Text 4302, 654 rader
Skriven 2005-05-22 11:29:14 av Rich (1:379/45)
Kommentar till text 4297 av Randy (1:379/45)
Ärende: Re: Defending your own nonsense
=======================================
From: "Rich" <@>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0165_01C55EC1.7C2CD860
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
You should expect to be able to defend whatever nonsense you post. =
If you post nonsense should you not expect to be called on it? Should = you
not expect to defend it if questioned? Maybe you and mike miller = believe
that you are above being challenged. mike miller we all know = has an agenda.
Look at just this thread to see how when questioned he = either changes the
topic or declares that he has nothing more to say = never actually defending
any of his claims.
Rich
"Randy" <@> wrote in message news:4290b4e2$1@w3.nls.net...
In our little corner of the world, Shupak acts like a kid with a new =
chain=20
saw: everything is game for cutting down.
As for his behavior here, here's a thought: I don't belive that MSFT =
offers=20
training on being a boorish duplicitous asshole-they activiely seek it =
out=20
and reward it.
Have a look at http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/legal/buscond/ and do a =
search for where the word "honest" appears.
Then I saw this:
"You may also call the Business Conduct Line at 1-877-320-MSFT (6738). =
If=20
you are calling from outside the United States, you may make a collect =
call=20
to the Business Conduct Line by accessing an international operator =
and=20
asking to place a collect call to 1-704-540-0139. The Business Conduct =
Line=20
is a dedicated, toll-free phone line that is available to you 24 hours =
a=20
day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. It is operated by an external=20
third-party vendor that has trained professionals to take your calls, =
in=20
confidence, and report your concerns to the Microsoft Director of =
Compliance=20
for appropriate action. Your phone calls to the Business Conduct Line =
may be=20
made anonymously. "
'nuff said?
"Mike '/m'" <mike@barkto.com> wrote in message=20
news:fb0191li9skdil3l444686d38bgr5un24f@4ax.com...
>
> I think Joe Barr was just the first to see through Rich Shupak's
> diversionary tactics [among other thigns] in online discussions.
>
> What I wonder is if Microsoft's online persona go through some =
manner of
> training, because many of them seem to use the same tactics over and
> over.
>
> /m<shrug>
>
>
> On Sun, 22 May 2005 00:18:26 -0500, "Randy" <@> wrote:
>
>>Who whould have thought that Joe Barr is right.
>> "Rich" <@> wrote in message news:428eb385@w3.nls.net...
>> I find it hard to believe you can be such an idiot and not know =
it.=20
>> Read over your spin in this thread starting with your claims that=20
>> everyone except the itunes store is a loser. You are saying more =
than=20
>> the obvious that apple's investment in their itunes store is a bet. =
I=20
>> can't believe you have the audacity to state in one sentence that =
you are=20
>> voicing no opinion on the itunes store both after doing so and =
before=20
>> doing so again. You are spinning so fast you can't see.
>>
>> As for your follow on bullshit, there is no lock in and never =
was.=20
>> Unlike apple, Microsoft provides choice. Go ahead, continue your=20
>> dishonesty, and pretend you have none. Make sure you mention how =
you=20
>> have no choice everytime you mention your use any of the very large =
set=20
>> of non-Microsoft hardware, software, and services Microsoft enables =
for=20
>> Windows.
>>
>> Rich
>>
>> "Mike '/m'" <mike@barkto.com> wrote in message=20
>> news:mg5t819ipve721e41u345o5l2ebiv5p3ev@4ax.com...
>> > Keep spinning if that is what you need to live with =
yourself.
>>
>> I live with myself just fine Rich. I find no need to let =
computers
>> affect my living situation. But I have to wonder why you are
>> projecting?
>>
>>
>> > Do you really think the itunes store would sell the same if =
apple=20
>> did not lock in ipod users so that this was the only store they can =
use?
>>
>> I voice no opinion on the iTunes store. I merely say that =
Apple's=20
>> focus
>> is on iTunes and not necessarily iPod. iPod is the means, =
iTunes is
>> the end. And Microsoft is the also-ran, perhaps not even that.
>> Probably more of "too late to the party".
>>
>> Whenever Microsoft feels the need to trot out Mr. Gates to =
expound=20
>> upon
>> some "new direction", I know that Microsft has found themelves =
behind
>> the market leader and have belatedly realized that they need to =
try to
>> catch up.
