Text 3228, 76 rader
Skriven 2004-10-10 19:31:39 av John Hull (1:379/1.99)
   Kommentar till text 3218 av THURSTON ACKERMAN (1:123/140)
Ärende: Re: Heh
===============
10 Oct 04 16:19, THURSTON ACKERMAN wrote to ED CONNELL:

 EC>>Hey, THURSTON.

 EC>> EC>> EC>> TA> I did appreciate being behind a Bush; but the Shrub 
 EC>> EC>> EC>> isn't enough
 EC>> EC>> EC>> TA> to protect either of us in any blow, hard or no.

 EC>> EC>> EC>> The terrorists been terrorizing you?

 EC>> EC>> TA> Nothing much terrorizee me at the age of 84; but my 
 EC>> EC>> TA> grandson is getting
 EC>> EC>> TA> married in a couple weeks so I have hopes for possible
 EC>> EC>> greatgrandkids I
 EC>> EC>> TA> worry for.

 EC>> EC>> You think your descendants will be safer if Kerry is elected? 
 EC>> EC>>  Why?

 EC>> TA> Because unlike Democrat Presidents in the previous century, 
 EC>> TA> Kerry is less likely to go off on off shore wars.

 EC>>Hmmm.  It wasn't that long ago that Kerry was saying that we needed 
 EC>>to take Saddam out because he had weapons of mass destruction.  You 
 EC>>must know something the rest of us don't.

 TA> That was back when they all were relying on bad WMD information 
 TA> that was fed to them and they didn't check it out for validity. Present
 TA> contrary information has everyone reverseing positions. Kerry has
 TA> said he would work with the europeons and UN again; so no military
 TA> actions will occur in the middle-east and/or africa, and/or Korea, 
 TA> etc..

God, you people are incredible!  Let's revisit the facts and see if what you
say holds up.

1.  The intelligence used by the US and Britain, and as far as we were told,
every other western ally, indicated that Saddam still had WMD's.  That fact is
not in dispute.  Even John Kerry made statements saying that was the case at
the time.

2.  WMD's were not the PRIMARY reason we went after Iraq and Saddam.  Bush has
said that more times than I can count.  Iraq was a safe haven and enabler of
terrorism and had long established ties with al Queda.  That has also been
established beyond dispute.

3.  NOW we know that Saddam was scamming us, and that he didn't have WMD's. 
But we also know he had no intention of giving up trying to obtain them AGAIN
once the world wasn't watching anymore.

4.  We now know that both France and Russia and to some extent Germany were
dealing with Saddam under the table through the UN Oil for Food program.  They
turned a blind eye to his activities to the tune of $80 BILLION!  

Now, what has Kerry proposed?  Working with the corrupt UN and even more
corrupt so-called allies?  Getting involved only after passing some "global
test" to see if our agenda is legitimate?  

Man, those "allies" have to be laughing themselves into unconsciousness over
Kerry.  You think the French are arrogant and intransigent now?  Wait till
Kerry is president and tries to get them on board for anything.  Kerry is an
inexperienced puppy trying to play with the big dogs in a junkyard where you
only get one chance, and then the pack takes you out.

Today I heard on the news that Osama bin Laden was last seen alive in Iran. 
Looks like Kerry will have to deal with a country that is even more of a
terrorist facilitator than Iraq.  But, as long as they just sit there biding
their time, Kerry won't do a damn thing.  He's said as much.

John 

America:  First, Last, and Always!
Go to www.madgorilla.us for all your Domain Name Services at the lowest rates.

--- Msged/386 TE 05
 * Origin:  (1:379/1.99)