Tillbaka till svenska Fidonet
English   Information   Debug  
OS2BBS   0/787
OS2DOSBBS   0/580
OS2HW   0/42
OS2INET   0/37
OS2LAN   0/134
OS2PROG   0/36
OS2REXX   0/113
OS2USER-L   207
OS2   0/4786
OSDEBATE   2821/18996
PASCAL   0/490
PERL   0/457
PHP   0/45
POINTS   0/405
POLITICS   0/29554
POL_INC   0/14731
PSION   103
R20_ADMIN   1121
R20_AMATORRADIO   0/2
R20_BEST_OF_FIDONET   13
R20_CHAT   0/893
R20_DEPP   0/3
R20_DEV   399
R20_ECHO2   1379
R20_ECHOPRES   0/35
R20_ESTAT   0/719
R20_FIDONETPROG...
...RAM.MYPOINT
  0/2
R20_FIDONETPROGRAM   0/22
R20_FIDONET   0/248
R20_FILEFIND   0/24
R20_FILEFOUND   0/22
R20_HIFI   0/3
R20_INFO2   3205
R20_INTERNET   0/12940
R20_INTRESSE   0/60
R20_INTR_KOM   0/99
R20_KANDIDAT.CHAT   42
R20_KANDIDAT   28
R20_KOM_DEV   112
R20_KONTROLL   0/13258
R20_KORSET   0/18
R20_LOKALTRAFIK   0/24
R20_MODERATOR   0/1852
R20_NC   76
R20_NET200   245
R20_NETWORK.OTH...
...ERNETS
  0/13
R20_OPERATIVSYS...
...TEM.LINUX
  0/44
R20_PROGRAMVAROR   0/1
R20_REC2NEC   534
R20_SFOSM   0/340
R20_SF   0/108
R20_SPRAK.ENGLISH   0/1
R20_SQUISH   107
R20_TEST   2
R20_WORST_OF_FIDONET   12
RAR   0/9
RA_MULTI   106
RA_UTIL   0/162
REGCON.EUR   0/2056
REGCON   0/13
SCIENCE   0/1206
SF   0/239
SHAREWARE_SUPPORT   0/5146
SHAREWRE   0/14
SIMPSONS   0/169
STATS_OLD1   0/2539.065
STATS_OLD2   0/2530
STATS_OLD3   0/2395.095
STATS_OLD4   0/1692.25
SURVIVOR   0/495
SYSOPS_CORNER   0/3
SYSOP   0/84
TAGLINES   0/112
TEAMOS2   0/4530
TECH   0/2617
TEST.444   0/105
TRAPDOOR   0/19
TREK   0/755
TUB   0/290
UFO   0/40
UNIX   0/1316
USA_EURLINK   0/102
USR_MODEMS   0/1
VATICAN   0/2740
VIETNAM_VETS   0/14
VIRUS   0/378
VIRUS_INFO   0/201
VISUAL_BASIC   0/473
WHITEHOUSE   0/5187
WIN2000   0/101
WIN32   0/30
WIN95   0/4288
WIN95_OLD1   0/70272
WINDOWS   0/1517
WWB_SYSOP   0/419
WWB_TECH   0/810
ZCC-PUBLIC   0/1
ZEC   4