>>
>>
>>
>> >> If users are not locked in, why would they pick the itunes =
store?
>>
>> Coming from a Microsoft employee, that is a very interesting =
comment.
>>
>> I mean, if the users were not locked into Windows, would they =
have
>> chosen IE over Netscape? It seems that Microsoft execs' emails=20
>> entered
>> as evidence in the anti-trist trials have stated that Microsoft =
needed
>> to leverage the Windows monopoly in order to make IE the defacto =
>> browser
>> "of choice".
>>
>> If the users were not locked in, would they choose WIndows Media =
in=20
>> the
>> percentages that they currently do?
>>
>> /m<probably not...>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 20 May 2005 18:56:30 -0700, "Rich" <@> wrote:
>>
>> > Keep spinning if that is what you need to live with =
yourself.
>> >
>> > Do you really think the itunes store would sell the same if =
apple=20
>> did not lock in ipod users so that this was the only store they can =
use?
>> >
>> > If users are not locked in, why would they pick the itunes =
store?
>> >
>> >Rich
>> >
>> > "Mike '/m'" <mike@barkto.com> wrote in message=20
>> news:s93t81dqsvf1bvef5vjpukf6n5ukvof7dp@4ax.com...
>> >
>> > It must really suck for your employer to be the loser in the =
online
>> > music race, eh Rich?
>> >
>> > Despite what you are trying to spin me as saying, I am =
actually=20
>> saying
>> > that Apple is betting on iTunes (an/or its video successor), =
not=20
>> iPod.
>> > I say no more or no less. Despite what you try to spin.
>> >
>> > Give those rotator cuffs a rest for a change, will ya?
>> >
>> > /m
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, 20 May 2005 17:15:01 -0700, "Rich" <@> wrote:
>> >
>> > > If you weren't blinded by your agenda, mike, you could =
see the=20
>> obvious and how silly you sound.
>> > >
>> > > Why will phones win out, for the same reason phones are =
winning=20
>> over many PDA users? Why carry two devices when you can carry one?
>> > >
>> > > Apple will follow Microsoft and I believe real in getting =
their=20
>> software onto phones. There is a difference from the ipod. Unless =
apple=20
>> restricts their OEM licensees from offering their users multiple =
choices,=20
>> the phone manufacturers and carriers have no reason to lock in =
their=20
>> customers to the itunes store like apple does.
>> > >
>> > >Rich
>> > >
>> > > "Mike '/m'" <mike@barkto.com> wrote in message=20
>> news:55ns81lbitvndvtrbj4407ueh8f7cbm5bo@4ax.com...
>> > >
>> > > It's not iPod that Apple is betting on, but iTunes (and =
its=20
>> video
>> > > follow-up). Apple is already putting iPod software on =
cell=20
>> phones to
>> > > allow them to access iTunes.
>> > >
>> > > Gates' comment was more of a specious smokescreen than =
anything=20
>> else.
>> > > Apple caught him napping in this space, and now he has to =
look=20
>> like he
>> > > was out in front all along.
>> > >
>> > > /m
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, 20 May 2005 14:01:23 +0100, Adam=20
>> <mmmmm_beer_mmmm_donuts@moes>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >Randy wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> I just 1 GB on my phone via miniSD-and I want MORE....
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 500+ of AAC-encoded songs-sweet!
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > >Ditto. I agree with Gates that the Ipod won't last & that =
the=20
>> phones
>> > > >will eat it's lunch. I have a nokia 6230 which I got coz =
it has=20
>> an MP3
>> > > >player & an fm radio....
>> > > >
>> > > >A mondo bizarro bit is that if you are listening to the =
radio=20
>> or the mp3
>> > > >player & someone calls you get the selected ringing =
tones....so=20
>> if like
>> > > >me you often set your phone to silent for meetings etc & =
then=20
>> "forget"
>> > > >to re-enable the ringer....then you are left wondering =
what's=20
>> going on
>> > > >coz the music/radio just suddenly goes....silent....
>> > > >
>> > > ><G>
>> > > >
>> > > >I had a look at the smart phones (Pocket pc, symbian etc) =
& was=20
>> very
>> > > >impressed but @ the end of the day...I just wanted music =
+=20
>> radio & a
>> > > >nice neat (small) phone.
