Text 1874, 277 rader
Skriven 2005-01-10 16:31:30 av Rich (1:379/45)
Kommentar till text 1872 av Mike '/m' (1:379/45)
Ärende: Re: Usage history
=========================
From: "Rich" <@>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_04B1_01C4F731.D794AE00
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
And you lie again. Typical.
Rich
"Mike '/m'" <mike@barkto.com> wrote in message =
news:es56u091mb2tligg9stcl7e7mr8t5vf9ou@4ax.com...
I knew no such thing. Another Nice Try for you, though.
/m
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 14:50:56 -0800, "Rich" <@> wrote:
> Then you knew you were lying. Typical.
>
>Rich
>
> "Mike '/m'" <mike@barkto.com> wrote in message =
news:d423u0pggs9a30dj9dnqp0codccsbogie8@4ax.com...
>
> I had read it before I posted. Sorry Rich, but all I can give you =
is a Nice
> Try. :-)
>
> /m
>
> =20
>
> On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 10:14:21 -0800, "Rich" <@> wrote:
>
> > And obviously you didn't bother to read it because there is =
mention of deprecated services. This of course has nothing to do with = the
lies and FUD you post. Confirming that you understand you and = others make
false claims won't redeem your bad behavior or make you any = more credible.
> >
> >Rich
> >
> > "Mike '/m'" <mike@barkto.com> wrote in message =
news:mvh2u017gc7nsf6f7ed6atqms8f4nh9n6a@4ax.com...
> >
> > While you try to diminish the veracity of what others say by =
pointing to a
> > current Microsoft web page, you conveniently (and probably =
intentionally)
> > overlook the fact that Microsoft has steadily cut back on =
Passport's
> > capabilities to the gutted feature list that you now point to.
> >
> > Passport had problems being accepted more for what it was, than =
for what it
> > now is. Microsoft's reputation and strategies overshadows what =
it is, and
> > sites like eBay are now distancing themselves from the current =
Passport.
> >
> > /m
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 01:48:12 -0800, "Rich" <@> wrote:
> >
> > > If you mean to question what Passport is to Microsoft you =
should use Microsoft's claims about the service not what other people = write
or claim. It's not difficult to find folks that write inaccurate = or unclear
garbage on virtually any subject. If you want to question = such garbage you
should ask the people that wrote it. If you want to = know what Passport is to
Microsoft see = http://www.passport.net/Consumer/ConsumerQA.asp?lc=3D1033. I
guess I = was wrong to think it was obvious that to see how Passport is
presented = one look at what Passport claims about itself instead of looking at
what = random people speculate.
> > >
> > >Rich
> > >
> > > "Mike N." <mike@u-spam-u-die.net> wrote in message =
news:jjb1u0pp4b4vajc8cdfbna0aamvstuvuka@4ax.com...
> > > On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:57:26 -0800, "Rich" <@> wrote:
> > >
> > > >You can refuse to answer questions or clarify what you wrote =
earlier
> > >
> > > If you mean this is a question...it's the only thing =
remotely close to a
> > > question.
> > >
> > > > You will have to define the second through fourth terms =
since I have no idea what they are to you
> > >
> > > I don't have a clear idea myself of the second through =
fourth terms; I
> > > was just picking services that had been tied to Passport by =
the media in
> > > the past; for example attaching Passport to AD, then =
automatically using
> > > that single signon when accessing the internet ->"identity =
manager".
> > >
> > > Enter information: credit card for example. Automatically =
submit the
> > > credit card when applying passport to certain sites. --> =
"information
> > > manager".
> > >
> > > I was just trying to elicit a definition of Passport from =
you since
> > > every reference to Passport-related services seemed to result =
in a "that's
> > > not what it is" or "that's a bogus claim", or "that's not =
related to
> > > Passport" response. You are studiously avoiding making a =
clear statement.