 
4DOS   0/134
ABORTION   0/7
ALASKA_CHAT   0/506
ALLFIX_FILE   0/1313
ALLFIX_FILE_OLD1   0/7997
ALT_DOS   0/152
AMATEUR_RADIO   0/1039
AMIGASALE   0/14
AMIGA   0/331
AMIGA_INT   0/1
AMIGA_PROG   0/20
AMIGA_SYSOP   0/26
ANIME   0/15
ARGUS   0/924
ASCII_ART   0/340
ASIAN_LINK   0/651
ASTRONOMY   0/417
AUDIO   0/92
AUTOMOBILE_RACING   0/105
BABYLON5   0/17862
BAG   135
BATPOWER   0/361
BBBS.ENGLISH   0/382
BBSLAW   0/109
BBS_ADS   4789/5290
BBS_INTERNET   0/507
BIBLE   0/3563
BINKD   0/1119
BINKLEY   0/215
BLUEWAVE   0/2173
CABLE_MODEMS   0/25
CBM   0/46
CDRECORD   0/66
CDROM   0/20
CLASSIC_COMPUTER   0/378
COMICS   0/15
CONSPRCY   0/899
COOKING   32677
COOKING_OLD1   0/24719
COOKING_OLD2   0/40862
COOKING_OLD3   0/37489
COOKING_OLD4   0/35496
COOKING_OLD5   9370
C_ECHO   0/189
C_PLUSPLUS   0/31
DIRTY_DOZEN   0/201
DOORGAMES   0/2053
DOS_INTERNET   0/196
duplikat   6002
ECHOLIST   0/18295
EC_SUPPORT   0/318
ELECTRONICS   0/359
ELEKTRONIK.GER   1534
ENET.LINGUISTIC   0/13
ENET.POLITICS   0/4
ENET.SOFT   0/11701
ENET.SYSOP   33888
ENET.TALKS   0/32
ENGLISH_TUTOR   0/2000
EVOLUTION   0/1335
FDECHO   0/217
FDN_ANNOUNCE   0/7068
FIDONEWS   24094
FIDONEWS_OLD1   0/49742
FIDONEWS_OLD2   0/35949
FIDONEWS_OLD3   0/30874
FIDONEWS_OLD4   0/37224
FIDO_SYSOP   12852
FIDO_UTIL   0/180
FILEFIND   0/209
FILEGATE   0/212
FILM   0/18
FNEWS_PUBLISH   4393
FN_SYSOP   41678
FN_SYSOP_OLD1   71952
FTP_FIDO   0/2
FTSC_PUBLIC   0/13598
FUNNY   0/4886
GENEALOGY.EUR   0/71
GET_INFO   105
GOLDED   0/408
HAM   0/16069
HOLYSMOKE   0/6791
HOT_SITES   0/1
HTMLEDIT   0/71
HUB203   466
HUB_100   264
HUB_400   39
HUMOR   0/29
IC   0/2851
INTERNET   0/424
INTERUSER   0/3
IP_CONNECT   719
JAMNNTPD   0/233
JAMTLAND   0/47
KATTY_KORNER   0/41
LAN   0/16
LINUX-USER   0/19
LINUXHELP   0/1155
LINUX   0/22090
LINUX_BBS   0/957
mail   18.68
mail_fore_ok   249
MENSA   0/341
MODERATOR   0/102
MONTE   0/992
MOSCOW_OKLAHOMA   0/1245
MUFFIN   0/783
MUSIC   0/321
N203_STAT   924
N203_SYSCHAT   313
NET203   321
NET204   69
NET_DEV   0/10
NORD.ADMIN   0/101
NORD.CHAT   0/2572
NORD.FIDONET   189
NORD.HARDWARE   0/28
NORD.KULTUR   0/114
NORD.PROG   0/32
NORD.SOFTWARE   0/88
NORD.TEKNIK   0/58
NORD   0/453
OCCULT_CHAT   0/93
Möte OSDEBATE, 18996 texter
 lista första sista föregående nästa
Text 4431, 293 rader
Skriven 2005-05-25 20:13:14 av Rich (1:379/45)
   Kommentar till text 4422 av RobertB. (1:379/45)
Ärende: Re: Music players and phones
====================================
From: "Rich" <@>

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0351_01C56166.2F573510
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

   In the Microsoft case apple products were excluded as the definition =
of the relevant market was intentionally narrowed from what you might =
consider the PC market to among other restrictions include only x86 =
processors based systems.  Right or wrong, such restrictions appear = "legal"
even though they exclude what you view as alternatives.

Rich

  "RobertB." <rb28@nyu.edu> wrote in message =
news:rb28-F45C27.18395025052005@w3.nls.net...
  I'm not sure if this is legally correct. However, I would add that =
Apple=20
  plays within the "PC" universe and competes with other hardware and=20
  software manufacturers. They now have about 3.5% of that market, not=20
  enough for a monopoly I would say. Sure, if you want to buy OS X, you=20
  have to buy it from Apple, but who says you have to buy OS X? You also =

  have to buy Photoshop from Adobe.=20



  In article <42935e90@w3.nls.net>, "Rich" <@> wrote:

