Text 421, 227 rader
Skriven 2007-04-27 23:38:41 av Roy Witt (1:397/22)
     Kommentar till en text av bob klahn
Ärende: More Dan Ceppa lies!
============================
23 Apr 07 16:47, bob klahn wrote to Roy Witt:

 bk>>>  I'm not a conservative.
 RW>> Nor did that tagline refer to conservatives...
 bk>  Read it again when I attach it to this msg.

I can't, as the TWit(t) Robot is trained to change or delete it.

 bk>>> Well, I'm closer to a true consevative than you are, but still not
 bk>>> a conservative.
 RW>> Tax and spend and social programs where the government
 RW>> taxes the working man to support the non-working man isn't
 RW>> very conservative in my book.

 bk>  Tax and spend is very conservative, it's called pay as you go.

You know what I meant by tax and spend and it was not conservative.

Tax and spend, in this particluar political term, means taxing the people
so that you can spend more money on socialist programs...programs that the
socialistic Democrat party invented...

 bk>  As to taxing the working man, that's traditional.

Democrat party policy.

 bk> As to supporting the non-working man, caring for the disabled or the
 bk>  elderly is an old tradition. Predates the existance of this
 bk>  country in the colonies. More often, though, it's women who are
 bk>  cared for.

LOL! Yeah, ghetto black women...

 bk>  And as long as the govt makes it policy to keep people
 bk>  underemployed or unemployed, it's the govts responsibility to
 bk>  see to those people.

Sure it is...like they've been beating the concrete to find work and are
all worn out by it. More often than not, they're lazy and are child
producing welfare gathering low life; the more kids they have, the more
they get paid.

 bk> And meeting your responsibilies should be a conservative virtue.

When they get a job and stop overpopulating the ghetto, I'll think about
it.

 bk>>>>> ...

 RW>>>>>> There are more important things to do to support my country
 RW>>>>>> and the armed forces, than to serve as a grunt like you did

 bk>>>>>  No, there are not.

 RW>>>> Bullshit. There are more important jobs that can be done to
 RW>>>> support the grunts who have no better skills than to serve
 RW>>>> in a fighting force. Far more people are in support.

 bk>>>  I was in support. Still say the grunts are the ones the rest of
 bk>>>  us were there for.

So, you've now changed your story...before they were heros, but now
they're grunts that we provided for. I'll bet you can do the twist too.

 RW>> I was there before you support, and without my expertise
 RW>> and service, you and the grunts would have notthing to
 RW>> fight with. In fact, I'm more important than you, who
 RW>> merely wharehoused and distributed.

 bk>  I never wharehoused or delivered, except to the end user, as the
 bk>  tech involved.

I didn't either, I just built it...

 bk> However, there was no good reason you could not have served in the
 bk> military, then produced the weapons and material needed. Lots of
 bk> people have done that.

That's true, but my draft board (the government) decided that I would be
of more value where I was. I didn't argue with them. My 1961-66 draft
status was 3A, which means that I could have been called up (after the 1As
and 2As), but they never called... After that job was over in 74, they
chose not to change my draft status...probably because I was into my mid
30s. I did give some thought to joining the Coast Guard around 1980
though.

 bk>>> Except when I was in SAC, then we were there to blow up the
 bk>>> world.

 RW>> With an arsonal provided by people of my calibur. Without

 bk>  And maintained by people of high caliber.

LOL! How does a maintainer become of higher calibur than the inventor and
manufacturer?

 RW>> it, you wouldn't be flying, let alone bombing the world.

 bk>  And a great many of those people of your caliber served in the
 bk>  military, often as grunts.

Not possible, unless they were hiding from something. People who know what
they're doing, recognize those who also know what they're doing. They'll
be promoted sooner or later.

 bk>>>>> And no more honorable way to serve.

 RW>>>> There's more than one way to serve and all are honorable.

 bk>>>  None more honorable. Or even as honorable. IMO.

 RW>> There's no honor in being so useless as to have someone
 RW>> shove a firearm in your hand and telling you to give your
 RW>> life for your country.

 bk>  The honor is in being one of those who will take that risk, and
 bk>  do it for ungrateful people like you.

I'm not the ungrateful person you want to address that to. Try Harry Reid
and the rest of the Congressional traitors.

 bk>>>>>  Though you do demonstrate the truth that conservatives hate our
 bk>>>>>  vets.

 RW>>>> Naaaa, we don't hate anyone, but we despise assholes like
 RW>>>> you who think surrendering to the enemy is the only way.

 bk>>>  Your lot are giving our enemies everything they want.

 RW>> LOL! The Senate Majority leader who said the war in Iraq is
 RW>> 'lost' (thus emboldening the enemy) is not part of my lot.

 bk>  Ask why the military in Iraq is not being allowed to talk to the
 bk>  press.

You must not be watching the correct news source...they talk to the media
all the time...they're pissed that Pelozi and Reid have sold them out to
the enemy.

 bk>  Our continuing presence in Iraq is what the enemy wants.

That's good news...the sooner they're all there, the sooner our guys can
kill them all and then go home.

 RW>> Nor is that traitorous bitch majority leader in the house.

 bk>  Yet your previous senate and house aided bush in giving al Qaeda
 bk>  what they wanted.

LOL! They gave them lots of lead...I don't know why they would want it,
but they're welcome to it.

 bk>>> You have given Bin Laden what he wanted, the US out of Saudi
 bk>>> Arabia,

 RW>> I'm sure you're privey to what Bin Laden wants, being a

 bk>  He said it. Just like Hitler said what he wanted in Mein Kampf,

Ahhh, but not lately...he wrote it down before he died.

 bk>  Bin Ladin repeatedly made public statements and published
 bk>  remarks saying what he wanted. And one of his top lieutenants
 bk>  said Iraq was Al Qaeda's chosen battle ground.

Well, at least we didn't disapoint them...

 RW>> traitorous asshole yourself.

 bk>  You, in your desire to break our army, are the traitor.

You're a fucking liar...you're part of the problem America is having with
the defeatist left wing whacko party...

 bk>>> and
 bk>>>  Iraq as the battle field between Islam and the West. That and a
 bk>>>  massive recruiting program for al Qaeda.

 bk>>>  When, not if, the terrorists come to this country it will be
 bk>>>  your lot who made it happen.

 RW>> LOL! We haven't given them the the open door that your lot
 RW>> has given them.

 bk>  Yes, you did.

Bulllshit...your whacko liberal party is the problem.

 bk>>>  Unless we can turn it around soon, that is.

 RW>> Yeah, sure. When y'all surrender, then they'll be welcomed
 RW>> by the traitorous bastards in your lot.

 bk>  When we pull our troops back to this country,

The surrender will come after inauguration day, January, 2009...if ya'll
can win the WH in 2008...but the way it looks now, that's not going to
happen.

 bk>  we can refurbish and retrain and re-equip them, then we will once
 bk> more have a force that made the Arab world tremble.

LOL! They're were tremebling, but now they know there will be a
surrender in 2009, if y'all can win the WH...heh, heh, heh...

 bk>  ...

 RW>>>> The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are
 RW>>>> ignorant, but that they know so much that isn't so. -
 RW>>>> Ronald Reagan

 bk>>>  You don't know where he stole that from, do you.

 RW>> And I don't give a fuck where you think it came from.

 bk>  I know where it came from.

See the next line above...

The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but
that they know so much that isn't so. - Ronald Reagan


                R\%/itt

--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000
 * Origin: SATX Alamo Area Net * South * Texas, USA * (1:397/22)