Fidonet echomail

Tillbaka till svenska Fidonet
English Information Debug

OS2BBS 0/787
OS2DOSBBS 0/580
OS2HW 0/42
OS2INET 0/37
OS2LAN 0/134
OS2PROG 0/36
OS2REXX 0/113
OS2USER-L 207
OS2 0/4786
OSDEBATE 0/18996
PASCAL 0/490
PERL 0/457
PHP 0/45
POINTS 0/405
POLITICS 0/29554
POL_INC 0/14731
PSION 103
R20_ADMIN 1121
R20_AMATORRADIO 0/2
R20_BEST_OF_FIDONET 13
R20_CHAT 0/893
R20_DEPP 0/3
R20_DEV 399
R20_ECHO2 1379
R20_ECHOPRES 0/35
R20_ESTAT 0/719
R20_FIDONETPROG...
...RAM.MYPOINT 0/2
R20_FIDONETPROGRAM 0/22
R20_FIDONET 0/248
R20_FILEFIND 0/24
R20_FILEFOUND 0/22
R20_HIFI 0/3
R20_INFO2 3218
R20_INTERNET 0/12940
R20_INTRESSE 0/60
R20_INTR_KOM 0/99
R20_KANDIDAT.CHAT 42
R20_KANDIDAT 28
R20_KOM_DEV 112
R20_KONTROLL 0/13270
R20_KORSET 0/18
R20_LOKALTRAFIK 0/24
R20_MODERATOR 0/1852
R20_NC 76
R20_NET200 245
R20_NETWORK.OTH...
...ERNETS 0/13
R20_OPERATIVSYS...
...TEM.LINUX 0/44
R20_PROGRAMVAROR 0/1
R20_REC2NEC 534
R20_SFOSM 0/340
R20_SF 0/108
R20_SPRAK.ENGLISH 0/1
R20_SQUISH 107
R20_TEST 2
R20_WORST_OF_FIDONET 12
RAR 0/9
RA_MULTI 106
RA_UTIL 0/162
REGCON.EUR 0/2056
REGCON 0/13
SCIENCE 0/1206
SF 0/239
SHAREWARE_SUPPORT 0/5146
SHAREWRE 0/14
SIMPSONS 0/169
STATS_OLD1 0/2539.065
STATS_OLD2 0/2530
STATS_OLD3 0/2395.095
STATS_OLD4 0/1692.25
SURVIVOR 0/495
SYSOPS_CORNER 0/3
SYSOP 0/84
TAGLINES 0/112
TEAMOS2 0/4530
TECH 0/2617
TEST.444 0/105
TRAPDOOR 0/19
TREK 0/755
TUB 0/290
UFO 0/40
UNIX 0/1316
USA_EURLINK 0/102
USR_MODEMS 0/1
VATICAN 0/2740
VIETNAM_VETS 0/14
VIRUS 0/378
VIRUS_INFO 0/201
VISUAL_BASIC 0/473
WHITEHOUSE 0/5187
WIN2000 0/101
WIN32 0/30
WIN95 0/4288
WIN95_OLD1 0/70272
WINDOWS 0/1517
WWB_SYSOP 0/419
WWB_TECH 0/810
ZCC-PUBLIC 0/1
ZEC 4

4DOS 0/134
ABORTION 0/7
ALASKA_CHAT 0/506
ALLFIX_FILE 0/1313
ALLFIX_FILE_OLD1 0/7997
ALT_DOS 0/152
AMATEUR_RADIO 0/1039
AMIGASALE 0/14
AMIGA 0/331
AMIGA_INT 0/1
AMIGA_PROG 0/20
AMIGA_SYSOP 0/26
ANIME 0/15
ARGUS 0/924
ASCII_ART 0/340
ASIAN_LINK 0/651
ASTRONOMY 0/417
AUDIO 0/92
AUTOMOBILE_RACING 0/105
BABYLON5 0/17862
BAG 135
BATPOWER 0/361
BBBS.ENGLISH 0/382
BBSLAW 0/109
BBS_ADS 0/5290
BBS_INTERNET 0/507
BIBLE 0/3563
BINKD 0/1119
BINKLEY 0/215
BLUEWAVE 0/2173
CABLE_MODEMS 0/25
CBM 0/46
CDRECORD 0/66
CDROM 0/20
CLASSIC_COMPUTER 0/378
COMICS 0/15
CONSPRCY 0/899
COOKING 32896
COOKING_OLD1 0/24719
COOKING_OLD2 0/40862
COOKING_OLD3 0/37489
COOKING_OLD4 0/35496
COOKING_OLD5 9370
C_ECHO 0/189
C_PLUSPLUS 0/31
DIRTY_DOZEN 0/201
DOORGAMES 0/2056
DOS_INTERNET 0/196
duplikat 6002
ECHOLIST 0/18295
EC_SUPPORT 0/318
ELECTRONICS 0/359
ELEKTRONIK.GER 1534
ENET.LINGUISTIC 0/13
ENET.POLITICS 0/4
ENET.SOFT 0/11701
ENET.SYSOP 33903
ENET.TALKS 0/32
ENGLISH_TUTOR 0/2000
EVOLUTION 0/1335
FDECHO 0/217
FDN_ANNOUNCE 0/7068
FIDONEWS 24126
FIDONEWS_OLD1 0/49742
FIDONEWS_OLD2 0/35949
FIDONEWS_OLD3 0/30874
FIDONEWS_OLD4 0/37224
FIDO_SYSOP 12852
FIDO_UTIL 0/180
FILEFIND 0/209
FILEGATE 0/212
FILM 0/18
FNEWS_PUBLISH 4408
FN_SYSOP 41678
FN_SYSOP_OLD1 71952
FTP_FIDO 0/2
FTSC_PUBLIC 0/13599
FUNNY 0/4886
GENEALOGY.EUR 0/71
GET_INFO 105
GOLDED 0/408
HAM 0/16070
HOLYSMOKE 0/6791
HOT_SITES 0/1
HTMLEDIT 0/71
HUB203 466
HUB_100 264
HUB_400 39
HUMOR 0/29
IC 0/2851
INTERNET 0/424
INTERUSER 0/3
IP_CONNECT 719
JAMNNTPD 0/233
JAMTLAND 0/47
KATTY_KORNER 0/41
LAN 0/16
LINUX-USER 0/19
LINUXHELP 0/1155
LINUX 0/22092
LINUX_BBS 0/957
mail 18.68
mail_fore_ok 249
MENSA 0/341
MODERATOR 0/102
MONTE 0/992
MOSCOW_OKLAHOMA 0/1245
MUFFIN 0/783
MUSIC 0/321
N203_STAT 926
N203_SYSCHAT 313
NET203 321
NET204 69
NET_DEV 0/10
NORD.ADMIN 0/101
NORD.CHAT 0/2572
NORD.FIDONET 189
NORD.HARDWARE 0/28
NORD.KULTUR 0/114
NORD.PROG 0/32
NORD.SOFTWARE 0/88
NORD.TEKNIK 0/58
NORD 0/453
OCCULT_CHAT 0/93