  >    I think it only matters within the scope of the market and not =
the size of=20
  >    the defined market. The size of the market may matter in =
determining who=20
  >    cares not whether "monopoly power" exists.  Consider someone that =
needs or=20
  >    wants macos, they have only one choice of a provider for the =
computer=20
  >    system.  It may not matter to you but it should matter to that =
person.
  >=20
  >    In regard to your last question, I think not at all.
  >=20
  > Rich
  >=20
  >   "RobertB." <rb28@nyu.edu> wrote in message=20
  >   news:rb28-0EEEDD.11410924052005@w3.nls.net...
  >   That may be so, but there is an also an economic factor that is =
taken=20
  >   into consideration. A company that monopolizes an industry with =
$100K of=20
  >   sales per year would hardly be a candidate for monopoly status. =
Also,=20
  >   unless I'm mistaken, doesn't a monopoly imply a considerable =
amount of=20
  >   vertical integration? You not only own the coal fields, you own =
the=20
  >   railroad that transports the coal and the tracks the trains run =
on.=20
  >=20
  >   r.
  >=20
  >   In article <42928de5@w3.nls.net>, "Rich" <@> wrote:
  >=20
  >   >    Not true for multiple reasons.  One is that percentages don't =
matter. =20
  >   >    Another is that you can play number games and define the =
market=20
  >   >    however=20
  >   >    you wish.  During the Microsoft trial the market was defined =
narrowly=20
  >   >    to=20
  >   >    include only single user computers with a video display, =
keyboard, and=20
  >   >    Intel x86 processor so as to exclude computer from apple, =
sun, PDAs,=20
  >   >    servers, and pretty much anything that does not run Windows.  =
Do the=20
  >   >    same=20
  >   >    here and you see that apple has 100% of the the market for =
computers=20
  >   >    that=20
  >   >    run macos software. =20
  >   >=20
  >   > Rich
  >   >=20
  >   >   "RobertB." <rb28@nyu.edu> wrote in message=20
  >   >   news:rb28-8DAD7D.16182223052005@w3.nls.net...
  >   >   Apple owns only 3+% of the market for PCs. They can't be a =
monopoly by=20
  >   >   definition.=20
  >   >=20
  >   >=20
  >   >   In article <42909834$1@w3.nls.net>, "Geo" <georger@nls.net> =
wrote:
  >   >=20
  >   >   > "Mike '/m'" <mike@barkto.com> wrote in message
  >   >   > news:ib119159n04nd7q414l4g84l09o643gla6@4ax.com...
  >   >   >=20
  >   >   > > Apple is definitely something with regard to OS/X, but I =
don't=20
  >   >   > > think
  >   >   > > monopoly is the concept.
  >   >   >=20
  >   >   > If you write mac software it's a monopoly, if you are a =
customer then=20
  >   >   > it's
  >   >   > probably just really really proprietary.
  >   >   >=20
  >   >   > Before you argue with the term monopoly, remember the court =
case=20
  >   >   > where=20
  >   >   > apple
  >   >   > sued microsoft for being a lookalike.. They even think like =
a=20
  >   >   > monopoly.
  >   >   >=20
  >   >   > Geo.
  >   >   >=20
  >   >   >
------=_NextPart_000_0351_01C56166.2F573510
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2627" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp; In the Microsoft case =
apple products=20
were excluded as the definition of the relevant market was intentionally =

narrowed from what you might consider the PC market to among other =
restrictions=20
include only x86 processors based systems.&nbsp; Right or wrong, such=20
restrictions appear "legal" even though they exclude what you view as=20
alternatives.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rich</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV>"RobertB." &lt;<A =
href=3D"mailto:rb28@nyu.edu">rb28@nyu.edu</A>&gt; wrote=20
  in message <A=20
  =
href=3D"news:rb28-F45C27.18395025052005@w3.nls.net">news:rb28-F45C27.1839=
5025052005@w3.nls.net</A>...</DIV>I'm=20
  not sure if this is legally correct. However, I would add that Apple =
<BR>plays=20
  within the "PC" universe and competes with other hardware and =
<BR>software=20
  manufacturers. They now have about 3.5% of that market, not <BR>enough =
for a=20
  monopoly I would say. Sure, if you want to buy OS X, you <BR>have to =
buy it=20
  from Apple, but who says you have to buy OS X? You also <BR>have to =
buy=20
  Photoshop from Adobe. <BR><BR><BR><BR>In article &lt;<A=20
  href=3D"mailto:42935e90@w3.nls.net">42935e90@w3.nls.net</A>&gt;, =
"Rich"=20
  &lt;@&gt; wrote:<BR><BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; I think it only matters =
within=20
  the scope of the market and not the size of <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
the=20
  defined market. The size of the market may matter in determining who=20
  <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; cares not whether "monopoly power" =
exists.&nbsp;=20
  Consider someone that needs or <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; wants macos, =
they=20
  have only one choice of a provider for the computer =
<BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
  system.&nbsp; It may not matter to you but it should matter to that=20
  person.<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; In regard to your last =
question, I=20
  think not at all.<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Rich<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
  "RobertB." &lt;<A href=3D"mailto:rb28@nyu.edu">rb28@nyu.edu</A>&gt; =
wrote in=20
  message <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; <A=20
  =
href=3D"news:rb28-0EEEDD.11410924052005@w3.nls.net">news:rb28-0EEEDD.1141=
0924052005@w3.nls.net</A>...<BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
  That may be so, but there is an also an economic factor that is taken=20
  <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; into consideration. A company that monopolizes an =

