Text 7682, 76 rader
Skriven 2005-01-19 11:42:56 av John Hull (1:379/1.99)
   Kommentar till text 7681 av Darryl Perry (1:106/324)
Ärende: Believing
=================
19 Jan 05 09:31, Darryl Perry wrote to John Hull:

 DP> On 01-19-05, John Hull said...

 JH>> Darryl Perry -> John Hull wrote:
 JH>>  DP> On 01-18-05, John Hull said...
 JH>> 
 JH>>  JH>> Darryl Perry -> VERN HUMPHREY wrote:
 JH>>  DP>>> On 01-18-05, VERN HUMPHREY said...
 JH>> 
 JH>>  EC>>>>>>>>> Yes, I hear that Bill Moyers really lost it the other
 JH>>  DP>>> day an
 JH>>  EC>>>>>>> let'em
 JH>>  EC>>>>>>>>> have it.  Called Hannity political porn. <g>
 JH>> 
 JH>>  VH>>>>>>>> Because of telling the naked truth? :-)
 JH>> 
 JH>>  EC>>>>>>> Heh heh - another good one.  You are just full of it - 
 JH>>  EC>>>>>>> uh -
 JH>>  DP>>> I mea
 JH>>  EC>>>>>>> full of them this evening. <g>
 JH>> 
 JH>>  VH>>>>>> I can see Bill now, spewing spit and accusing Hannity of 
 JH>>  VH>>>>>> "Full frontal truth in prime time, where little children 
 JH>>  VH>>>>>> can see
 JH>>  DP>>> it." :-)
 JH>> 
 JH>>  EC>>>>> That's a good joke, but not far from the truth.
 JH>> 
 JH>>  VH>>>> The liberal media really hate Fox -- and make no bones 
 JH>>  VH>>>> about
 JH>>  DP> it.  Of
 JH>>  VH>>>> course, this is the same liberal media who published 
 JH>>  VH>>>> forgeries
 JH>>  DP> about
 JH>>  DP>>> and
 JH>>  VH>>>> then said, "We hate him, so it has to be true."
 JH>> 
 JH>>  DP>>> You are a liar.  They never said that.
 JH>> 
 JH>>  JH>> You've never heard of paraphrasing?  Because they most 
 JH>>  JH>> certainly did
 JH>>  DP> say t
 JH>>  JH>> while the documents might be forged, the content was true, 
 JH>>  JH>> and Dan
 JH>>  DP> Rather
 JH>>  JH>> this day still maintains that is the case.
 JH>> 
 JH>>  DP> Oh well, we can call it paraphrasing now, but it's not lying? 
 JH>>  DP>  I gues
 JH>> you
 JH>>  DP> are right.  Bush is *not* a liar.  He's a PARAPHRASER!!!
 JH>> 
 JH>> But you're still an idiot if you believe Dan Rather and CBS.

 DP> It's not about whether or not I believe Dan Rather or CBS.  It's 
 DP> about
 DP> whether or not I believe YOU.  You are the one that is lying.

I am not the only one here who said he was right, but you conveniently choose
to ignore THAT fact so you can accuse me of being a liar.  You can't have it
both ways, slick.  Bush is not a liar, either.  Apparently you're too stupid to
understand the difference - not a subtle difference either - between saying
something in error based on data provided to you by several other that was
incorrect, and saying something is true when you know beyond a doubt that its
false.  The words "truth" and "integrity" are not part of the liberal lexicon. 
But then, you liberals wouldn't say "shit" if you had a mouthful of it, so it
shouldn't surprise anyone here when you can't tell the truth.

John 

America:  First, Last, and Always!
Go to www.madgorilla.us for all your Domain Name Services at the lowest rates.

--- Msged/386 TE 05
 * Origin: We are the Watchmen of our own Liberty! (1:379/1.99)