could barely hold him up.
Certainly his ex-wife and young lover could have easily
outrun him if he was coming at them with a knife.

 LL>> If we knew the criminals we have met we would all go insane.

 AP> Or are we?

This whole world is insane.
And nobody can get out of it alive.
So you tell me.

 AP> Have a great weekend.

The Swiss certainly will.  Election in Switzerland on June 5.
Swiss voting as to if they want to get free money ($2500/month)
no questions asked.  I wonder how many of them will vote "yes"?

Only an idiot would turn down free money ...

--Lee

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
 * Origin: news://eljaco.se (2:203/2)