Text 1841, 203 rader
Skriven 2005-01-09 10:14:20 av Rich (1:379/45)
Kommentar till text 1837 av Mike '/m' (1:379/45)
Ärende: Re: Usage history
=========================
From: "Rich" <@>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_042B_01C4F633.FC8E0F70
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
And obviously you didn't bother to read it because there is mention =
of deprecated services. This of course has nothing to do with the lies = and
FUD you post. Confirming that you understand you and others make = false
claims won't redeem your bad behavior or make you any more = credible.
Rich
"Mike '/m'" <mike@barkto.com> wrote in message =
news:mvh2u017gc7nsf6f7ed6atqms8f4nh9n6a@4ax.com...
While you try to diminish the veracity of what others say by pointing =
to a
current Microsoft web page, you conveniently (and probably =
intentionally)
overlook the fact that Microsoft has steadily cut back on Passport's
capabilities to the gutted feature list that you now point to.
Passport had problems being accepted more for what it was, than for =
what it
now is. Microsoft's reputation and strategies overshadows what it is, =
and
sites like eBay are now distancing themselves from the current =
Passport.
/m
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 01:48:12 -0800, "Rich" <@> wrote:
> If you mean to question what Passport is to Microsoft you should =
use Microsoft's claims about the service not what other people write or =
claim. It's not difficult to find folks that write inaccurate or = unclear
garbage on virtually any subject. If you want to question such = garbage you
should ask the people that wrote it. If you want to know = what Passport is to
Microsoft see = http://www.passport.net/Consumer/ConsumerQA.asp?lc=3D1033. I
guess I = was wrong to think it was obvious that to see how Passport is
presented = one look at what Passport claims about itself instead of looking at
what = random people speculate.
>
>Rich
>
> "Mike N." <mike@u-spam-u-die.net> wrote in message =
news:jjb1u0pp4b4vajc8cdfbna0aamvstuvuka@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:57:26 -0800, "Rich" <@> wrote:
>
> >You can refuse to answer questions or clarify what you wrote =
earlier
>
> If you mean this is a question...it's the only thing remotely =
close to a
> question.
>
> > You will have to define the second through fourth terms since =
I have no idea what they are to you
>
> I don't have a clear idea myself of the second through fourth =
terms; I
> was just picking services that had been tied to Passport by the =
media in
> the past; for example attaching Passport to AD, then automatically =
using
> that single signon when accessing the internet ->"identity =
manager".
>
> Enter information: credit card for example. Automatically =
submit the
> credit card when applying passport to certain sites. --> =
"information
> manager".
>
> I was just trying to elicit a definition of Passport from you =
since
> every reference to Passport-related services seemed to result in a =
"that's
> not what it is" or "that's a bogus claim", or "that's not related =
to
> Passport" response. You are studiously avoiding making a clear =
statement.
------=_NextPart_000_042B_01C4F633.FC8E0F70
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.3790.1289" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> And obviously you didn't =
bother to=20
read it because there is mention of deprecated services. This of =
course=20
has nothing to do with the lies and FUD you post. Confirming that =
you=20
understand you and others make false claims won't redeem your bad = behavior
or=20
make you any more credible.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rich</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Mike '/m'" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:mike@barkto.com">mike@barkto.com</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:mvh2u017gc7nsf6f7ed6atqms8f4nh9n6a@4ax.com">news:mvh2u017gc7=
nsf6f7ed6atqms8f4nh9n6a@4ax.com</A>...</DIV><BR>While=20
you try to diminish the veracity of what others say by pointing to=20
a<BR>current Microsoft web page, you conveniently (and probably=20
intentionally)<BR>overlook the fact that Microsoft has steadily cut =
back on=20
Passport's<BR>capabilities to the gutted feature list that you now =
point=20
to.<BR><BR>Passport had problems being accepted more for what it was, =
than for=20
what it<BR>now is. Microsoft's reputation and strategies =
overshadows=20
what it is, and<BR>sites like eBay are now distancing themselves from =
the=20
current Passport.<BR><BR> /m<BR><BR><BR>On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 =
01:48:12=20
-0800, "Rich" <@> wrote:<BR><BR>> If you mean to =
question=20
what Passport is to Microsoft you should use Microsoft's claims about =
the=20
service not what other people write or claim. It's not difficult =
to find=20
folks that write inaccurate or unclear garbage on virtually any =
subject. =20
If you want to question such garbage you should ask the people that =
wrote=20
it. If you want to know what Passport is to Microsoft see <A=20
=
href=3D"http://www.passport.net/Consumer/ConsumerQA.asp?lc=3D1033">http:/=
/www.passport.net/Consumer/ConsumerQA.asp?lc=3D1033</A>. =20
I guess I was wrong to think it was obvious that to see how Passport =
is=20
presented one look at what Passport claims about itself instead of =
looking at=20
what random people =
speculate.<BR>><BR>>Rich<BR>><BR>> "Mike=20
N." <<A =
href=3D"mailto:mike@u-spam-u-die.net">mike@u-spam-u-die.net</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:jjb1u0pp4b4vajc8cdfbna0aamvstuvuka@4ax.com">news:jjb1u0pp4b4=
vajc8cdfbna0aamvstuvuka@4ax.com</A>...<BR>> =20
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:57:26 -0800, "Rich" <@>=20
wrote:<BR>><BR>> >You can refuse to answer questions or =
clarify=20
what you wrote earlier<BR>><BR>> If you mean =
this is a=20
question...it's the only thing remotely close to a<BR>> =20
question.<BR>><BR>> > You will =
have to=20
define the second through fourth terms since I have no idea what they =
are to=20
you<BR>><BR>> I don't have a clear idea =
myself=20
of the second through fourth terms; I<BR>> was just picking =
services=20
that had been tied to Passport by the media in<BR>> the past; =
for=20
example attaching Passport to AD, then automatically =
using<BR>> that=20
single signon when accessing the internet ->"identity=20
manager".<BR>><BR>> Enter information: credit =
card for=20
example. Automatically submit the<BR>> credit =
card when=20
applying passport to certain sites. --> "information<BR>> =20
manager".<BR>><BR>> I was just trying to =
elicit=20
a definition of Passport from you since<BR>> every reference =
to=20
Passport-related services seemed to result in a "that's<BR>> =
not what=20
it is" or "that's a bogus claim", or "that's not related =
to<BR>> =20
Passport" response. You are studiously avoiding making a =
clear=20
statement.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_042B_01C4F633.FC8E0F70--
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)
|