Text 1842, 79 rader
Skriven 2005-01-09 14:41:58 av Mike '/m' (1:379/45)
   Kommentar till text 1841 av Rich (1:379/45)
Ärende: Re: Usage history
=========================
From: Mike '/m' <mike@barkto.com>


I had read it before I posted.  Sorry Rich, but all I can give you is a Nice
Try.  :-)

 /m



On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 10:14:21 -0800, "Rich" <@> wrote:

>   And obviously you didn't bother to read it because there is mention of
deprecated services.  This of course has nothing to do with the lies and FUD
you post.  Confirming that you understand you and others make false claims
won't redeem your bad behavior or make you any more credible.
>
>Rich
>
>  "Mike '/m'" <mike@barkto.com> wrote in message
news:mvh2u017gc7nsf6f7ed6atqms8f4nh9n6a@4ax.com...
>
>  While you try to diminish the veracity of what others say by pointing to a
>  current Microsoft web page, you conveniently (and probably intentionally)
>  overlook the fact that Microsoft has steadily cut back on Passport's
>  capabilities to the gutted feature list that you now point to.
>
>  Passport had problems being accepted more for what it was, than for what it
>  now is.  Microsoft's reputation and strategies overshadows what it is, and
>  sites like eBay are now distancing themselves from the current Passport.
>
>   /m
>
>
>  On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 01:48:12 -0800, "Rich" <@> wrote:
>
>  >   If you mean to question what Passport is to Microsoft you should use
Microsoft's claims about the service not what other people write or claim. It's
not difficult to find folks that write inaccurate or unclear garbage on
virtually any subject.  If you want to question such garbage you should ask the
people that wrote it.  If you want to know what Passport is to Microsoft see
http://www.passport.net/Consumer/ConsumerQA.asp?lc=1033.  I guess I was wrong
to think it was obvious that to see how Passport is presented one look at what
Passport claims about itself instead of looking at what random people
speculate.
>  >
>  >Rich
>  >
>  >  "Mike N." <mike@u-spam-u-die.net> wrote in message
news:jjb1u0pp4b4vajc8cdfbna0aamvstuvuka@4ax.com...
>  >  On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:57:26 -0800, "Rich" <@> wrote:
>  >
>  >  >You can refuse to answer questions or clarify what you wrote earlier
>  >
>  >    If you mean this is a question...it's the only thing remotely close to
a
>  >  question.
>  >
>  >  >     You will have to define the second through fourth terms since I
have no idea what they are to you
>  >
>  >     I don't have a clear idea myself of the second through fourth terms; I
>  >  was just picking services that had been tied to Passport by the media in
>  >  the past; for example attaching Passport to AD, then automatically using
>  >  that single signon when accessing the internet ->"identity manager".
>  >
>  >    Enter information: credit card for example.   Automatically submit the
>  >  credit card when applying passport to certain sites. --> "information
>  >  manager".
>  >
>  >     I was just trying to elicit a definition of Passport from you since
>  >  every reference to Passport-related services seemed to result in a
"that's
>  >  not what it is" or "that's a bogus claim", or "that's not related to
>  >  Passport" response.   You are studiously avoiding making a clear
statement.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
 * Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)