Text 5904, 91 rader
Skriven 2004-12-07 04:56:04 av John Hull (1:379/1.99)
   Kommentar till text 5843 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
Ärende: Breaking News!
======================
06 Dec 04 10:53, Björn Forsström wrote to VERN HUMPHREY:

 BF>>>How many times do I have to tell you that Sweden doesn't have an 
 BF>>>army to do such things?

 VH>> How many times do I have to tell you that is YOUR fault?  Raise 
 VH>> and equip a decent army and do your share.

 BF> Sigh. With what money?
 BF> Everything doesn't revolve around having ab army just because you 
 BF> say so. There are other matters in life then to fight.

 BF>>>BF>>I do undersatand that people get killed.

 BF>>> VH> No, you don't -- when you've been wounded a couple of times, 
 BF>>> VH> when you'v VH> seen men next to you kill, THEN you'll understand.

 BF>>>That's about what I said, wasn't it?

 VH>> So now you claim you HAVE been in combat?  You HAVE been wounded 
 VH>> and HAVE seen men next to you killed?

 BF> What is it with you? Haven't you by now heard that I haven't? BUT 
 BF> I do have
 BF> empathy and symphaty with those who have.

 VH>> Did you read that we shot down thousands?  "A few" simply won't 
 VH>> cut it -- you slacked, skulked, and traded with the enemy -- even 
 VH>> while your neighbors were being overrun.

 BF> This is really getting on my nerves.
 BF> We were neutral and didn't have an army that could do anything 
 BF> about it and niether had Poland, Norway OR Denmark and why Hitler didn't 
 BF> invade Sweden you have to take up with him. I simply don't know.

Aww, gee, we're sorry to get on your nerves.  NOT!  Don't give us any crap
about how you don't have an army or that you're so small you couldn't have
stopped them anyway.  The Low Countries didn't have an army either, but they
resisted as best they could throughout the entire war.  The Poles knew they had
no chance to stop the Blitzkrieg but they tried anyway.  They even sent cavalry
against tanks.  Hitler didn't invade Sweden because he didn't have to - why
waste good troops and ammunition on cowards and collaborators?

 VH>> Mostly in battalion to regimental size units (Vernon Walters, one 
 VH>> time UN Ambassador from the United States was the laison officer 
 VH>> with a Brazilian battalion in Italy during WWII.)

 BF> And then Brazil took on many Nazis so they could hide there.
 BF> Why didn't you do anything about that?

 VH>> Now, that means they sent thousands more troops than Sweden did.

 BF> I have never heard of any Brazilians in WWII but Australians and 
 BF> are they in Iraq now?

Just because you've never heard of it doesn't mean it didn't happen.

 BF>>>You still haven't explained what the collaboration was. Only 
 BF>>>beeing condemning.

 VH>> I've mentioned trading with the enemy many times.

 BF> Is that all you can came up with?
 BF> You don't think you have to be more specific?

 BF>>> VH> And that makes it all right?  It's okay for them to commit 
 BF>>> VH> crimes like this?  You endorse terrorism?

 BF>>>No but YOU are fighting in THEIR country and they do whatever they 
 BF>>>find necessary to defend it from an intruder.

 VH>> So you ARE endorsing terrorism -- and pretending war criminals and
 VH>> terrorists are patriots defending their country!

 BF> They are defending what they believe is right and you are invading 
 BF> a country for reason you believe is right.
 BF> Only time can tell who was right.

You dumb bastard.  The majority of those terrorists are not even Iraqi.  How
many times do you have to be told that?  It isn't just us who says that, so
does the Iraqi government.  They don't give a rat's ass about Iraq, they are
simply trying to defeat the US.  They don't want the Iraqi people to be free
because free people will not allow them to operate.

John 

America:  First, Last, and Always!
Go to www.madgorilla.us for all your Domain Name Services at the lowest rates.

--- Msged/386 TE 05
 * Origin: We are the Watchmen of our own Liberty! (1:379/1.99)