Text 317, 35 rader
Skriven 2006-04-20 18:26:05 av David Drummond (3:640/305)
    Kommentar till text 307 av mark lewis (1:3634/12.0)
Ärende: none
============
mark lewis -> David Drummond wrote:

 DD>>> A "properly configured mailer" expects to find an dialable phone
 DD>>> number, or "Unpublished" in that field in the nodelist.

 ml>> correction... a properly configured mailer expects to find a
 ml> contactable number in that field or "-Unpublished-"...

 DD>> As documented in which version of Policy?

 ml> ermmm... policy doesn't speak to this so why bring policy up? this is a
 ml> technical situation not a social or political one... however, you and
 ml> others of similar mind desire only to confuse the issue(s) and stir the
 ml> fecal matter in the barrel...

 ml> should i also mention that =you= have a(n annoying) habit of trying to
 ml> put policy into things where it doesn't belong...

Policy belongs everywhere in Fidonet. It is the glue that binds us together.

I see that the Z1C is going to move the IP contact info to the INA flag and
leave the phone number empty. How are those in Z1 running shim kludges going to
cope with that? How many in Z1 will this actually effect?

Why must the whole Fidonet world bow to your personal requirement of running a
POTS mailer as an IP mailer? Isn't it time YOU upgraded to a REAL IP mailer?

-- 

regards

David

---
 * Origin: So where the bloody hell are you? (3:640/305)