>> > > >
>> > > >I like the way most of them now try wifi first for any =
net=20
>> related things.
>> > > >
>> > > >I reckon we're 2-3 years out from most people's =
"personal"=20
>> computer
>> > > >being the smartphone in their pocket.
>> > > >
>> > > >Adam
>=20
------=_NextPart_000_0165_01C55EC1.7C2CD860
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2627" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> You should expect to be =
able to defend=20
whatever nonsense you post. If you post nonsense should you not = expect
to=20
be called on it? Should you not expect to defend it if =
questioned? =20
Maybe you and mike miller believe that you are above being =
challenged. =20
mike miller we all know has an agenda. Look at just this thread to = see
how=20
when questioned he either changes the topic or declares that he has = nothing
more=20
to say never actually defending any of his claims.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rich</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Randy" <@> wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:4290b4e2$1@w3.nls.net">news:4290b4e2$1@w3.nls.net</A>...</DI=
V>In=20
our little corner of the world, Shupak acts like a kid with a new =
chain=20
<BR>saw: everything is game for cutting down.<BR><BR>As for his =
behavior here,=20
here's a thought: I don't belive that MSFT offers <BR>training on =
being a=20
boorish duplicitous asshole-they activiely seek it out <BR>and reward=20
it.<BR><BR>Have a look at <A=20
=
href=3D"http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/legal/buscond/">http://www.micros=
oft.com/mscorp/legal/buscond/</A>=20
and do a <BR>search for where the word "honest" appears.<BR><BR>Then I =
saw=20
this:<BR><BR>"You may also call the Business Conduct Line at =
1-877-320-MSFT=20
(6738). If <BR>you are calling from outside the United States, you may =
make a=20
collect call <BR>to the Business Conduct Line by accessing an =
international=20
operator and <BR>asking to place a collect call to 1-704-540-0139. The =
Business Conduct Line <BR>is a dedicated, toll-free phone line that is =
available to you 24 hours a <BR>day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. =
It is=20
operated by an external <BR>third-party vendor that has trained =
professionals=20
to take your calls, in <BR>confidence, and report your concerns to the =
Microsoft Director of Compliance <BR>for appropriate action. Your =
phone calls=20
to the Business Conduct Line may be <BR>made anonymously. =
"<BR><BR>'nuff=20
said?<BR><BR><BR>"Mike '/m'" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:mike@barkto.com">mike@barkto.com</A>> wrote in =
message <BR><A=20
=
href=3D"news:fb0191li9skdil3l444686d38bgr5un24f@4ax.com">news:fb0191li9sk=
dil3l444686d38bgr5un24f@4ax.com</A>...<BR>><BR>>=20
I think Joe Barr was just the first to see through Rich =
Shupak's<BR>>=20
diversionary tactics [among other thigns] in online=20
discussions.<BR>><BR>> What I wonder is if Microsoft's online =
persona go=20
through some manner of<BR>> training, because many of them seem to =
use the=20
same tactics over and<BR>> over.<BR>><BR>> =20
/m<shrug><BR>><BR>><BR>> On Sun, 22 May 2005 00:18:26 =
-0500,=20
"Randy" <@> wrote:<BR>><BR>>>Who whould have thought =
that Joe=20
Barr is right.<BR>>> "Rich" <@> wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:428eb385@w3.nls.net">news:428eb385@w3.nls.net</A>...<BR>>=
> =20
I find it hard to believe you can be such an idiot and not know it.=20
<BR>>> Read over your spin in this thread starting with your =
claims that=20
<BR>>> everyone except the itunes store is a loser. You =
are saying=20
more than <BR>>> the obvious that apple's investment in their =
itunes=20
store is a bet. I <BR>>> can't believe you have the =
audacity to=20
