Text 5183, 126 rader
Skriven 2009-04-24 01:06:32 av Ross Sauer (1:123/789.0)
   Kommentar till text 5179 av Ed Hulett (1:123/789.0)
Ärende: COGNITIVE DIFFICULTY.....
=================================
"Ed Hulett -> Ross Sauer" <1:123/789.0> wrote in
news:9296$HOLYSMOKE@JamNNTPd:

 RS>>>> Fine. Show me.

 EH>>> Just read some of the atheist sites.

 RS>> Like I said, SHOW ME.

 EH> Are you unable to use Google? I know you are always searching for
 EH> KITTEH!.

 EH>>> Just like the rest of the extreme left, you think that
 EH>   including EH>> alternatives to the theory of evolution is "shoving
 EH>   Christian EH>> mandatory rites among everyone" (sic).

 RS>> You have no idea what is the "extreme left."

 EH> Yes, I do and you fit right in.

 RS>> Here they are, stupid.
 RS>> http://www.cpusa.org/

 EH> Those are the fringe. You are the extreme left.

Are you calling me a communist?
How about I do like your crony does, and run straight to a lawyer?

Because I know damn well communism is, and always has been,a failure.

 RS>> If you continue to whine about your imaginary "extreme left," no
 EH>   wonder RS> you joined your cult.

 EH> Hahahahahahahahahaha!!!!

 EH> Are you trying to unseat Ceppa as the most stupid person in FIDO?

Nope. YOU are, FTB.

 RS>>>>>> One example: Mandating the Pledge of Allegiance in schools,
 EH>   as EH>>>>   it is now. RS> With that "under God" in it, that was
 EH>   stuck EH>>   into it EH>>   during McCarthyism in RS> 1954.

 EH>>>>> Blah blah blah...

 RS>>>> Is this a fact, or not?

 EH>>> No one is mandating the pledge. "[U]nder Gad" is a part of the
 EH>   pledge EH>> now and will remain so. It makes you look foolish to
 EH>   continue whining EH>> about it.

 RS>> BUllSHIT.

 EH>   http://www.politicalbase.com/issues/mandatory-pledge-of-
allegiance/31
 EH>   /

 EH> You dig up some fringe group with a website? Now try to use Google for
 EH> something constructive.

You do it, dipwit.

I'm sick of posting stuff that you ignore.

 RS>>>> If the loudest religion in government pushers had their way,
 EH>>>   *YOUR* RS> religion would be illegal.

 EH>>> You don't know what you are talking about. No religion, other
 EH>   than EH>> Islam, wants theocratic control of government.

 EH>>>>> What you people keep ignoring is that the real language in
 EH>   the EH>>   First EH>> Amendment states something entirely different.
 EH>   "Congress EH>>   shall make EH>> not law respecting the
 EH>   establishment of religion, or EH>>   prohibiting the EH>> free
 EH>   exercise thereof;...

 RS>>>> And this means as the Supreme Court keeps stating, over and
 EH>   over EH>>   and RS> over is that our government is *NEUTRAL*
 EH>   regarding religion.

 EH>>> Exactly!

 RS>> And you theocrats continue to run to the courts.

 EH> Huh? When have I or the LDS Church ran to the courts WRT the First
 EH> Amendment?

http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=15569

 EH>>> The closest Islamic congregational building from here is about
 EH>   4 miles EH>> away. It's also very small.

 RS>> Want a bigger one?

 EH> I couldn't care less as long as it's on their own property.

You want one right next door?

 RS>>>> Would you just ignore it? Fat chance.

 EH>>> A loud speaker calling to prayer is different than an innocuous
 EH>   Ten EH>> Commandments on display in a court of law.

 RS>> Because all of them are against the Constitution.

 EH> No, they are not. The display of the Ten Commandments is not
 EH> unconstitutional.

On church property.
On public property, no.

 RS>>>> Look up Roy Moore, then get back to me.

 EH>>> Why should I? You want to make a point, make it!

 RS>> Look it up, that is, if you're not too stupid to do so.

 EH> Right after you look up the various atheist sites that want to get rid
 EH> of any semblance of religion.

You're a liar and a lazy jerk.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Moore

--- Xnews/5.04.25
 * Origin: Fidonet Via Newsreader - http://www.easternstar.info (1:123/789.0)