Text 28327, 250 rader
Skriven 2006-04-26 13:54:43 av Roy Witt (1:1/22)
  Kommentar till text 28278 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
Ärende: Canadian "Skills"
=========================
25 Apr 06 21:32, Björn Forsström wrote to Roy Witt:


 RW>>>> military during WW2...
 BF>>> You very well know I wasn't and neither were you.

 RW>> Don't be so sure about that. I could be a reincarnation of someone
 RW>> who invaded Poland in 1939...

 BF> You certainly have the same stupid ideas, to know best and rule the
 BF> world. And look what happend to him, go and do the same.

Just for your education, and I assume that in using the word 'you', you
meant the USA and not me personally (if you did mean me, then I will
expect an aplogy for your insinuations).

The USA doesn't go about rounding up jews and other "undesirable" people
and excuting them. We (the USA) actually free everyone, save for those who
would kill innocent AND unarmed men, women and children.

Since being stupid is your forte' and these attempts to compare the USA
with your countrys former collaberation with the Nazi' is just more of
your stupid thinking. Get off that fucking park bench, drink a gallon of
coffee and sober up, asshole!

 BF>>> Watching what you and Frank S write
 RW>> Should give you a real education.
 BF> The only thing I've learned from you is to behave like a real
 BF> asshole.

Yes, you do make an attempt, but even at that, you're a miserable
failure...you're too stupid to live, Bjorn, go blow your brains out before
you hurt an innocent bystander.

 BF>>>  is like watching AFV or ADC or even Friends, Jerry Springer,
 BF>>> Suddenly Susan or whatever on TV. You two really make the world
 BF>>> realize that those series aren't fiction. You two have really
 BF>>> proven that.
 RW>> Anyone who would make up a stupid conclusion from watching those
 RW>> programs really needs to find something else to do. They're funny,
 RW>> but that's the least amount of education about America as you'll
 RW>> find.
 BF> Apart from you, they are at least funny.

But not nearly as funny as you, who truely believes that those shows are
what Americans are like.

 BF>>> So, being among the Big Dogs I have to use words like dumass,
 BF>>> asshole, cocksucker and motherfucker like you do?
 RW>> No, you just have to stop whining. Maybe you should take your fine
 RW>> whiskey and your park bench and go somewhere else; where you won't
 RW>> make a fool of yourself.
 BF> Now you're again telling me not to do as you do but as you say.

In your case, you'd be better off doing as I say, because you're not adept
at doing as I do.

 BF>>>>>  Don't do what I tell you to do, do as I do, eh...? ...and
 BF>>>>> then you whine..... Strange.
 RW>>>> I'm not the one who's whining about it...you are.
 BF>>> Right!
 RW>> About time you got that straight.
 BF> I didn't expect you to understand that.

And sarcasm went flying right over your bald head...way over it.

 BF>>> That's our black history and nothing I can do to change it just as
 BF>>> it is with some parts of your own black history so why keep it up?
 RW>> Black history? LOL!
 BF> See above.

Black history was last January...the blacks here call it 'Black History
Month'...

 BF>>>>> All I know is that I didn't have anything to do with it. But
 BF>>>>> since the 50's we have been colaborating with USA and then that
 BF>>>>> must be as bad,
 RW>>>> Only if you're guilty of killing a few million innocent Jews.
 BF>>> Or 50 000 Iraquis.
 RW>> Who killed them? Certainly not American or coolition troops...look
 RW>> at their towels wrapped around their heads the next time they show
 RW>> them on TV...
 BF> Did they commit suicide?

This reply only proves that you dont know what the fuck you're talking
about.

 BF>>>>> especially since we are neutral.
 RW>>>> You can't be a collaborator and be neutral all at the same time.
 BF>>> Our forces train with NATO forces but not with WP forces. What does
 BF>>> that tell you?
 RW>> Your troops are chickenshits.
 BF> Trained by chickens?

Trained by Felten and Forsstrom, yes.

 BF>>>>> Remember N379P? And now even more countries have agreed to
 BF>>>>> "helping" CIA and USA.
 RW>>>> Do you still believe in that hoax? My my, you sure are easily
 RW>>>> impressed.
 BF>>> Even Frank S believe it now so that makes you even dumber then he
 BF>>> is.
 RW>> Oh? I don't recall Frank stating that he believes it. I'm sure
 RW>> that's just another assumption on your part.

 BF> Now is the time for him to speak up and show that he's the man he
 BF> claims to be.

He has been, you're just not smart enough to understand him.

 BF> If he doesn't he will show that he's the lying SOB we say he is and
 BF> if he speak up, it will show what a moron you are.

And for sure, the moron that you've always been.

 BF> Tough choice eh..... Wonder what it will be but this time will be the
 BF> the first he doesn't answer I guess.

There's no reason to answer to idiots who haven't a clue.

 BF>>> A very coloured view and as you said, second hand.
 RW>> You're getting it second hand. He got it first hand from his
 RW>> brother, who was there.
 BF> And all those who have appeared in documentaries on TV are lying?