state in one sentence that you are <BR>>> voicing no opinion on =
the=20
itunes store both after doing so and before <BR>>> doing so =
again. =20
You are spinning so fast you can't=20
see.<BR>>><BR>>> As for your =
follow on=20
bullshit, there is no lock in and never was. <BR>>> Unlike =
apple,=20
Microsoft provides choice. Go ahead, continue your <BR>>>=20
dishonesty, and pretend you have none. Make sure you mention how =
you=20
<BR>>> have no choice everytime you mention your use any of the =
very=20
large set <BR>>> of non-Microsoft hardware, software, and =
services=20
Microsoft enables for <BR>>> =
Windows.<BR>>><BR>>> =20
Rich<BR>>><BR>>> "Mike '/m'" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:mike@barkto.com">mike@barkto.com</A>> wrote in =
message=20
<BR>>> <A=20
=
href=3D"news:mg5t819ipve721e41u345o5l2ebiv5p3ev@4ax.com">news:mg5t819ipve=
721e41u345o5l2ebiv5p3ev@4ax.com</A>...<BR>>> =20
> Keep spinning if that is what you need to live with=20
yourself.<BR>>><BR>>> I live with myself =
just=20
fine Rich. I find no need to let =
computers<BR>>> =20
affect my living situation. But I have to wonder why you=20
are<BR>>> =20
projecting?<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>> =20
> Do you really think the itunes store would sell the =
same if=20
apple <BR>>> did not lock in ipod users so that this was the =
only store=20
they can use?<BR>>><BR>>> I voice no =
opinion on=20
the iTunes store. I merely say that Apple's <BR>>>=20
focus<BR>>> is on iTunes and not necessarily=20
iPod. iPod is the means, iTunes =
is<BR>>> =20
the end. And Microsoft is the also-ran, perhaps not even=20
that.<BR>>> Probably more of "too late to the=20
party".<BR>>><BR>>> Whenever Microsoft =
feels the=20
need to trot out Mr. Gates to expound <BR>>>=20
upon<BR>>> some "new direction", I know that =
Microsft=20
has found themelves behind<BR>>> the market =
leader and=20
have belatedly realized that they need to try =
to<BR>>> =20
catch =
up.<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>> =20
>> If users are not locked in, why would they pick the itunes=20
store?<BR>>><BR>>> Coming from a =
Microsoft=20
employee, that is a very interesting=20
comment.<BR>>><BR>>> I mean, if the =
users were=20
not locked into Windows, would they have<BR>>> =
chosen=20
IE over Netscape? It seems that Microsoft execs' emails =
<BR>>>=20
entered<BR>>> as evidence in the anti-trist =
trials=20
have stated that Microsoft needed<BR>>> to =
leverage=20
the Windows monopoly in order to make IE the defacto <BR>>>=20
browser<BR>>> "of=20
choice".<BR>>><BR>>> If the users were =
not=20
locked in, would they choose WIndows Media in <BR>>>=20
the<BR>>> percentages that they currently=20
do?<BR>>><BR>>> /m<probably=20
=
not...><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>> &nb=
sp;=20
On Fri, 20 May 2005 18:56:30 -0700, "Rich" <@>=20
wrote:<BR>>><BR>>> > Keep =
spinning if that is what you need to live with=20
yourself.<BR>>> =
><BR>>> =20
> Do you really think the itunes store would sell the =
same if=20
apple <BR>>> did not lock in ipod users so that this was the =
only store=20
they can use?<BR>>> =
><BR>>> =20
> If users are not locked in, why would they pick the =
itunes=20
store?<BR>>> =
><BR>>> =20
>Rich<BR>>> =
><BR>>> =20
> "Mike '/m'" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:mike@barkto.com">mike@barkto.com</A>> wrote in =
message=20
<BR>>> <A=20
=
href=3D"news:s93t81dqsvf1bvef5vjpukf6n5ukvof7dp@4ax.com">news:s93t81dqsvf=
1bvef5vjpukf6n5ukvof7dp@4ax.com</A>...<BR>>> =20
><BR>>> > It must really suck for =
your=20
employer to be the loser in the online<BR>>> =20
> music race, eh Rich?<BR>>> =20
><BR>>> > Despite what you are =
trying to=20
spin me as saying, I am actually <BR>>>=20
saying<BR>>> > that Apple is betting =