Möte OSDEBATE, 18996 texter

Text 13807, 135 rader
Skriven 2006-11-09 09:47:54 av Gary Britt (1:379/45)
  Kommentar till text 13800 av John Beckett (1:379/45)
Ärende: Re: Firewall Question
=============================
From: Gary Britt <glbNOSPAM@gencogDOTcom.com>

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030704050400090706000009
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


OK, thanks for the info.  I have a mix of winXP, win2K,  and sometimes win98
machine, so I usually keep net bios turned on.  If I understood you correctly
you are saying that if I use static IP addresses for the machines in the peer
network and make entries in each machine's hosts file then I wouldn't need net
bios?

If a machine is named "glb_mx7340" for example would the host entry look like
this:  "192.168.0.102   glb_mx7340"   ??

And if I do this than to setup network shares and printer shares I would just
need port 445 open on each machine?  Both TCP and UDP or  just one or the
other?

Thanks,

Gary

John Beckett wrote:
> Gary Britt <glbNOSPAM@gencogDOTcom.com> wrote in message
> news:<4552a6a1$1@w3.nls.net>:
>
>> OK, so if you have a software firewall, I thought one of the advantages
>> of having a software firewall was to keep virii and trojans from your
>> side of the router/hardware firewall from getting on your machine.
>>
>
> You (should) hear mostly about this in a corporate environment where a
> workstation probably does NOT have shares and so does not need to open
> holes to allow incoming connections. Therefore a worm on the local network
> wold be much less likely to be able to penetrate such a workstation.
>
> But, as you say, if you share a folder then you need to open access to at
> least some ports, and if a worm could exploit the service that you have
> exposed, then you could be owned.
>
> If you have disabled NBT (NetBIOS-over-TCP) you only need to open access
> to destination port 445/tcp (but then you would need working DNS or hosts
> files to resolve names).
>
> Your firewall would still block connections to other ports not related to
> sharing, so you would get some protection (although there shouldn't be
> many of those ports on a workstation).
>
> But your essential point is correct.
>
> John
>
>


--------------030704050400090706000009
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
OK, thanks for the info.&nbsp; I have a mix of winXP, win2K,&nbsp; and
sometimes
win98 machine, so I usually keep net bios turned on.&nbsp; If I understood you
correctly you are saying that if I use static IP addresses for the machines in
the peer network and make entries in each machine's hosts file then I wouldn't
need net bios?<br>
<br>
If a machine is named "glb_mx7340" for example would the host entry look like
this:&nbsp; "192.168.0.102&nbsp;&nbsp; glb_mx7340"&nbsp;&nbsp; ??<br>
<br>
And if I do this than to setup network shares and printer shares I would just
need port 445 open on each machine?&nbsp; Both TCP and UDP or&nbsp; just one or
the other?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Gary<br>
<br>
John Beckett wrote:
<blockquote cite="midkll5l215h9ulsmc3uus8vqmnilk3dhjji2@4ax.com"
 type="cite">
  <pre wrap="">Gary Britt <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:glbNOSPAM@gencogDOTcom.com">&lt;glbNOSPAM@gencogDOTcom.com&gt;</a>
wrote in message
news:<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:4552a6a1$1@w3.nls.net">&lt;4
552a6a1$1@w3.nls.net&gt;</a>:
  </pre>
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre wrap="">OK, so if you have a software firewall, I thought one of the
advantages
of having a software firewall was to keep virii and trojans from your side of
the router/hardware firewall from getting on your machine.
    </pre>
  </blockquote>
  <pre wrap=""><!---->
You (should) hear mostly about this in a corporate environment where a
workstation probably does NOT have shares and so does not need to open holes to
allow incoming connections. Therefore a worm on the local network wold be much
less likely to be able to penetrate such a workstation.

But, as you say, if you share a folder then you need to open access to at least
some ports, and if a worm could exploit the service that you have exposed, then
you could be owned.

If you have disabled NBT (NetBIOS-over-TCP) you only need to open access to
destination port 445/tcp (but then you would need working DNS or hosts files to
resolve names).

Your firewall would still block connections to other ports not related to
sharing, so you would get some protection (although there shouldn't be many of
those ports on a workstation).

But your essential point is correct.

John

  </pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>

--------------030704050400090706000009--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
 * Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)