If they're uros, they're probably lying through their teeth. Or don't know
any better.

 BF>>> Since N379P is true and confirmed by several countries, start by
 BF>>> believing that and I can start to believe what you say.
 RW>> Sorry, I can't believe a bunch of pikers...and I certainly don't
 RW>> care if you're too dumb to realize you've been duped by those
 RW>> pikers.
 BF> Let's just see what your buddy says about the above, shall we?

Afraid to admit you're full of shit?

 BF>>> As USA have filled yours by saying that N379P never existed?
 RW>> The facts bear me out. I find none to support what you're saying.
 RW>> Does that make you a liar or stupid?
 BF> It more tells that you are unable to believe anything else then what
 BF> you believe is true.

Great sentence structure, BTW. Ummm, make that; what I *Know* isn't true.

i.e. It more than tells me that you are unable to make anyone believe this
media hyped fake story...

 BF>>>>> I've never heard a New Foundland or a S:t Bernhard bark but all
 BF>>>>> this
 RW>>>> Then you have less experience than I do. I've had more than one St
 RW>>>> Bernard put both of this front paws on my chest and bark in my
 RW>>>> face. That was a junk yard guard dog.
 BF>>> Trained to bark and guard.
 RW>> No, he was just mad because I disturbed his dinner.
 BF> Rule #1. Never disturb a dog while eating.

That would make him the master. I'll disturb any dog I want to, because
I'm their master. Dogs don't rule the earth, man does.

 BF> Even you should know that.

Even you should know better...

 RW>>>> Another one was on the loose, and I was minding my own business,
 RW>>>> just walking down this lonely country road.
 BF>>> And why was it on the loose?
 RW>> Because it was in the country, where dogs are allowed to roam
 RW>> freely, like they're supposed to.
 BF> Not here. Thay will disturb and hunt deers.

That's too bad. That's what dogs do.

 BF>>> Running away from someone who used to beat him up?
 RW>> Hardly, perhaps guarding the homestead...
 BF>>>  No wonder he would bark at any human being.
 RW>> Making such assumptions only makes and ass of you.
 BF> Pity he didn't bite yours.

Pity you don't have a brain, Scare crow.

 BF>>>>> Barking for everything without any reason for doing so.
 RW>>>> They're bred to do that, dog expert...
 BF>>> Are poodles bred to bark?
 RW>> No, that's just their nature...they're scared shitless of their own
 RW>> shadow, so they bark...
 BF> First you say they are bred to bark and then they aren't.

Yeup. People keep on breeding the little barkers. Maybe they like it that
way. Personally, all poodles should be neutered so there can't be anymore.

 BF> How shall it be, dog expert? Talk about making an ass of one self.

You do it on a regular basis, tell us how it shall be. I can use another
laugh.

 BF>>> I said: Unless they are very well trained to attack.
 RW>> Some dogs have a mean nature. Take the Doberman for instance. It
 RW>> will attack for no reason.
 BF> Some, yes. Those where the elevator doesn't go to top floor or are
 BF> trained to attack and even a mean Golen Retriver can go to attack.

But the Golden doesn't have a mean bone in it's body. They're lovers and
can be trusted to be gentle with babys...human babys, in case you didn't
get it.

 BF>>>>> I've calmed many of then down just by talking nicely to them.
 RW>>>> Sure you have.
 BF>>> Without any problem.
 RW>> LOL!
 BF> You should try it.

I have...

 BF> Sit down, look the other way and slowly reach out an arm towards the
 BF> dog. All hostility is gone with the wind and you have woken up the
 BF> dogs natural curiosity and he will come in peace.

Or take your arm off. LOL!

 BF>>> Now to the Big Dogs talk.
 RW>> Coming from a poodle's point of view, of course.
 BF> The last poll I did contained, perhaps 50 posts from you, so I'm
 BF> wonder who the poodle is here. And the day before that it was Frank
 BF> who had 50 postings.

That just means that we are very conversational. We're not stuck on one
topic like you are. Isn't Fidonet all about communication in Sveden?

 BF>>> Do you know what a Guadalope 69 is?
 BF>>> It's when you jerk off in your armpit and lick it up.
 RW>> So, you perform the Guadalope 69 on a regular basis and you you know
 RW>> for sure. Interesting.
 BF> I got that from GWB:s illegal wire-tapping log.

Ahhh, a fine example of a svedish terrorist, no doubt.

 BF>>> Does that qualify me to be in the Big Dogs group?
 RW>> No, you're too stupid to belong int he Big Dogs group.
 BF> Somehow I think it's better for me to stay out of it, knowing who the
 BF> alfa males are.

Yes, if you ever hope to climb up the ladder of the Greek alphabet to
Alphadom, all the way from the sad, overpopulated backwaters of Omegaland,
you have to start sounding like one.


Roy
--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000
 * Origin: Hacienda de Rio de Guadalupe * South * Texas, USA * (1:1/22)