Text 6104, 221 rader
Skriven 2005-07-16 09:57:02 av Rich (1:379/45)
Kommentar till text 6095 av Geo (1:379/45)
Ärende: Re: eeye's irresponsible self-serving behavior
======================================================
From: "Rich" <@>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0138_01C589EC.B754EAD0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I understand you want to try to associate eeye with Einstein and =
relativity. As silly as this is I'm being to wonder if you believe this =
garbage instead of just using it to create a diversion. In the future = you
should stay away from Einstein and instead list the wonderful good = things
that have actually resulted because we all know the damage they = have caused.
In any case it is good to know that you acknowledge the great harm =
that resulted from the instructions provided by eeye.
Rich
"Geo" <georger@nls.net> wrote in message news:42d9365f@w3.nls.net...
I believe the detailed knowledge of the exploits can be used for bad =
as well as good intentions, same as relativity theory has been used for = both.
There is nothing religious in this, its common sense that people = will use
knowledge to attain their goals and since there are more good = people than bad
people then more good will result.
Geo.
"Rich" <@> wrote in message news:42d83142$1@w3.nls.net...
Do you not believe that great harm resulted from the instructions =
provided by eeye? Remember, we are talking about eeye and their = behavior.
Don't try to change this back to some religious debate again. =
I have no interest in debating religion or with people that use =
religion as the basis for harming others.
Rich
"Geo" <georger@nls.net> wrote in message =
news:42d82e68@w3.nls.net...
I'm taking issue with your "great harm" comment, ie if information =
causes great harm it should be surpressed apparently regardless of the =
benefits of that information. But it would appear you can't defend that =
position.
Geo.
"Rich" <@> wrote in message news:42d81e88$1@w3.nls.net...
Now you switch from religion to nonsense. Did you trim away =
your earlier comments to make your diversion less obvious?
Rich
"Geo" <georger@nls.net> wrote in message =
news:42d81ccd$1@w3.nls.net...
Einstein's theory of relativity has done great harm by that =
line of reasoning, should it have been suppressed? Should that knowledge = have
been kept secret so that only club members had access to it?
Geo.
"Rich" <@> wrote in message news:42d72e5c@w3.nls.net...
First off, what they say and what they do need not match. =
I don't care what they say or what excuses they make. My opinion of =
them is based on what they do. What they do is cause great harm to = others
for their own financial gain. If you want to argue religion go = find yourself
someone that cares about silly religious debates. A great = deal of harm has
been done in the name of religion and I find religious = justifications
inexcusable.
Rich
------=_NextPart_000_0138_01C589EC.B754EAD0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2668" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> I understand you want to =
try to=20
associate eeye with Einstein and relativity. As silly as this is = I'm
being=20
to wonder if you believe this garbage instead of just using it to create = a=20
diversion. In the future you should stay away from Einstein and =
instead=20
list the wonderful good things that have actually resulted because we = all
know=20
the damage they have caused.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> In any case it is good to =
know that=20
you acknowledge the great harm that resulted from the instructions = provided
by=20
eeye.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rich</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Geo" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:georger@nls.net">georger@nls.net</A>> wrote=20
in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:42d9365f@w3.nls.net">news:42d9365f@w3.nls.net</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I believe the detailed knowledge of =
the exploits=20
can be used for bad as well as good intentions, same as relativity =
theory has=20
been used for both. There is nothing religious in this, its common =
sense that=20
people will use knowledge to attain their goals and since there are =
more good=20
people than bad people then more good will result.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Geo.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Rich" <@> wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:42d83142$1@w3.nls.net">news:42d83142$1@w3.nls.net</A>...</DI=
V>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> Do you not believe =
that great harm=20
resulted from the instructions provided by eeye? Remember, we =
are=20
talking about eeye and their behavior. Don't try to change =
this back=20
to some religious debate again. I have no interest in debating =
religion or with people that use religion as the basis for harming=20
others.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rich</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Geo" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:georger@nls.net">georger@nls.net</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:42d82e68@w3.nls.net">news:42d82e68@w3.nls.net</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'm taking issue with your "great =
harm"=20
comment, ie if information causes great harm it should be =
surpressed=20
apparently regardless of the benefits of that information. But it =
would=20
appear you can't defend that position.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Geo.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Rich" <@> wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:42d81e88$1@w3.nls.net">news:42d81e88$1@w3.nls.net</A>...</DI=
V>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> Now you switch =
from religion=20
to nonsense. Did you trim away your earlier comments to =
make your=20
diversion less obvious?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rich</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: =
5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Geo" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:georger@nls.net">georger@nls.net</A>> wrote =
in message=20
<A=20
=
href=3D"news:42d81ccd$1@w3.nls.net">news:42d81ccd$1@w3.nls.net</A>...</DI=
V>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Einstein's theory of =
relativity has done=20
great harm by that line of reasoning, should it have been =
suppressed?=20
Should that knowledge have been kept secret so that only club =
members=20
had access to it?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Geo.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: =
5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Rich" <@> wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:42d72e5c@w3.nls.net">news:42d72e5c@w3.nls.net</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> First off, =
what they say=20
and what they do need not match. I don't care what =
they say or=20
what excuses they make. My opinion of them is based on =
what=20
they do. What they do is cause great harm to =
others for=20
their own financial gain. If you want to argue =
religion go=20
find yourself someone that cares about silly religious=20
debates. A great deal of harm has been done in the =
name of=20
religion and I find religious justifications=20
inexcusable.</FONT></DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>
<DIV><BR>Rich</DIV>
=
<DIV></FONT> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUO=
TE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0138_01C589EC.B754EAD0--
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)
|