  industry with $100K of <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; sales per year would =
hardly be a=20
  candidate for monopoly status. Also, <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; unless I'm =
mistaken,=20
  doesn't a monopoly imply a considerable amount of <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; =

  vertical integration? You not only own the coal fields, you own the=20
  <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; railroad that transports the coal and the tracks =
the=20
  trains run on. <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; r.<BR>&gt; =
<BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
  In article &lt;<A=20
  href=3D"mailto:42928de5@w3.nls.net">42928de5@w3.nls.net</A>&gt;, =
"Rich"=20
  &lt;@&gt; wrote:<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
Not true=20
  for multiple reasons.&nbsp; One is that percentages don't =
matter.&nbsp;=20
  <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Another is that you can =
play=20
  number games and define the market <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
  however <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; you wish.&nbsp; =
During the=20
  Microsoft trial the market was defined narrowly <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
  &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; to <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
include=20
  only single user computers with a video display, keyboard, and=20
  <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Intel x86 processor so as =
to=20
  exclude computer from apple, sun, PDAs, <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
  &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; servers, and pretty much anything that does not =
run=20
  Windows.&nbsp; Do the <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; same =

  <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; here and you see that =
apple has=20
  100% of the the market for computers <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
  &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; that <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; run=20
  macos software.&nbsp; <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
&gt;=20
  Rich<BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
"RobertB."=20
  &lt;<A href=3D"mailto:rb28@nyu.edu">rb28@nyu.edu</A>&gt; wrote in =
message=20
  <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; <A=20
  =
href=3D"news:rb28-8DAD7D.16182223052005@w3.nls.net">news:rb28-8DAD7D.1618=
2223052005@w3.nls.net</A>...<BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
  &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; Apple owns only 3+% of the market for PCs. They can't =
be a=20
  monopoly by <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; definition.=20
  <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; =
<BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
  &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; In article &lt;<A=20
  href=3D"mailto:42909834$1@w3.nls.net">42909834$1@w3.nls.net</A>&gt;, =
"Geo"=20
  &lt;<A href=3D"mailto:georger@nls.net">georger@nls.net</A>&gt;=20
  wrote:<BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
&gt;=20
  "Mike '/m'" &lt;<A =
href=3D"mailto:mike@barkto.com">mike@barkto.com</A>&gt; wrote=20
  in message<BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; <A=20
  =
href=3D"news:ib119159n04nd7q414l4g84l09o643gla6@4ax.com">news:ib119159n04=
nd7q414l4g84l09o643gla6@4ax.com</A>...<BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
  &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; &gt; =
Apple is=20
  definitely something with regard to OS/X, but I don't =
<BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
  &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; &gt; think<BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
&gt;=20
  &gt; monopoly is the concept.<BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
&gt;=20
  <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; If you write mac software =
it's a=20
  monopoly, if you are a customer then <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
  &gt; it's<BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; probably just =
really=20
  really proprietary.<BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;=20
  <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; Before you argue with the =
term=20
  monopoly, remember the court case <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;=20
  where <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; =
apple<BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
  &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; sued microsoft for being a lookalike.. They even =
think=20
  like a <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;=20
  monopoly.<BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; =
<BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
  &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; Geo.<BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;=20
  <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0351_01C56166.2F573510--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
 * Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)