Text 24246, 83 rader
Skriven 2006-01-29 11:51:26 av Roy Witt (1:1/22)
  Kommentar till text 24158 av Michiel van der Vlist (2:280/5555)
Ärende: Editor's censorship
===========================
29 Jan 06 14:58, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Roy Witt:


 >>>>>> Now that's the stupidest statement you've made so far. The law
 >>>>>> there to stop the adult from molesting children.

 MvdV>>>>> A fourteen year old is not a child any more.

 >>>> I notice that to be the case in your morally deficient
 >>>> society. Fourteen year olds are still children in this country.

 MvdV>>> Then your country is out of touch with 21th century reality.

 >> 21st. In fact, it's as progressive as any other 1st class
 >> country in the world. Hmmm, there are no others, how odd.

 MvdV> Progressive?! Ha, that's a good one, you nearly ruined my keyboard.

Progressive...it has nothing to do with your keyboard.

 MvdV>>> Like it or not, a substantial fraction, if not the majority of
 MvdV>>> the fourteen year old females in this world is not a virgin any
 MvdV>>> more.

 >> That doesn't mean that they had intercourse with an adult,

 MvdV> It does nt mean that they did NOT have intercourse with an adult
 MvdV> either.

It means that the likelyhood of them having sex with an adult is much less
than them having sex with another teen.

 MvdV> Point is that if afourteen year old femeale decides she is
 MvdV> going to have sex with the male of her choice, there is not much
 MvdV> anyone can do to stopt it.

That's right, unless the male of her choice is aware that he'd be breaking
the law in doing so. That's why there's a law about adults not having sex
with minors, one is supposedly capable of thinking logically and being
able to predict the consequences of that act, under the law. A teenager
most likely wouldn't have that capability. Especially a rebellious one.

 MvdV> and if the male of her choice is five or ten years older than
 MvdV> herself, then no law is going to stop her .

But it might stop a thinking adult from breaking the law.

 >> There's a big difference in havingn sex between teens and
 >> teens having sex with adults.

 MvdV> Really? So what IS the difference?

Read what I said again and then take back the following brash statement of
illogical thinking.

 MvdV> Does the hymen stay intact when the male is under sixteen? Does the
 MvdV> female not get pregnant or are teenagers immune for diseases when
 MvdV> they have unprotected sex with another teenager?

 >> The adult should be able to constrain himself,

 MvdV> So what happens when the adult turns her down? She will just find
 MvdV> another adult with less respect for the law.

You mean one like Menno Blom, who has no power to constrain himself.

 MvdV> If the girl wants an adult, she will have an adult. No law can stop
 MvdV> that.

The law will stop the adult, because they're supposedly capable of making
a smart choice. Unless of course, they have the low morals of a Menno
Blom.

 MvdV> Anyone not seeing that is out of touch with 21st century reality.

Anyone not seeing what has been pointed out to you time and time again,
isn't in touch with the reality of the 20th century, let alone the 21st
century.


Roy
--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000
 * Origin: Hacienda de Rio de Guadalupe * South * Texas, USA * (1:1/22)