------=_NextPart_000_04B1_01C4F731.D794AE00
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.3790.1289" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> And you lie again. =20
Typical.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rich</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Mike '/m'" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:mike@barkto.com">mike@barkto.com</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:es56u091mb2tligg9stcl7e7mr8t5vf9ou@4ax.com">news:es56u091mb2=
tligg9stcl7e7mr8t5vf9ou@4ax.com</A>...</DIV><BR>I=20
knew no such thing. Another Nice Try for you,=20
though.<BR><BR> /m<BR><BR>On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 14:50:56 -0800, =
"Rich"=20
<@> wrote:<BR><BR>> Then you knew you were =
lying. =20
Typical.<BR>><BR>>Rich<BR>><BR>> "Mike '/m'" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:mike@barkto.com">mike@barkto.com</A>> wrote in =
message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:d423u0pggs9a30dj9dnqp0codccsbogie8@4ax.com">news:d423u0pggs9=
a30dj9dnqp0codccsbogie8@4ax.com</A>...<BR>><BR>> =20
I had read it before I posted. Sorry Rich, but all I can give =
you is a=20
Nice<BR>> Try. :-)<BR>><BR>> =20
/m<BR>><BR>> <BR>><BR>> On Sun, 9 Jan =
2005=20
10:14:21 -0800, "Rich" <@> wrote:<BR>><BR>> =
> =20
And obviously you didn't bother to read it because there is mention of =
deprecated services. This of course has nothing to do with the =
lies and=20
FUD you post. Confirming that you understand you and others make =
false=20
claims won't redeem your bad behavior or make you any more=20
credible.<BR>> ><BR>> >Rich<BR>> =20
><BR>> > "Mike '/m'" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:mike@barkto.com">mike@barkto.com</A>> wrote in =
message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:mvh2u017gc7nsf6f7ed6atqms8f4nh9n6a@4ax.com">news:mvh2u017gc7=
nsf6f7ed6atqms8f4nh9n6a@4ax.com</A>...<BR>> =20
><BR>> > While you try to diminish the veracity =
of what=20
others say by pointing to a<BR>> > current Microsoft =
web=20
page, you conveniently (and probably intentionally)<BR>> =
> =20
overlook the fact that Microsoft has steadily cut back on=20
Passport's<BR>> > capabilities to the gutted feature =
list=20
that you now point to.<BR>> ><BR>> > =
Passport=20
had problems being accepted more for what it was, than for what=20
it<BR>> > now is. Microsoft's reputation and=20
strategies overshadows what it is, and<BR>> > sites =
like=20
eBay are now distancing themselves from the current =
Passport.<BR>> =20
><BR>> > /m<BR>> =
><BR>> =20
><BR>> > On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 01:48:12 -0800, =
"Rich"=20
<@> wrote:<BR>> ><BR>> > =
> =20
If you mean to question what Passport is to Microsoft you should use=20
Microsoft's claims about the service not what other people write or=20
claim. It's not difficult to find folks that write inaccurate or =
unclear=20
garbage on virtually any subject. If you want to question such =
garbage=20
you should ask the people that wrote it. If you want to know =
what=20
Passport is to Microsoft see <A=20
=
href=3D"http://www.passport.net/Consumer/ConsumerQA.asp?lc=3D1033">http:/=
/www.passport.net/Consumer/ConsumerQA.asp?lc=3D1033</A>. =20
I guess I was wrong to think it was obvious that to see how Passport =
is=20
presented one look at what Passport claims about itself instead of =
looking at=20
what random people speculate.<BR>> > =
><BR>> =20
> >Rich<BR>> > ><BR>> =
> =20
> "Mike N." <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:mike@u-spam-u-die.net">mike@u-spam-u-die.net</A>> =
wrote in=20
message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:jjb1u0pp4b4vajc8cdfbna0aamvstuvuka@4ax.com">news:jjb1u0pp4b4=
vajc8cdfbna0aamvstuvuka@4ax.com</A>...<BR>> =20
> > On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:57:26 -0800, "Rich" =
<@>=20
wrote:<BR>> > ><BR>> > =
> =20
>You can refuse to answer questions or clarify what you wrote=20
earlier<BR>> > ><BR>> > =20
> If you mean this is a question...it's the only =
thing=20
remotely close to a<BR>> > > =20
question.<BR>> > ><BR>> > =
> =20
> You will have to define the second =
through fourth=20
terms since I have no idea what they are to you<BR>> =
> =20
><BR>> > > I don't =
have a=20
clear idea myself of the second through fourth terms; I<BR>> =20
> > was just picking services that had been tied to =
Passport=20
by the media in<BR>> > > the past; for =
example=20
attaching Passport to AD, then automatically using<BR>> =
> =20
> that single signon when accessing the internet =
->"identity=20
manager".<BR>> > ><BR>> > =20
> Enter information: credit card for =
example. =20
Automatically submit the<BR>> > > credit =
card when=20
applying passport to certain sites. --> "information<BR>> =20
> > manager".<BR>> > =
><BR>> =20
> > I was just trying to elicit a=20
definition of Passport from you since<BR>> > =
> =20
every reference to Passport-related services seemed to result in a=20
"that's<BR>> > > not what it is" or "that's =
a bogus=20
claim", or "that's not related to<BR>> > > =20
Passport" response. You are studiously avoiding making a =
clear=20
statement.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_04B1_01C4F731.D794AE00--
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)
|