on=20
iTunes (an/or its video successor), not <BR>>>=20
iPod.<BR>>> > I say no more or no =
less. =20
Despite what you try to spin.<BR>>> =20
><BR>>> > Give those rotator cuffs =
a rest=20
for a change, will ya?<BR>>> =20
><BR>>> > =20
/m<BR>>> ><BR>>> =20
><BR>>> ><BR>>> =20
><BR>>> ><BR>>> =20
> On Fri, 20 May 2005 17:15:01 -0700, "Rich" <@>=20
wrote:<BR>>> =
><BR>>> =20
> > If you weren't blinded by your agenda, =
mike, you=20
could see the <BR>>> obvious and how silly you=20
sound.<BR>>> > =20
><BR>>> > > Why =
will phones=20
win out, for the same reason phones are winning <BR>>> over many =
PDA=20
users? Why carry two devices when you can carry=20
one?<BR>>> > =20
><BR>>> > > Apple =
will=20
follow Microsoft and I believe real in getting their <BR>>> =
software=20
onto phones. There is a difference from the ipod. Unless =
apple=20
<BR>>> restricts their OEM licensees from offering their users =
multiple=20
choices, <BR>>> the phone manufacturers and carriers have no =
reason to=20
lock in their <BR>>> customers to the itunes store like apple=20
does.<BR>>> > =20
><BR>>> > =20
>Rich<BR>>> > =20
><BR>>> > > "Mike '/m'" =
<<A=20
href=3D"mailto:mike@barkto.com">mike@barkto.com</A>> wrote in =
message=20
<BR>>> <A=20
=
href=3D"news:55ns81lbitvndvtrbj4407ueh8f7cbm5bo@4ax.com">news:55ns81lbitv=
ndvtrbj4407ueh8f7cbm5bo@4ax.com</A>...<BR>>> =20
> ><BR>>> > > =
It's not=20
iPod that Apple is betting on, but iTunes (and its <BR>>>=20
video<BR>>> > > =
follow-up). =20
Apple is already putting iPod software on cell <BR>>> phones=20
to<BR>>> > > allow them to =
access=20
iTunes.<BR>>> > =20
><BR>>> > > Gates' =
comment was=20
more of a specious smokescreen than anything <BR>>>=20
else.<BR>>> > > Apple caught =
him=20
napping in this space, and now he has to look <BR>>> like=20
he<BR>>> > > was out in =
front all=20
along.<BR>>> > =20
><BR>>> > > =20
/m<BR>>> > =
><BR>>> =20
> ><BR>>> > > On =
Fri, 20=20
May 2005 14:01:23 +0100, Adam <BR>>> <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:mmmmm_beer_mmmm_donuts@moes">mmmmm_beer_mmmm_donuts@moes</=
A>><BR>>> =20
> > wrote:<BR>>> > =20
><BR>>> > > >Randy=20
wrote:<BR>>> > > =20
><BR>>> > > >> I =
just 1 GB=20
on my phone via miniSD-and I want =
MORE....<BR>>> =20
> > >><BR>>> =
> =20
> >> 500+ of AAC-encoded=20
songs-sweet!<BR>>> > > =20
>><BR>>> > > =20
><BR>>> > > >Ditto. I =
agree=20
with Gates that the Ipod won't last & that the <BR>>>=20
phones<BR>>> > > >will =
eat it's=20
lunch. I have a nokia 6230 which I got coz it has <BR>>> an=20
MP3<BR>>> > > >player =
& an fm=20
radio....<BR>>> > > =20
><BR>>> > > >A mondo =
bizarro=20
bit is that if you are listening to the radio <BR>>> or the=20
mp3<BR>>> > > >player =
&=20
someone calls you get the selected ringing tones....so <BR>>> if =
like<BR>>> > > >me you =
often set=20
your phone to silent for meetings etc & then <BR>>>=20
"forget"<BR>>> > > >to =
re-enable=20
the ringer....then you are left wondering what's <BR>>> going=20
on<BR>>> > > >coz the =
music/radio=20
just suddenly goes....silent....<BR>>> =
> =20
> ><BR>>> > > =20
><G><BR>>> > > =20
><BR>>> > > >I had a =
look at=20
the smart phones (Pocket pc, symbian etc) & was <BR>>>=20
very<BR>>> > > >impressed =
but @=20
the end of the day...I just wanted music + <BR>>> radio &=20
a<BR>>> > > >nice neat =
(small)=20
phone.<BR>>> > > =20
><BR>>> > > >I like =
the way=20
most of them now try wifi first for any net <BR>>> related=20
things.<BR>>> > > =20
><BR>>> > > >I reckon =
we're=20
2-3 years out from most people's "personal" <BR>>>=20
computer<BR>>> > > >being =
the=20
smartphone in their pocket.<BR>>> > =20
> ><BR>>> > > =20
>Adam<BR>> <BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0165_01C55EC1.7C2CD860--
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)
|